Not much is known about the etiology, or development, of deviant sexual interests. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a broad overview of current theories on the etiology of sexual deviance. We conducted a systematic search of the databases PubMed and APA PsycInfo (EBSCO). Studies were included when they discussed a theory regarding the etiology or development of sexual deviance. Included studies were assessed on quality criteria for good theories. Common etiological themes were extracted using thematic analysis. We included 47 theories explaining sexual deviance in general as well as various specific deviant sexual interests, such as pedophilia and sadism/masochism. Few theories (k = 7) were of acceptable quality as suggested by our systematic assessment of quality criteria for good theories (QUACGOT). These theories indicated that deviant sexual interests may develop as the result of an interplay of various factors: excitation transfer between emotions and sexual arousal, conditioning, problems with “normative” sexuality, and social learning. Neurobiological findings could not be included as no acceptable quality neurobiological theories could be retrieved. The important roles of excitation transfer and conditioning designate that dynamic, changeable processes take part in the etiology of sexual deviance. These same processes could potentially be deployed to diminish unwanted deviant sexual interests.
ÅgmoA.LaanE. (2022). Sexual incentive motivation, sexual behavior, and general arousal: Do rats and humans tell the same story?Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 135, Article 104595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104595
*AllelyC. S. (2020). Autism spectrum disorder, bestiality and zoophilia: A systematic PRISMA review. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 11(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/jidob-06-2019-0012
5.
AllenA.KatsikitisM.MillearP.McKillopN. (2020). Psychological interventions for sexual fantasies and implications for sexual violence: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 55(June), Article 101465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101465
6.
AllenM.D’AlessioD.BrezgelK. (1995). A meta-analysis summarizing the effects of pornography II: Aggression after exposure. Human Communication Research, 22(2), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00368.x
7.
*AntinucciG. (2016). Beating phantasies: Mourned and unmourned. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 97(3), 615–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12451
8.
*ApostolouM.KhalilM. (2019). Aggressive and humiliating sexual play: Occurrence rates and discordance between the sexes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(7), 2187–2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1266-8
9.
*ArrigoB. A.PurcellC. E. (2001). Explaining paraphilias and lust murder: Toward an integrated model. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(1), 6–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X01451002
10.
BartelsR. M.BeechA. R.HarkinsL.ThorntonD. (2018). Assessing sexual interest in children using the Go/No-Go Association Test. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30(5), 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063216686119
11.
BártováK.AndrovičováR.KrejčováL.WeissP.KlapilováK. (2021). The prevalence of paraphilic interests in the Czech population: Preference, arousal, the use of pornography, fantasy, and behavior. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1707468
12.
BaurE.ForsmanM.LångströmN. (2017). Response to Joyal’s (2016) “linking crime to paraphilia: Be careful with label”. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(4), 867–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0949-x
13.
BaurE.ForsmanM.SanttilaP.JohanssonA.SandnabbaK.LångströmN. (2016). Paraphilic sexual interests and sexually coercive behavior: A population-based twin study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(5), 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0674-2
14.
BezrehT.WeinbergT. S.EdgarT. (2012). BDSM disclosure and stigma management: Identifying opportunities for sex education. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 7(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15546128.2012.650984
15.
*BhugraD. (2000). Disturbances in objects of desire: Cross-cultural issues. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 15(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990050001574
*BlanchardR. (1991). Clinical observations and systematic studies of autogynephilia. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 17(4), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926239108404348
18.
BondüR.BirkeJ. (2020). Links between aggressive sexual fantasies and presumably non-consensual aggressive sexual behavior when controlling for BDSM identity. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-3777
19.
BothS.EveraerdW.LaanE. (2007). Desire emerges from excitement. A psychophysiological perpective on sexual motivation. In JanssenE. (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 327–339). Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
20.
BrankleyA. E.BabchishinK. M.HansonR. K. (2021). STABLE-2007 demonstrates predictive and incremental validity in assessing risk-relevant propensities for sexual offending: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 33(1), 34–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219871572
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
23.
