This study investigated the use of Novo Pro-D® (NPD) and Ficin (FC) as alternative proteases for the production of bioactive peptides with reduced allergenicity from whey protein concentrate (WPC). In addition, the use of high hydrostatic pressure processing as pre-treatment of WPC and its impact on the final characteristics of hydrolysates were also evaluated. NPD treatments generated hydrolysates with a 98% reduction of soluble proteins, greater in vitro antioxidant capacity, and less immunoreactivity when compared to FC ones. However, pre-treatment was an essential tool to improve WPC hydrolysis when FC was used, resulting in hydrolysates with less soluble proteins, enhanced antioxidant capacity, and less allergenicity compared with conventional hydrolysis. As for NPD, the pre-treatment of WPC improved the in vitro antioxidant capacity and resulted in a 100% reduction in immunoreactivity to β-lactoglobulin in a shorter processing time. Importantly, bioactive peptides generated by FC displayed an improved ability to induce in vitro arterial relaxation, compared with those obtained from NPD process. Therefore, this study provides innovative evidence regarding how the proteases used for production of whey hydrolysates can improve its biological effects, and discloses the use of high hydrostatic pressure combined with enzymatic hydrolysis as a promising alternative to produce hydrolysates with improved properties.
Abd El-SalamMHEl-ShibinyS. (2019).
Reduction of milk protein antigenicity by enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation. A review. Food Reviews International37(3): 276–295.
2.
AmbrosiVPolentaGGonzalezCFerrariGMarescaP. (2016).
High hydrostatic pressure assisted enzymatic hydrolysis of whey proteins. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies38: 294–301.
3.
Antunes LopesLKern NovelliPFernandez-LafuenteRTardioliPWGiordanoRLC. (2020).
Glyoxyl-activated agarose as support for covalently link Novo-Pro D: Biocatalysts performance in the hydrolysis of casein. Catalysts10(5): 6–8.
4.
AzarkanMMatagneAWattiezRBolleLVandenameeleJBaeyens-VolantD, et al. (2011).
Selective and reversible thiol-pegylation, an effective approach for purification and characterization of five fully active ficin (iso)forms from Ficus carica latex. Phytochemistry72(14–15): 1718–1731.
5.
BelloqueJChicónRLópez-FandiñoR. (2007).
Unfolding and refolding of b-lactoglobulin subjected to high hydrostatic pressure at different Ph values and temperatures and its influence on proteolysis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry55(13): 5282–5288.
6.
BoukilASuwalSChamberlandJPouliotYDoyenA. (2018).
Ultrafiltration performance and recovery of bioactive peptides after fractionation of tryptic hydrolysate generated from pressure-treated b-lactoglobulin. Journal of Membrane Science556: 42–53.
7.
BradfordMM. (1976).
A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry72(1–2): 248–254.
8.
BrandelliADaroitDJCorrêaAPF. (2015).
Whey as a source of peptides with remarkable biological activities. Food Research International73: 149–161.
9.
ChakrabartiSWuJ. (2016).
Bioactive peptides on endothelial function. Food Science and Human Wellness5(1): 1–7.
10.
ChaoDHeRJungSAlukoRE. (2013).
Effect of pressure or temperature pretreatment of isolated pea protein on properties of the enzymatic hydrolysates. Food Research International54(2): 1528–1534.
11.
De CarvalhoNCPessatoT BFernandesL G RZollnerR d LNettoF M. (2017).
Physicochemical characteristics and antigenicity of whey protein hydrolysates obtained with and without pH control. International Dairy Journal71: 24–34.
12.
Da RosaLOLSantanaMCAvezedoTLBrígidaAISGodoyRPachecoS, et al. (2018).
A comparison of dual-functional whey hydrolysates by the use of commercial proteases. Food Science and Technology38(Suppl 1): 31–36.
13.
DevarajKBKumarPRPrakashV. (2008).
Purification, characterization, and solvent-induced thermal stabilization of ficin from Ficus carica. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry56(23): 11417–11423.
14.
