The aim of this study was to assess physicochemical properties and sensory acceptance of snack bars (SBs) made with different levels of maize biomass flour (MBF), rice flakes (RF) and oat flakes (OF). A simplex design was used, with 6 mixtures and 2 repetitions. The different levels of MBF, RF and OF used in the SBs influenced all physicochemical properties evaluated (moisture, water activity, specific volume, hardness and instrumental color). SB4 (containing 14.85:5:10.85% of MBF:RF:OF, respectively) and SB6 (containing 14:8:8% of MBF:RF:OF, respectively) were the closest to the desirable formulation according to the desirability diagram for the physicochemical properties of the SBs. SB1 (containing 20:5:5% of MBF:RF:OF, respectively) was also selected for sensory analysis as it showed the highest MBF content among all formulations. None SBs presented a microbiological risk. The SB6 presented the highest sensory acceptance and purchase intent, highlighting its rich content of dietary fiber (16.45 ± 0.1 g/100 g) and protein (7.04 ± 0.02 g/100 g) besides its low-calorie characteristic (1421.22 kJ/100 g/339.68 kcal/100 g). The development of SBs using MBF is feasible in relation to their physicochemical and sensory properties, which can stimulate the sustainable production of new goods from this by-product.
AACC. Approved Methods of Analysis. method 66-50. 11th ed. St Paul: American Association of Cereal Chemists, 2010.
2.
AgbajeRHassanCZArifinN, et al. (2014). Sensory preference and mineral contents of cereal bars made from glutinous rice flakes and Sunnah foods. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology8: 26–31.
3.
AigsterADuncanSEConfortiFD, et al. (2011). Physicochemical properties and sensory attributes of resistant starch-supplemented granola bars and cereals. LWT - Food Sci Technol44: 2159–2165.
4.
AOAC. (2012). Official Methods of Analysis, 20th edWashington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
5.
AppeltPCunhaMdGuerraAP, et al. (2015). Development and characterization of cereal bars made with flour of jabuticaba peel and okara. Acta Sci Technol37: 117–122.
6.
AravindNSissonsMFellowsCM. (2012). Effect of soluble fibre (guar gum and carboxymethylcellulose) addition on technological, sensory and structural properties of durum wheat spaghetti. Food Chemistry131: 893–900.
7.
Barros NetoBdScarminioISBrunsRE. (2003) Como Fazer Experimentos: Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento na Ciência e na Indústria, 2nd edCampinas: Editora Unicamp.
8.
BchirBJean-FrançoisTRabetafikaHN, et al. (2018). Effect of pear apple and date fibres incorporation on the physico-chemical, sensory, nutritional characteristics and the acceptability of cereal bars. Food Science and Technology International24: 198–208.
9.
Brasil. Agência nacional de vigilância sanitária (ANVISA). Resolution RDC ANVISA/MS no 12, of 2nd January 2001.
10.
Brasil. Agência nacional de vigilância sanitária (ANVISA). Resolution RDC ANVISA/MS no 54, 12th November 2012.
11.
ChenLOparaUL. (2013). Approaches to analysis and modeling texture in fresh and processed foods - A review. Journal of Food Engineering119: 497–507.
12.
CorrêaPCGoneliALDJarenC, et al. (2007). Sorption isotherms and isosteric heat of peanut pods, kernels and hulls. Food Science and Technology International13: 231–238.
13.
CzerwinskiJBartnikowskaELeontowiczH, et al. (2004). Oat (Avena sativa L.) and amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) meals positively affect plasma lipid profile in rats fed cholesterol- containing diets. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry15: 622–629.
14.
DeckerEARoseDJStewartD. (2014). Processing of oats and the impact of processing operations on nutrition and health benefits. British Journal of Nutrition112: 58–64.
15.
DhingraDMichaelMRajputH, et al. (2012). Dietary fibre in foods: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology49: 255–266.
16.
ErgunRLiethaRHartelRW. (2010). Moisture and shelf life in sugar confections. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition50: 162–192.
17.
FAO (2003). Food energy – methods of analysis and conversion factors – FAO food and nutrition paper 77. Food and Agriculture Organization: 13–59.
18.
FDA (2002). Bacteriological analytical manual: chapters 5, 13, 18. Food and Drug Administration.
19.
FernandesFANRodriguesS. (2007). Ultrasound as pre-treatment for drying of fruits: dehydration of banana. Journal of Food Engineering82: 261–267.
20.
FernandesSSSalas-MelladoMdlM. (2017). Addition of chia seed mucilage for reduction of fat content in bread and cakes. Food Chemistry227: 237–244.
21.
GarciaMCLobatoLPBenassiMdT, et al. (2012). Application of roasted rice bran in cereal bars. Food Science and Technology32: 718–724.
22.
GhorbaniMHosseiniH. (2017). Determination of water activity corresponding to the proper quality of peanut kernels. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation41: 1–8.
23.