BromM.BothS.LaanE.EveraerdW.SpinhovenP. (2014). The role of conditioning, learning and dopamine in sexual behavior: A narrative review of animal and human studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 38(1), 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.10.014
24.
Brouillette-AlarieS.ProulxJ. (2019). The etiology of risk in sexual offenders: A preliminary model. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 31(4), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063218759325
25.
Brouillette-AlarieS.ProulxJ.HansonR. K. (2018). Three central dimensions of sexual recidivism risk: Understanding the latent constructs of Static-99R and Static-2002R. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30(6), 676–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217691965
26.
BrownA.BarkerE. D.RahmanQ. (2020). A systematic scoping review of the prevalence, etiological, psychological, and interpersonal factors associated with BDSM. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(6), 781–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1665619
27.
CazalaF.FonteilleV.MoulierV.Pelegrini-IssacM.De BeaurepaireC.AbondoM.Bodon-BruzelM.CanoJ.CochezF.FouliT.ThevenonC.DaubaB.PugeatM.StoleruS. (2019). Brain responses to pictures of children in men with pedophilic disorder: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 269(6), 713–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-018-0933-z
28.
*CohenL. J.GalynkerI. I. (2002). Clinical features of pedophilia and implications for treatment. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 8(5), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1097/00131746-200209000-00004
29.
CraigA. N.PetersonZ. D.JanssenE.GoodrichD.HeimanJ. R. (2017). Affect and sexual responsivity in men with and without a history of sexual aggression. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(8), 984–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1301357
30.
CraigL. A.BartelsR. M. (2021). An overview of sexual deviance and paraphilic disorders. In CraigL. A.BartelsR. M. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Understanding and managing deviant sexual interest and paraphilic disorders (pp. 3–22). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119771401.ch1
31.
*CritelliJ. W.BivonaJ. M. (2008). Women’s erotic rape fantasies: An evaluation of theory and research. The Journal of Sex Research, 45(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490701808191
32.
*DahanO. (2019). Submission, pain and pleasure: Considering an evolutionary hypothesis concerning sexual masochism. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory Research, and Practice, 6(4), 386–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000202
33.
DavisR.CampbellR.HildonZ.HobbsL.MichieS. (2015). Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: A scoping review. Health Psychology Review, 9(3), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.941722
34.
*DawsonS. J.BannermanB. A.LalumièreM. L. (2016). Paraphilic interests: An examination of sex differences in a nonclinical sample. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28(1), 20–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214525645
35.
DillardR.BeaujolaisB. (2019). Trauma and adolescents who engage in sexually abusive behavior: A review of the literature. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 28(6), 629–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2019.1598528
36.
DillienT.GoethalsK.SabbeB.BrazilI. A. (2020). The neuropsychology of child sexual offending: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 54(August 2019), Article 101406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101406
37.
DomjanM.HollisK. L. (1988). Reproductive behavior: A potential model system for adaptive specializations in learning. In BollesR. C.BeecherM. D. (Eds.), Evolution and learning. Hillsdale. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-98812-011
38.
*DunkleyC. R.HenshawC. D.HenshawS. K.BrottoL. A. (2020). Physical pain as pleasure: A theoretical perspective. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(4), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1605328
39.
*EnquistM.AronssonH.GhirlandaS.JanssonL.JanniniE. A. (2011). Exposure to mother’s pregnancy and lactation in infancy is associated with sexual attraction to pregnancy and lactation in adulthood. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(1), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02065.x
40.
EtzlerS.EherR.RettenbergerM. (2020). Dynamic risk assessment of sexual offenders: Validity and dimensional structure of the Stable-2007. Assessment, 27(4), 822–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118754705
*FoxM. H.SetoM. C.RefaieN.LavrinsekS.HallV.CurryS.AshbaughA. R.LevaqueE.FedoroffJ. P.BradfordJ. M.LalumièreM. L. (2022). The relation between the paraphilias and anxiety in men: A case–control study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(8), 4063–4084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02346-z
GannonT. A.OlverM. E.MallionJ. S.JamesM. (2019). Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clinical Psychology Review, 73(101752), 101752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101752
46.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2015). Theory evaluation. In GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (Eds.), Theory and explanation in social psychology (pp. 3–23). Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-05078-001
47.