Di PierroGO’KeeffeMBPoyarkovALomolinoGFitzGeraldRJ. (2014).
Antioxidant activity of bovine casein hydrolysates produced by Ficus carica L.-derived proteinase. Food Chemistry156: 305–311.
15.
Dupont D and Tomé D (2020) Milk proteins: Digestion and absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. In: Boland M and Singh H (eds) Milk Proteins. From Expression to Food. Third Edit. London, UK: Academic Press, pp. 701–714.
16.
EsmaeilpourMEhsaniMRAminlariM, Shekarforoush S and Hoseini E. (2017).
Antimicrobial peptides derived from goat’s milk whey proteins obtained by enzymatic hydrolysis. Journal of Food Biosciences and Technology7(1): 65–72.
17.
FranckMPerreaultVSuwalSMarciniakABazinetLDoyenA, et al. (2019).
High hydrostatic pressure-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis improved protein digestion of flaxseed protein isolate and generation of peptides with antioxidant activity. Food Research International115: 467–473.
18.
Garcia-MoraPPeñasEFriasJGomezRMartinez-VillaluengaC. (2015).
High-pressure improves enzymatic proteolysis and the release of peptides with angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitory and antioxidant activities from lentil proteins. Food Chemistry171: 224–232.
19.
Garcia-MoraPPeñasEFriasJZielińskiHWiczkowskiWZielińskaD, et al. (2016).
High-pressure-assisted enzymatic release of peptides and phenolics increases angiotensin converting enzyme I inhibitory and antioxidant activities of pinto bean hydrolysates. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry64(8): 1730–1740.
20.
GirgihATChaoDLinLHeRJungSAlukoRE, et al. (2015).
Enzymatic protein hydrolysates from high pressure-pretreated isolated pea proteins have better antioxidant properties than similar hydrolysates produced from heat pretreatment. Food Chemistry188: 510–516.
21.
GoodwinTWMortonRA. (1946).
The spectrophotometric determination of tyrosine and tryptophan in proteins. Biochemical Journal40(5–6): 628–632.
22.
HamdyAMMohranMAHassanAIFahmyMA. (2018).
Effects of heat, ultrasound and microwave pretreatments on the antigenicity of whey protein concentrate (β-lactoglobulin).Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences2018(49): 75–87.
23.
HuppertzTFoxPFKellyAL. (2004).
High pressure-induced denaturation of a-lactalbumin and b-lactoglobulin in bovine milk and whey: A possible mechanism. Journal of Dairy Research71(4): 489–495.
24.
HuppertzTFoxPFde KruifKGKellyAL. (2006).
High pressure-induced changes in bovine milk proteins: A review. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta1764(3): 593–598.
25.
IskandarMLandsLSaballyKAzadiBMeehanBMawjiN, et al. (2015).
High hydrostatic pressure pretreatment of whey protein isolates improves their digestibility and antioxidant capacity. Foods (Basel, Switzerland)4(4): 184–207.
26.
JeewanthiRKCLeeN-KPaikH-D. (2015).
Improved functional characteristics of whey protein hydrolysates in food industry. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources35(3): 350–359.
KimSBKiKSKhanMALeeWSLeeHJAhnBS, et al. (2007).
Peptic and tryptic hydrolysis of native and heated whey protein to reduce its antigenicity. Journal of Dairy Science90(9): 4043–4050.
29.
Le MauxSNongoniermaABBarreCFitzGeraldRJ. (2016).
Enzymatic generation of whey protein hydrolysates under pH-controlled and non pH-controlled conditions: Impact on physicochemical and bioactive properties. Food Chemistry199: 246–251.
30.
MajumderKWuJ. (2015).
Molecular targets of antihypertensive peptides: Understanding the mechanisms of action based on the pathophysiology of hypertension. International Journal of Molecular Sciences16(1): 256–283.
31.
MalufJUFioreseMLMaestreKLDos PassosFRFinklerJKFleckJF, et al. (2020).
Optimization of the porcine liver enzymatic hydrolysis conditions. Journal of Food Process Engineering43(4): 1–12.
32.
