Variable time scales,agent-based models,and role-playing games: The PIEPLUE river basin management game

Abstract

This article presents a specific association of a role-playing game (RPG) and an agent-based model (ABM) aimed at dealing with a large range of time scales. Applications to the field of natural resource management lead one to consider the short time scale of resource use in practice at the same time as the longer ones related to resource dynamics or actors' investments. In their daily practice, stakeholders are translating their long-term strategies, a translation that is contextualized and combined with some co-occurring events. Long-term thinking is required for sustainable use of natural resources, but it should take into account its necessary adaptation on a short time scale. This raises the necessity for tools able to tackle jointly these various time scales. The similarity of architecture between computerized ABMs and RPGs makes them easy to associate in a hybrid tool, targeted at meeting this requirement. The proposition of this article is to allocate the representation of short time scales to computerized ABMs and the long ones to RPGs, while keeping the same static structural conceptual model, shared as a common root by both. This synergy is illustrated with PIEPLUE, an interactive setting tackling water-sharing issues.

Keywords

agent-based model case study of water sharing conceptual model hybrid tool investments long-term issues natural resource management PIEPLUE participatory modeling resource dynamics resource use role-playing game stakeholders sustainable use of natural resources time-scale diversity variable time scales water management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barreteau, O. (2003). The joint use of role-playing games and models regarding negotiation processes: characterization of associations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 6(2). Available at http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/3.html .

Barreteau, O. , Bousquet, F. , & Attonaty, J.-M. (2001). Role-playing games for opening the black box of multi-agent systems: Method and teachings of its application to Senegal River valley irrigated systems. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 4(2). Available at http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/4/2/5.html

Barreteau, O. , Garin, P. , Dumontier, A. , Abrami, G. , & Cernesson, F. (2003). Agent-based facilitation of water allocation: Case study in the Drôme River valley. Group Decision and Negotiation , 12(5), 441-461.

Benbasat, I. , & Lim, J. (2000). Information technology support for debiasing group judgments: An empirical evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(1), 167-183.

Boissau, S. , & Castella, J.-C. (2003). Constructing a common representation of local institutions and land-use systems through simulation gaming and multiagent modeling in rural areas of northern Vietnam: The samba-week methodology. Simulation & Gaming, 34, 342-357.

Bousquet, F. , Barreteau, O. , d'Aquino, P. , Etienne, M. , Boissau, S. , Aubert, S. , Le Page, C. , Babin, D. , & Castella, J.-C. (2002). Multi-agent systems and role games: An approach for ecosystem co-management. In M. Janssen (Ed.), Complexity and ecosystem management: The theory and practice of multi-agent approaches (pp. 248-285). London: Edward Elgar.

Bousquet, F. , Barreteau, O. , Le Page, C. , Mullon, C. , & Weber, J. (1999). An environmental modelling approach: The use of multi-agent simulations. In F. Blasco & A. Weill (Eds.), Advances in environmental and ecological modelling (pp. 113-122). New York: Elsevier.

Burton, M.A. (1994). The irrigation management game: A role-playing exercise for training in irrigation management. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 7, 305-318.

Chennit, S. (2005). Analyse d'un jeu de rôles pour le choix de modalités de partage de l'eau. Montpellier, France: Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen.

10.

d'Aquino, P. , Le Page, C. , Bousquet, F. , & Bah, A. (2003). Using self-designed role-playing games and a multi-agent system to empower a local decision-making process for land use management: The SELF-CORMAS experiment in Senegal. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 6(3). Available at http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/3/5.html

11.

Dray, A. , Perez, P. , Le Page, C. , d'Aquino, P. , & White, I. (in press). Who wants to terminate the game? The role of vested interests and meta-players in the ATOLLGAME experience. Simulation & Gaming, 38.

12.

Driessen, P.P.J. , Glasbergen, P. , & Verdaas, C. (2001). Interactive policy making—A model of management for public works. European Journal of Operational Research , 128, 322-337.

13.

Duijn, M. , Immers, L.H. , Waaldijk, F.A. , & Stoelhorst, H.J. (2003). Gaming Approach Route 26: A combination of computer simulation, design tools and social interaction . Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations , 6(3). Available at http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/3/7.html

14.

Duke, R.D. , & Geurts, J.L.A. (2004). Policy games for strategic management. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Dutch University Press.

15.

Etienne, M. (2003). SYLVOPAST: A multiple target role-playing game to assess negotiation processes in sylvopastoral management planning. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 6(2). Available at http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/5.html

16.

Etienne, M. , Le Page, C. , & Cohen, M. (2003). A step by step approach to build up land management scenarios based on multiple viewpoints on multi-agent systems simulations . Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations , 6(2). Available at http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/2.html

17.

Hare, M.P. , & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2003). Stakeholder categorisation in participatory integrated assessment processes. Integrated Assessment, 3(1), 50-62.

18.

Lankford, B. , & Sokile, C. (2003, September). Reflections on the RIVER BASIN GAME: Role-playing facilitation of surface water allocation in contested environments . Paper presented at the International Conference on Irrigation and Drainage, Montpellier, France.

19.

Mayer, I. , & Veeneman, W. (Eds.). (2002). Games in a world of infrastructures. Simulation-games for research, learning and intervention. Delft, the Netherlands: Eburon.

20.

Meadows, D.L. (2001). Tools for understandings the limits to growth: Comparing a simulation and a game. Simulation & Gaming , 32, 522-536.

21.

Pereira, A.G. , Rinaudo, J.-D. , Jeffrey, P. , Blasques, J. , Corral Quintana, S. , Courtois, N. , et al. (2003). ICT tools to support public participation in water resources governance & planning: Experiences from the design and testing of a multi-media platform. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 5(3), 395-420.

22.

Piveteau, V. (1995). Prospective et territoire: Apports d'une réflexion sur le jeu. Antony, France: CEMAGREF Éditions.

23.

Schelling, T.C. (1961). Experimental games and bargaining theory. World Politics, 14(1), 47-68.

24.

Smith, L.E.D. (1989). The WYE COLLEGE IRRIGATION GAME. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 3, 255-264.

25.

Steenhuis, T.S. , Oaks, R.L. , Johnson, R. , Sikkens, R. , & Vander Velde, E.J. (1989). Irrigation rehab: A computer aided learning tool for system rehabilitation. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 3, 241-253.

26.

Tsuchiya, S. (1998). Simulation/gaming as an essential enabler of organizational change. Simulation & Gaming, 29, 400-408.

27.

Zanker, S. (1999). Modélisation et gestion de la demande agricole en eau dans la Drôme, cas de la mise en application du SAGE Drôme (Rapport de stage de fin d'étude ENGREF) Montpellier, France: CEMAGREF.