*GeeD.BelofastovA. (2007). Profiling sexual fantasy: Fantasy in sexual offending and the implications for criminal profiling. In KocsisR. N. (Ed.), Criminal profiling: International theory, research, and practice (pp. 49–71). Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-146-2_3
48.
GieselerK.LoschelderD. D.FrieseM. (2019). What makes for a good theory? How to evaluate a theory using the strength model of self-control as an example. In SassenbergK.VliekM. L. W. (Eds.), Social psychology in action (pp. 3–21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_1
49.
*GrossmanL. (2015). The object-preserving function of sadomasochism. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 84(3), 643–664. https://doi.org/10.1002/psaq.12023
50.
*GrovC. (2004). “Make me your death slave”: Men who have sex with men and use the internet to intentionally spread HIV. Deviant Behavior, 25(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620490427683
HansonR. K.ThorntonD. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005482921333
53.
*HarrisE. A.ThaiM.BarlowF. K. (2017). Fifty shades flipped: Effects of reading erotica depicting a sexually dominant woman compared to a sexually dominant man. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(3), 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1131227
54.
*HawleyP. H.HensleyW. A.4th (2009). Social dominance and forceful submission fantasies: Feminine pathology or power?The Journal of Sex Research, 46(6), 568–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902878985
55.
HelmusL. M.HansonR. K.MurrieD. C.ZabarauckasC. L. (2021). Field validity of Static-99R and STABLE-2007 with 4,433 men serving sentences for sexual offences in British Columbia: New findings and meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 33(7), 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001010
56.
HigginsE. T. (2004). Making a theory useful: Lessons handed down. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 8(2), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0802_7
HoffmannH.JanssenE.TurnerS. L. (2004). Classical conditioning of sexual arousal in women and men: Effects of varying awareness and biological relevance of the conditioned stimulus. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000007461.59019.d3
59.
HoonP. W.WinczeJ. P.HoonE. F. (1977). A test of reciprocal inhibition: Are anxiety and sexual arousal in women mutually inhibitory?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.86.1.65
60.
HuppinM.MalamuthN. M.LinzD. (2019). An evolutionary perspective on sexual assault and implications for interventions. In O’DonohueW. T.ScheweP. A. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault and sexual assault prevention (pp. 17–44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23645-8
61.
*ImhoffR.BanseR.SchmidtA. F. (2017). Toward a theoretical understanding of sexual orientation and sexual motivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0881-5
JoyalC. C.CarpentierJ. (2017). The prevalence of paraphilic interests and behaviors in the general population: A provincial survey. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1139034
64.
JoyalC. C.CossetteA.LapierreV. (2015). What exactly is an unusual sexual fantasy?The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(2), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12734
65.
*JuniS. (2009). The role of sexuality in sadism: Object relations and drive theory perspectives. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 69(4), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1057/ajp.2009.17
KwasnickaD.DombrowskiS. U.WhiteM.SniehottaF. (2016). Theoretical explanations for maintenance of behaviour change: A systematic review of behaviour theories. Health Psychology Review, 10(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2016.1151372
69.
LalumièreM. L.FairweatherA.HarrisG. T.SuschinskyK. D.SetoM. C. (2017). Genital responses to rape vignettes among young men: The influence of mood and directed attention. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(3), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0809-0
70.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
71.
LateefR.JenneyA. (2021). Understanding sexually victimized male adolescents with sexually abusive behaviors: A narrative review and clinical implications. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(5), 1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020906558
72.
*LawrenceA. A. (2006). Clinical and theoretical parallels between desire for limb amputation and gender identity disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35(3), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9026-6
73.
LawrenceA. L.WillisG. M. (2021). Understanding and challenging stigma associated with sexual interest in children: A systematic review. International Journal of Sexual Health: Official Journal of the World Association for Sexual Health, 33(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2020.1865498
74.
