Technology Access and Attitudes Toward Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence From a National Survey in Thailand

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of attitudes toward intimate partner violence (IPV) in Thailand. Estimations from binary probit model indicate that Muslim, poverty, and residence in southern/central regions correlate with higher IPV tolerance for both genders. Wealthier women show less tolerance in some situations, while wealthier men show more, particularly related to housework neglect. Access to technology presents mixed results: computer/tablet/mobile phone ownership correlates with increased IPV tolerance in some scenarios, while internet access significantly reduces it. These findings suggest leveraging technology, especially internet access, to combat IPV by improving access to support, raising awareness, and promoting peaceful conflict resolution.

Keywords

intimate partner violence technology access gender differences binary probit model Thailand

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adewale

Dey

N. E. Y.

Ansah

K. O.

Duah

H. O.

Agbadi

(2021). The association between polygyny statuses of currently married and in-union women and attitude towards intimate partner violence against women in Ghana. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1),Article 100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100207

Ahinkorah

B. O.

(2021). Polygyny and intimate partner violence in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from 16 cross-sectional demographic and health surveys. SSM – Population Health, 13

100729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100729

Alesina

Brioschi

La Ferrara

(2021). Violence against women: A cross-cultural analysis for Africa. Economica, 88(349), 70–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12343

Basile

K. C.

Smith

S. G.

Black

M. C.

Mahendra

R. R.

(2004). Risky behaviors and intimate partner violence victims. Journal of Adolescent Health, 34(4), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.11.003

Black

M. C.

Basile

K. C.

Breiding

M. J.

Smith

S. G.

Walters

M. L.

Merrick

M. T.

Stevens

M. R.

(2011). The health consequences of intimate partner violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(3), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.015

Campbell

J. C.

(2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359(9314), 1331–1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08336-8

Department of Women’s Affairs and Family Development. (2022). Domestic violence statistics in Thailand. Ministry of Social Development and Human Security.

Devries

K. M.

Mak

J. Y.

García-Moreno

Petzold

Child

C. J.

Falder

Lim

Bacchus

L. J.

Engell

R. E.

Rosenfeld

Pallitto

Vos

Abrahams

Watts

C. H.

(2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science 340, 1527–1528. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240937

Dobash

R. E.

Dobash

R. P.

(1979). Violence against wives: A case against patriarchy. Free Press.

10.

Duerksen

S. C.

McRae

McHugh

(2019). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: The role of technology in intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(21), 4383–4404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519828321

11.

Dutton

D. G.

White

K. R.

(2013). The domestic violence offender and the role of personality. The Family Journal, 21(3), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480713491289

12.

Emezue

Chase

J. D.

Udmuangpia

Bloom

T. L.

(2022). Technology-based and digital interventions for intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(3), e1271. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1271

13.

Fals-Stewart

Klostermann

Clinton-Sherrod

(2009). Substance abuse and intimate partner violence. In O’Leary

K. D.

Woodin

E. M.

(Eds.), Psychological and physical aggression in couples: Causes and interventions (pp. 251–269). American Psychological Association.

14.

Gillanders

McNamara

(2024). Smartphones and attitudes to intimate partner violence: Evidence from Africa. Kyklos, 174

(

3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106456

15.

Gracia

Herrero

(2006). Acceptability of domestic violence against women in the European Union: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.036533

16.

Heise

L. L.

(1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4(3), 262–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801298004003002

17.

Henry

Flynn

Powell

(2020). Technology-facilitated domestic and sexual violence: A review. Violence Against Women, 26(15–16), 1828–1854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219875821

18.

Kishor

Johnson

(2004). Profiling domestic violence: A multi-country study. ORC Macro.

19.

Kitzmann

K. M.

Gaylord

N. K.

Holt

A. R.

Kenny

E. D.

(2003). Child witnesses to domestic violence: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(2), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.2.339

20.

Miller

C. J.

Adjognon

O. L.

Brady

J. E.

Dichter

M. E.

Iverson

K. M.

(2021). Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: An implementation-oriented systematic review. Implementation Research and Practice, 2, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895211039894

21.

Miller

McCaw

(2019). Intimate partner violence. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(9), 850–857. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1807166

22.

Pesando

L. M.

(2022). Safer if connected? Mobile technology and intimate partner violence. Demography, 59(2), 653–684. https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-9774978

23.

Widom

C. S.

(1989). The cycle of violence. Science, 244(4901), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2704995

24.

Woodlock

(2017). TThe abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women, 23(5), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216646277

25.

Yount

K. M.

Pham

H. T.

Minh

T. H.

Krause

K. H.

Schuler

S. R.

Anh

H. T.

Vanderende

Kramer

M. R.

(2014). Violence in childhood, attitudes about partner violence, and partner violence perpetration among men in Vietnam. Annals of Epidemiology, 24(5), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.02.004