Heat processing of soybeans alters its structural behavior, solubility, and in turn the functional properties. Heat-processed soy flour was prepared by autoclaving the defatted soy flour at 121 °C at 15 psi. The effect of enzymatic modification on the structural changes and functional properties of heat-processed soy flour was investigated. The combination of heat processing and enzymatic modification was carried out in two ways: (1) enzymatic modification followed by autoclaving and (2) autoclaving followed by enzymatic modification. Defatted soy flour (control), autoclaved soy flour, enzyme-modified flour, enzyme-modified and then autoclaved flour, autoclaved and then enzyme-modified flour were analyzed for physico-chemical and functional properties. Molecular weight profile of the protein was altered depending on the nature of treatments. Structural studies showed that enzymatic modification gave a porous type morphology to the particles. Enzymatic modification of autoclaved soy flour increased its surface hydrophobicity to 3136±400 units from 600±100 units of autoclaved soy flour. The results indicated that enzymatic modification of autoclaved soy flour increased its acid solubility (pH 4—4.5) from 17% to 56% over a control value of 24%. The foaming capacity of the enzyme-modified and then autoclaved soy flour was 80% while that of the autoclaved and then enzyme-modified flour was 42%. The soy flour that was autoclaved and then enzyme modified showed better emulsifying properties (174 mL oil/g flour) than the flour that was enzyme-modified and then autoclaved. The modified soy flour based on its functional and physico-chemical properties should find application in many food systems.
Adler-Nissen J. ( 1979). Determination of degree of hydrolysis of food protein hydrolysates by Trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry27: 1256-1262.
2.
Adler-Nissen J. ( 1986). A review of food protein hydrolysis-specific areas. In: Adler-Nissen J. (ed.). Enzymic Hydrolysis of Food Proteins. New York: Elsevier Applied Science Publications, pp. 57-131.
3.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) ( 2000). Animal feeds, In: Connif P. (ed.). Official Methods of Analysis, Chap. 4, Vol. I, 17th edn, Virginia, USA: AOAC, pp. 1-37.
4.
Aoki H., Taneyama O., Orimo N. and Kitagawa I. ( 1981). Effect of lipophilization of soy protein on its emulsion stabilizing properties. Journal of Food Science46: 1192-1195.
5.
Bhooma K. and Prakash V. ( 1990). Functional properties of the flour and the major protein fraction from sesame seed, sunflower seed and safflower seed. Acta Alimentaria19: 163-176.
6.
Caessens P.W.J.R., Daamen W.F., Gruppen H., Visser S. and Voragen A.G.J. ( 1999). β-lactoglobulin hydrolysis. II Peptide identification, SH/SS exchange and functional properties hydrolysates fractions formed by the action of plasmin. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry47: 2980-2990.
7.
Cheftel J.C., Cuq J.L. and Lorient D. ( 1985). Amino acids, peptides and proteins. In: Fennema O.R. (ed.). Food Chemistry. 2nd edn, New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., pp. 246-414.
8.
Cheftel J.C. and Dumay E. ( 1993). Microcoagulation of proteins for development of creaminess . Food Reviews International9: 473-502.
9.
Chobert J.M., Bertrand-Harb C. and Nicolas M.G. ( 1988a). Solubility and emulsifying properties of caseins and whey proteins modified enzymatically by trypsin. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry36: 883-892.
10.
Chobert J.M., Sitohy M.Z. and Whitaker J.H. ( 1988b). Solubility and emulsifying properties of caseins modified enzymatically by Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry36: 220-224.
11.
Damodaran S. ( 1996). Amino acids, peptides and proteins. In: Fennema W.O. (ed.). Food Chemistry. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, pp. 373-380.
12.
Damodaran S. ( 1994). Structure function relationship of food proteins. In: Zieger G.R. and Hettiarachchy N.S. (eds). Protein Functionality in Food Systems. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., pp. 190-225.
13.
Dickinson E. and Matsumura Y. ( 1994). Proteins at liquid interfaces: role of the molten globule state. Colloids Surfaces B. 3: 1-17.
14.
Haque Z.U. ( 1993). Influence of milk peptides in determining the functionality of milk protein: a review. Journal of Dairy Science76: 311-320.
15.
Hayakawa S. and Nakai S. ( 1985). Relationship of hydrophobicity and net charge to the solubility of milk and salt proteins. Journal of Food Science50: 486-491.
16.
Henning T., Mothes R., Dudek S., Krause J.P. and Schwenke K.D. ( 1997). Structural and functional changes of faba bean legumin during super-limited tryptic hydrolysis. Nahrung41: 81-86.
17.