*LawsD. R.MarshallW. L. (1990). A conditioning theory of the etiology and maintenance of deviant sexual preference and behavior. In MarshallW. L.LawsD. R.BarbareeH. E. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault(pp. 209–229). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0915-2
LevensonJ. S.AckermanA. R. (2017). The relationship between sex offender height and pedophilic interest. Deviant Behavior, 38(12), 1383–1392. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1254986
77.
*LussierP.BeauregardE.ProulxJ.NicoleA. (2005). Developmental factors related to deviant sexual preferences in child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(9), 999–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505278024
78.
*MacCullochM.GrayN.WattA. (2000). Brittain’s sadistic murderer syndrome reconsidered: An associative account of the aetiology of sadistic sexual fantasy. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 11(2), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585180050142606
79.
MalamuthN. M.CheckJ. V.BriereJ. (1986). Sexual arousal in response to aggression: Ideological, aggressive, and sexual correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.330
80.
*ManiglioR. (2011). The role of childhood trauma, psychological problems, and coping in the development of deviant sexual fantasies in sexual offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(5), 748–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.003
81.
*ManiglioR. (2012). The role of parent-child bonding, attachment, and interpersonal problems in the development of deviant sexual fantasies in sexual offenders. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838012440337
82.
MartinS. M.SmithF.QuirkS. W. (2016). Discriminating coercive from sadomasochistic sexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(5), 1173–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0595-0
83.
*MassaN.BiscontiP.NardiD. (2022). The psychological implications of companion robots: A theoretical framework and an experimental setup. International Journal of Social Robotics, 23, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00846-x
*McGuireR. J.CarlisleJ. M.YoungB. G. (1964). Sexual deviations as conditioned behaviour: A hypothesis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2(2–4), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(64)90014-2
86.
McPhailI. V.HermannC. A.FernaneS.FernandezY. M.NunesK. L.CantorJ. M. (2019). Validity in phallometric testing for sexual interests in children: A meta-analytic review. Assessment, 26(3), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117706139
87.
McPhailI. V.OlverM. E. (2020). Interventions for pedohebephilic arousal in men convicted for sexual offenses against children: A meta-analytic review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(10), 1319–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820916774
88.
McPhailI. V.OlverM. E.Brouillette-AlarieS.LoomanJ. (2018). Taxometric analysis of the latent structure of pedophilic interest. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(8), 2223–2240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1225-4
*O’KeefeS. L.BeardK. W.StroebelS. S.BerhieG.BickhamP. J.RobinettS. R. (2009). Correlates of inserted object-assisted sexual behaviors in women: A model for development of paraphilic and non-paraphilic urges. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 16(2), 101–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720160902724418
91.
Oxford University Press. (2021). Oxford English dictionary. https://www.oed.com/
92.
PageM.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(n71), n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
93.
PaquetteS.Brouillette-AlarieS. (2020). How do sexual interests cluster and relate to sexual offending behaviours against children? In AkermanG.PerkinsD.BartelsR. M. (Eds.), Assessing and managing problematic sexual interests (pp. 2–22). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429287695
*QuinseyV. L.LalumièreM. L. (1995). Evolutionary perspectives on sexual offending. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02256834
96.
RampinR.RampinV. (2021). Taguette: Open-source qualitative data analysis. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(68), 3522. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03522
97.
RenaudC. A.ByersE. S. (2005). Relationship between sexual violence and positive and negative cognitions of sexual dominance. Sex Roles, 53(3–4), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-5683-5
*ScarpazzaC.FinosL.GenonS.MasieroL.BortolatoE.CavaliereC.PezzaioliJ.MonaroM.NavarinN.BattagliaU.PietriniP.FerracutiS.SartoriG.Camperio CianiA. S. (2021). Idiopathic and acquired pedophilia as two distinct disorders: An insight from neuroimaging. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 15(5), 2681–2692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-020-00442-z
101.
SchippersE. E.SmidW. J.BothS.SmitJ. H. (2022). Excitation transfer between sexual arousal and other emotions in a community sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(8), 3905–3918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02235-x
102.
SchippersE. E.SmidW. J.HoogstederL. M.PlantingC. H. M.de VogelV. (2022). Pedophilia is associated with a lack of sexual interest in adults: Meta-analyses and a systematic review. Manuscript submitted for publication.