GuimarãesRRFreitasMdSilvaVd. (2010). Simple cakes elaborated with flour of watermelon inner skin (Citrullus vulgaris, sobral): Chemical, physical, and sensory evaluation. Cienc e Tecnol Aliment30: 354–363.
24.
Harrington JuniorEC. (1965). The desirability function. Ind Qual Control21: 494–498.
25.
HuQPXuJG. (2011). Profiles of carotenoids, anthocyanins, phenolics, and antioxidant activity of selected color waxy corn grains during maturation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry59: 2026–2033.
26.
JeddouKBBouazizFZouari-EllouziS, et al. (2017). Improvement of texture and sensory properties of cakes by addition of potato peel powder with high level of dietary fiber and protein. Food Chemistry217: 668–677.
27.
KhouryiehHAramouniF. (2013). Effect of flaxseed flour incorporation on the physical properties and consumer acceptability of cereal bars. Food Science and Technology International19: 549–556.
28.
MarquesTRCorrêaADde Carvalho AlvesAP, et al. (2015). Cereal bars enriched with antioxidant substances and rich in fiber, prepared with flours of acerola residues. Journal of Food Science and Technology52: 5084–5092.
29.
McGuireRG. (1992). Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience27: 1254–1255.
30.
MohamadRNohNFMMohamadSS. (2014). Consumer preferences and purchasing intention towards a new healthy snack product. Econ Technol Manag Rev (9b): 123–132.
31.
MontanariSRLeite JúniorBdCMartinsML, et al. (2020). In vitro gastrointestinal digestion of a peanut, soybean, guava and beet beverage supplemented with Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Food Bioscience36: 100623.
32.
MudgilDBarakS. (2013). Composition, properties and health benefits of indigestible carbohydrate polymers as dietary fiber: A review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules61: 1–6.
33.
MunhozCLGuimarãesRdCNozakiVT, et al. (2014). Preparation of a cereal bar containing bocaiuva: Physical, nutritional, microbiological and sensory evalution. Acta Sci Technol36: 553–560.
34.
Oliveira JuniorGdCostaNMBMartinoHSD, et al. (2014). Chemical composition and effects of micronized corn bran on iron bioavailability in rats. Food Science and Technology34: 616–622.
35.
PaivaAPBarcelosMdFPereiraJdA, et al. (2012). Characterization of food bars manufactured with agroindustrial by-products and waste. Ciência e Agrotecnologia36: 333–340.
36.
ParamasivamSKDavidAKMarimuthu SomasundaramS, et al. (2021). Influence of food hydrocolloids on the structural, textural and chemical characteristics of low-fat banana chips. Food Science and Technology International: 1–13.
37.
PăuceanAManSPopA. (2015). Development of oat based-food formulation and quality characteristics. J Agroaliment Process Technol21: 261–266.
38.
Ramírez-JiménezAKGaytán-MartínezMMorales-SánchezE, et al. (2018). Functional properties and sensory value of snack bars added with common bean flour as a source of bioactive compounds. LWT - Food Sci Technol89: 674–680.
39.
RodriguezACTorrez IrigoyenMRNavarroAS, et al. (2017). Obtention and characterization of dried gels prepared with whey proteins, honey and hydrocolloids mixture. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture97: 4969–4977.
40.
SeraglioSKTSchulzMGonzagaLV, et al. (2021). Current status of the gastrointestinal digestion effects on honey: A comprehensive review. Food Chemistry357: 129807.
41.
SilvaAdFGirondiLMPimentelTC, et al. (2016). Cereal bar with cassava bagasse: Chemical composition and sensory acceptance. Brazilian J Food Res7: 42–52.
42.
SinghBSinghJPKaurA, et al. (2016). Bioactive compounds in banana and their associated health benefits - A review. Food Chemistry206: 1–11.
43.
SousaMdGuimarãesRMAraújoMdO, et al. (2019). Characterization of corn (Zea mays L.) bran as a new food ingredient for snack bars. LWT - Food Sci Technol101: 812–818.
44.
SrebernichSMGonçalvesGMSOrmeneseRdC, et al. (2016). Physico-chemical, sensory and nutritional characteristics of cereal bars with addition of acacia gum, inulin and sorbitol. Food Science and Technology36: 555–562.
45.
StatSoft (2007) Statistica 7.0. Tulsa, USA: Stat Soft Inc.
Sun-WaterhouseDTeohAMassarottoC, et al. (2010). Comparative analysis of fruit-based functional snack bars. Food Chemistry119: 1369–1379.
48.
WangNPanDGuoZ, et al. (2021). Effects of guar gum on blood lipid levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized clinical trials. Journal of Functional Foods85: 104605.
49.
ZhangJLiMLiC, et al. (2019). Effect of wheat bran insoluble dietary fiber with different particle size on the texture properties, protein secondary structure, and microstructure of noodles. Grain Oil Sci Technol2: 97–102.
