Natural resource policies in the United States are implemented with a social technology of objectivity. Accordingly, resource managers rely on scientific and quantitative analyses to satisfy constituencies distrustful of regulatory authorities. Cultural consensus analysis is a powerful method for determining whether knowledge domains are structured in ways that support a conclusion that cultural members recognize certain cultural truths not known before-hand to the investigator. The authors compare hand-line fishermen and fishery scientists in Hawaii regarding their knowledge about stock structure, fish movements, resource abundance, stock condition, and fishery interactions. Yellow fin tuna fishery results show that fishermen and scientists exhibit an overall consensus about ecological knowledge, although they disagree in some areas. Some practical advantages of consensus analysis are discussed along with the possibilities for growth in the fishery social science sector, cross-cultural applied research, and the practice of environmental anthropology.
Barber, W. E. (1987). The fisheries management structure and process under the MFCMA: A North Pacific perspective. Fisheries, 12(6), 10-17.
2.
Batchelder, W. H., & Romney, A. K. (1988). Test theory without an answer key. Psychometrika, 53, 71-92.
3.
Bennett, J. W. (1975). The ecological transistion: Cultural anthropology and human adaptation. New York: Pergamon.
4.
Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., & Raven, P. H. (1973). General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist, 75, 214-242.
5.
Borgatti, S. P. (1996). ANTHROPAC 4.92. Natick, MA: Analytic Technologies.
6.
Bricker, V. R. (Ed.). (1977). Human ecology [Special Issue]. American Ethnologist, 4(1).
7.
Burton, M. L., Schoepfle, G. M., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Natural resource anthropology. Human Organization, 45, 261-269.
8.
D’Andrade, R. G. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
D’Andrade, R. G. (2000). The sad story of anthropology 1950-1999. Cross-Cultural Research, 34, 219-232.
10.
Gale, R. P., & Miller, M. L. (1985). Professional and public natural resource management arenas: Forests and marine fisheries. Environment and Behavior, 17, 651-678.
11.
Hardesty, D. L. (1977). Ecological anthropology. New York: John Wiley.
12.
Hogarth, W. T. (2002). Testimony of Dr. William T. Hogarth, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, before the President’s Commission on Ocean Policy. Available from http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/OceanCommHogarthTestimony011502.htm
13.
Hubert, L. J., & Schultz, J. (1976). Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy. Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 29, 190-241.
14.
Hunn, E. (1976). Toward a perceptual model of folk biological classification. American Ethnologist, 3, 508-525.
15.
Kelly, J. E. (1978). The Fishery Conservation and Management Act of 1976: Organizational structure and conceptual framework. Marine Policy, 2, 30-36.
16.
Kempton, W., Boster, J. S., & Hartley, J. A. (1995). Environmental values in American culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Knight, H. G. (1978). Management procedures in the US fishery conservation zone. Marine Policy, 2, 22-29.
18.
Maiolo, J. R., Johnson, J. C., & Griffith, D. (1992). Applications of social science theory to fisheries management: Three examples. Society and Natural Resources, 5, 391-407.
19.
Megill, A. (1991). Four senses of objectivity. Annals of Scholarship, 8, 301-320.
20.
Miller, M. L. (1987). Regional Fishery Management Councils and the display of scientific authority. Coastal Management, 15, 309-318.
21.
Miller, M. L., & Broches, C. F. (1993). North Pacific fisheries and reauthorization of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and the Endangered Species Act. Northwest Environmental Journal, 9, 24-72.
22.
Miller, M. L., & Francis, R. C. (1989). Marine fishery management. In F. G. Johnson & R. R. Stickney (Eds.), Fisheries: Harvesting life from water (pp. 212-224). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
23.
Miller, M. L., & Gale, R. P. (1986). Natural resource sociology. In M. L. Miller, R. P. Gale, & P. J. Brown (Eds.), Social science in natural resource management systems (pp. 51-62). Boulder, CO: Westview.
24.
Miller, M. L., Gale, R .P., & Brown, P. J. (1986). Natural resource management systems. In M. L. Miller, R. P. Gale, & P. J. Brown (Eds.), Social science in natural resource management systems (pp. 3-32). Boulder, CO: Westview.
25.
Miller, M. L., & Johnson, F. G. (1989). Fish and people. In F. G. Johnson & R. R. Stickney (Eds.), Fisheries: Harvesting life from water (pp. 10-23). Dubuque, IO: Kendall/Hunt.
26.
Miller, M. L., & Van Maanen, J. (1983). The emerging organization of fisheries in the United States. Coastal Zone Management Journal, 10, 369-386.
27.
Morehead, B. (2001). Comments at the Fisheries management workshop. Available from http://www.seafood.co.nz/items/documents/Science/Morehead.doc
28.
National Marine Fisheries Service. (1998). Strategic plan for fisheries research. Silver Springs, MD: Author, Department of Commerce.
29.
National Marine Fisheries Service. (2001). Appendix 2 (g): Guidelines for assessment of the social impact of fishery management actions.In Operational guidelines: Fishery management plan process. Silver Springs, MD: Author, Department of Commerce.
30.
Netting, R. M. (1977). Cultural ecology. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.
31.
Ocean Studies Board. (2000). Recruiting fishery scientists: Workshop on stock assessment and science careers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
32.
Porter, T. M. (1992). Objectivity as standardization: The rhetoric of impersonality in measurement, statistics, and cost-benefit analysis. Annals of Scholarship, 9, 19-61.
33.
Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Romney, A. K. (1989). Quantitative models, science and cumulative knowledge. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 1, 153-223.
35.
Romney, A. K., Batchelder, W. H., & Weller, S. C. (1987). Recent applications of cultural consensus theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 163-177.
36.
Romney, A. K., & D’Andrade, R. G. (Eds.). (1964). Transcultural studies in cognition [Special Publication]. American Anthropologist, 66(3 Pt. 2).
37.
Romney, A. K., Boyd, J. P., Moore, C. C., Batchelder, W. H., & Brazil, T. J. (1996). Culture as shared cognitive representation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 4699-4705.
38.
Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C., & Batchelder, W. H. (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88, 313-338.
39.
Soulé, M. E. (1986). Conservation biology and the “real world.” In M. E. Soulé (Ed.), Conservation biology: The science of scarcity and diversity (pp. 1-12). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
40.
Townsend, P. (2000). Environmental anthropology: From pigs to politics. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
41.
Tyler, S. A. (Ed.) (1969). Cognitive anthropology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
42.
Vayda, A. P., & McCay, B. J. (1975). New directions in ecology and ecological anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 4, 293-306.
43.
Wallace, R., Hosking, W., & Szedlmayer, S. T. (1994). Fisheries management for fishermen: A manual for helping fishermen understand the federal management process (Report No. MASGP-94-012). Mobile, AL: Auburn University Marine Extension & Research Center.
44.
Weller, S. C. (1998). Structured interviewing and questionnaire construction. In H. R. Bernard (Ed.), Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology (pp. 365-410). Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