103.
SchippersE. E.SmidW. J.HuckelbaA. L.HoogstederL. M.BeekmanA. T. F.SmitJ. H. (2021). Exploratory factor analysis of unusual sexual interests. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 18(9), 1615–1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.07.002
104.
SchmidtA. F.ImhoffR. (2021). Towards a theory of chronophilic sexual orientation in heterosexual men. In CraigL. A.BartelsR. M. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Understanding and managing deviant sexual interest and paraphilic disorders (pp. 41–52). Wiley-Blackwell. https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.mu.idm.oclc.org/doi/10.1002/9781119771401.ch3
105.
*SchrutA. (2005). A psychodynamic (nonoedipal) and brain function hypothesis regarding a type of male sexual masochism. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 33(2), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1521/jaap.2005.33.2.333
106.
SetoM. C. (2019). The motivation-facilitation model of sexual offending. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 31(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217720919
107.
SetoM. C.CurryS.DawsonS. J.BradfordJ. M. W.ChiversM. L. (2021). Concordance of paraphilic interests and behaviors. The Journal of Sex Research, 58(4), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1830018
108.
SimonsD. A.WurteleS. K.DurhamR. L. (2008). Developmental experiences of child sexual abusers and rapists. Child abuse & neglect, 32(5), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.027
109.
SmidW. J. (2021). Future directions in the treatment of sexual self-regulation problems in people who have sexually offended. In UziebloK.SmidW. J.McCartanK. F. (Eds.), Challenges in the management of people convicted of a sexual offence (pp. 141–156). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80212-7
110.
*SmidW. J.WeverE. C. (2019). Mixed emotions: An incentive motivational model of sexual deviance. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 31(7), 731–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063218775972
111.
StinsonJ. D.BeckerJ. V.SalesB. D. (2008). Self-regulation and the etiology of sexual deviance: Evaluating causal theory. Violence & Victims, 23(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.1.35
112.
*StroebelS. S.O’KeefeS. L.BeardK. W.RobinettS. R.KommorM. J.SwindellS. (2010). Correlates of inserted object-assisted sexual behaviors in men: A model for development of paraphilic and non-paraphilic urges. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 17(2), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720161003795943
van KesselL.SmidW. J.JansenJ. M. (2022). The neurobiology of pedophilia: A critical systematic review of neuroimaging studies. Manuscript submitted for publication.
115.
van LangeP. A. M. (2013). What we should expect from theories in social psychology: Truth, Abstraction, Progress, and Applicability as Standards (TAPAS). Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312453088
116.
WackerJ. G. (1998). A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9
117.
WalduraJ. F.AroraI.RandallA. M.FaralaJ. P.SprottR. A. (2016). Fifty shades of stigma: Exploring the health care experiences of kink-oriented patients. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13(12), 1918–1929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.09.019
WangZ.LangA. (2012). Reconceptualizing excitation transfer as motivational activation changes and a test of the television program context effects. Media Psychology, 15(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2011.649604
*WardT.FisherS.BeechA. (2016). An integrated theory of sexual offending. In PhenixA.HobermanH. M. (Eds.), Sexual offending (pp. 1–11). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2416-5_1
122.
WilliamsK. M.CooperB. S.HowellT. M.YuilleJ. C.PaulhusD. L. (2009). Inferring sexually deviant behavior from corresponding fantasies: The role of personality and pornography consumption. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(2), 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808327277
123.
WilpertJ. (2018). Self-reported versus diagnosed paraphilias in outpatient sexual offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 29(2), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2017.1365156
124.
WolchikS. A.BeggsV. E.WinczeJ. P.SakheimD. K.BarlowD. H.MavissakalianM. (1980). The effect of emotional arousal on subsequent sexual arousal in men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89(4), 595–598. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.89.4.595
125.
*WoodH. (2010). Applied analytic work in forensic settings: The understanding and treatment of paedophilia. In LemmaA.PatrickM. (Eds.), Off the couch: Contemporary psychoanalytic applications (pp. 143–159). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855614
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