MarciniakASuwalSNaderiNPouliotYDoyenA. (2018).
Enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis of food proteins and production of bioactive peptides using high hydrostatic pressure technology. Trends in Food Science & Technology80: 187–198.
33.
Mazorra-ManzanoMARamírez-SuarezJCYadaRY. (2018).
Plant proteases for bioactive peptides release: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition58(13): 2147–2163.
34.
Mellinger-SilvaCRosaLOLStephanMPBrígidaAISCabralLMCda SilvaGO, et al. (2015).
Dual function peptides from pepsin hydrolysates of whey protein isolate. International Dairy Journal48(48): 73–79.
35.
MirallesBAmigoLRecioI. (2018).
Critical review and perspectives on food-derived antihypertensive peptides. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry66(36): 9384–9390.
36.
MoosaviZSMirdamadiSMizaeiMLaripoorM. (2020).
Effects of ultrasonic and high-pressure homogenization pretreatment on the enzymatic hydrolysis and antioxidant activity of yeast protein hydrolysate. Journal of Food Biosciences and Technology10(1): 15–26.
37.
MunirMNadeemMQureshiTMLeongTSHGamlathCJMartinGJO, et al. (2019).
Effects of high pressure, microwave and ultrasound processing on proteins and enzyme activity in dairy systems—A review. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies57: 102192.
38.
NongoniermaABMauxSLEstevenyCFitzGeraldRJ. (2016).
Response surface methodology applied to the generation of casein hydrolysates with antioxidant and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitory properties. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture97(4): 1093–1101.
39.
OzorioLPereiraNRda Silva-SantosJEBrígidaAISMellinger-SilvaCCabralLMC, et al. (2019).
Enzyme inactivation and drying technologies influencing the vasorelaxant activity of a whey protein hydrolysate in semi-pilot scale. International Dairy Journal93: 11–14.
40.
PeñasERestaniPBallabioCPréstamoGFiocchiAGómezR, et al. (2006).
Assessment of the residual immunoreactivity of soybean whey hydrolysates obtained by combined enzymatic proteolysis and high pressure. European Food Research and Technology222(3–4): 286–290.
41.
PerreaultVHénauxLBazinetLDoyenA. (2017).
Pretreatment of flaxseed protein isolate by high hydrostatic pressure: Impacts on protein structure, enzymatic hydrolysis and final hydrolysate antioxidant capacities. Food Chemistry221: 1805–1812.
42.
PiccolominiAFIskandarMMLandsLCKubowS. (2012).
High hydrostatic pressure pre-treatment of they proteins enhances whey protein hydrolysate inhibition of oxidative stress and IL-8 secretion in intestinal epithelial cells. Food & Nutrition Research56(1): 17549–17569.
SinghARamaswamyHS. (2014).
Effect of high-pressure treatment on trypsin hydrolysis and antioxidant activity of egg white proteins. International Journal of Food Science & Technology49(1): 269–279.
45.
UdenigweCCMohanA. (2014).
Mechanisms of food protein-derived antihypertensive peptides other than ACE inhibition. Journal of Functional Foods8(1): 45–52.
46.
YadavJSSYanSPilliSKumarLTyagiRDSurampalliRY, et al. (2015).
Cheese whey: A potential resource to transform into bioprotein, functional/nutritional proteins and bioactive peptides. Biotechnology Advances33(6): 756–774.
47.
ZhengHShenXBuGLuoY. (2008).
Effects of pH, temperature and enzyme-to-substrate ratio on the antigenicity of whey protein hydrolysates prepared by alcalase. International Dairy Journal18(10–11): 1028–1082.
48.
ZhouHWangCYeJTaoRChenHCaoF, et al. (2016).
Effects of enzymatic hydrolysis assisted by high hydrostatic pressure processing on the hydrolysis and allergenicity of proteins from ginkgo seeds. Food and Bioprocess Technology9(5): 839–848.
49.
ZuluetaAEsteveMJFrígolaA. (2009).
ORAC and TEAC assays comparison to measure the antioxidant capacity of food products. Food Chemistry114(1): 310–316.