Hill A.R., Irvine D.M. and Bullock D.H. ( 1982). Precipitation and recovery of whey proteins. A review . Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal15: 155-160.
18.
Hoshi Y. and Yamauchi F. ( 1983). Further studies on the aggregation and insolubilization of soy bean 11S globulin with humidity storage. Agricultural Biological Chemistry47: 1473-1479.
19.
Jung S., Murphy P.A. and Johnson L.A. ( 2005). Physicochemical and functional properties of soy protein substrates modified by low levels of protease hydrolysis. Journal of Food Science70: C180-C187.
20.
Kim S.Y., Park P.S.W. and Rhee K.C. ( 1990). Functional properties of proteolytic enzyme modified soy protein isolate. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry38: 651-656.
21.
Kinsella J.E. ( 1976). Functional properties of proteins in foods: a survey . CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition7: 219-280.
22.
LaemmLi U.K. ( 1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature227: 680-685.
23.
Liu M., Lee D.S. and Damodaran S. ( 1999). Emulsifying properties of acidic subunits of soy 11S globulin. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry47: 4970-4975.
24.
Mahmoud M.I. ( 1994). Physicochemical and functional properties of protein hydrolysates in nutrition products. Food Technology48: 89-95.
25.
Marsman G.J.P., Guruppen H., de Groot J. and Voragen A.G.J. ( 1998). Effect of toasting and extrusion at different shear levels on soy protein interactions. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry46: 2770-2777.
26.
Molina Ortiz S.E. and Wagner J.R. ( 2002). Hydrolysates of native and modified soy protein isolates: structural characteristics, solubility and foaming properties. Food Research International35: 511-518.
27.
Morr C.V. ( 1979). Conformation and functionality of milk proteins. In: Pour-El A. (ed.). Functionality and Protein Structure. Washington DC, USA: ACS Symposium Series 91, pp. 65-80.
28.
Panyam D. and Kilara A. ( 1996). Enhancing the functionality of food proteins by enzymatic modification. Trends in Food Science and Technology7: 120-125.
29.
Pearce K.N. and Kinsella J.E. ( 1978). Emulsifying properties of proteins: evaluation of a turbidometric technique. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry26: 716-723.
30.
Petruccelli S. and Añón M.C. ( 1994). Soy protein isolate components and their interactions . Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry43: 1762-1767.
31.
Puppo M.C., Speroni F., Chapleau N., de Lamballerie M., Anon M.C. and Anton M. ( 2005). Effect of high pressure treatment on emulsifying properties of soybean proteins. Food Hydrocolloids19: 289-296.
32.
Puski G. ( 1975). Modification of functional properties of soy proteins by proteolytic enzyme treatment. Cereal Chemistry52: 655-664.
33.
Qi M., Hettiarachchy N.S. and Kalapathy U. ( 1997). Solubility and emulsifying properties of soy protein isolates modified by pancreatin. Journal of Food Science62: 1110-1115.
34.
Rahali V. and Gueguen J. ( 1999). Chemical cleavage of bovine β-lactoglobulin by BNPS-skatole for preparative purposes: comparative study of hydrolytic procedures and peptide characterization. Journal of Protein Chemistry18: 1-12.
35.
Rickert D.A., Johnson L.A. and Murphy P.A. ( 2004). Functional properties of improved glycinin and β-conglycinin fractions. Journal of Food Science69: 303-311.
36.
Stapelfeldt H., Petersen P.H., Kristiansen K.R., Qvist K.B. and Skilbsted L.H. ( 1996). Effect of high hydrostatic pressure on the enzymic hydrolysis of β-lactoglobulin B by trypsin, thermolysin and pepsin. Journal of Dairy Research63: 111-118.
37.
Turgeon S.L., Gauthier S.F. and Paquin P. ( 1992). Emulsifying property of whey peptide fractions as a function of pH and ionic strength. Journal of Food Science57: 601-604.
38.
Voutsinas L.P., Cheung E. and Nakai S. ( 1983). Relationship of hydrophobicity to emulsifying properties of heat denatured proteins. Journal of Food Science48: 26-32.
39.
Wagner J.R., Sorgentini D.A. and Anon M.C. ( 2000). Relation between solubility and surface aromatic hydrophobicity as an indicator of modification during preparation processes of commercial and laboratory prepared soy protein isolates. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry48: 3159-3165.
40.
Wolf W.J. and Tamura T. ( 1969). Heat denaturation of soybean 11S protein. Cereal Chemistry46: 331-344.
41.
Wu W.U., Hettiarachchy N.S. and Qi M. ( 1998). Hydrophobicity, solubility and emulsifying properties of soy protein peptides prepared by papain modification and ultrafiltration . Journal of American Oil Chemists Society75: 845-850.
