This article presents a qualitative study of ICT use among Finnish young people attending training programmes for youth outside employment and education. The data come from six focus group interviews and three individual interviews, as well as a single focus group interview with involved supervisors. The data was analyzed using McQuail’s (1983) theory regarding the motives for individual media use. The results show that the young people use ICT primarily for entertainment, but their use is diverse. Young people choose the tools and dimensions for interaction that best fulfill their needs, blending together ingredients from both online and offline sources. Unlike previous research, young people in this study stated that they prefer talking to someone face-to-face about severe (health-related or emotional) problems. If social and youth services want to meet young people on their own terms, both online and offline services are needed.
ArnesenAne-LiseLisbethLundahl (2006) ‘Still Social and Democratic? Inclusive Education Policies in the Nordic Welfare States’, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research50(3): 285–300, doi: 10.1080/00313830600743316.
2.
BarbosaNevesMonteiro de MatosBarbaraRenteJoãoRitaSaraLopes Martin (2015) ‘The “Non-aligned”: Young People’s Narratives of Rejection of Social Networking Sites’, Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research23(2): 116–35, doi: 10.1177/1103308815569393.
3.
BlumlerJay E.ElihuKatz (1974) The Use of Mass Communication. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
4.
BoydDanah (2008) ‘Why Youth <3 Social Media Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life’, in DavidBuckingham (ed.) Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, pp. 119–42. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
5.
CarrNicholas (2011) The Shallows. What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains. New York and London: Norton.
6.
CamposRicardoSimõesJosé Alberto (2014) ‘Digital Participation at the Margins: Online Circuits of Rap Music by Portuguese Afro-descendant Youth’, Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research22(1): 87–106, doi: 10.1177/1103308813512931.
7.
CollinPhilippaKittyRahillyIngridRichardsonAmandaThird (2011) The Benefits of Social Networking Services. Melbourne: Cooperative Research Center for Young People, Technology and Wellbeing. URL (consulted 25June2015): http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/11804/
8.
CranmerSue (2010) ‘Listening to Excluded Young People’s Perspectives on How Digital Technologies Support and Challenge Their Lives’, Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice19(4): 31–48.
9.
Figueras BatesCarolina (2014) ‘I am a Waste of Breath, of Space, of Time: Metaphors of Self in a Pro-Anorexia Group’, Qualitative Health Research, doi: 10.1177/1049732314550004.
10.
GilesDavid (2006) ‘Constructing Identities in Cyberspace: The Case of Eating Disorders’, British Journal of Social Psychology45(3): 463–77, doi:10.1348/014466605X53596.
11.
GowenL. Kris (2013) ‘Online Mental Health Information Seeking in Young Adults with Mental Health Challenges’, Journal of Technology in Human Services31(2): 97–111.
12.
GranholmCamilla (2010) ‘Virtuaalinen auttamisympäristö voimaannuttavan vuorovaikutuksen ja sosiaalisen tuen tarjoajana’ [Social support and empowering bonding in supporting online environments]. In PohjolaAnneliKääriäinenAinoKuusisto-NiemiSirpa, (eds) Sosiaalityö, tieto ja teknologia [Social work, Knowledge and Technology], pp. 157–81. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
13.
HerringSusan C. (2008) ‘Questioning the Generational Divide: Technological Exoticism and Adult Constructions of Online Youth Identity’, in DavidBuckingham (ed.) Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, pp. 71–92. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
14.
JohnsenJan-Arne K.RosenvingeJan H.DeedeGammon (2002) ‘Online Group Interaction and Mental Health: An Analysis of Three Online Discussion Forums’, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology43(5): 445–49.
15.
KilianThomasNadineHennigsSaschaLanger (2012) ‘Do Millennials Read Books or Blogs? Introducing a Media Usage Typology of the Internet Generation’, Journal of Consumer Marketing29(2): 114–24, doi:10.1108/07363761211206366.
16.
LeeLisa (2005) ‘Young People and the Internet: From Theory to Practice’, Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research13(4): 315–26, doi: 10.117771103308805057050.
17.
LimSun SunChanYoke HianVadrevuShobhaIcchaBasnyat (2013) ‘Managing Peer Relationships Online—Investigating the Use of Facebook by Juvenile Delinquents and Youths-at-Risk’, Computers in Human Behavior29(1): 8–15, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.025.
18.
LindforsPirjoSolantausTyttiRimpeläArja, (2012) ‘Fears for the Future among Finnish Adolescents in 1983–2007: From Global Concerns to Ill Health and Loneliness’, Journal of Adolescence35(4): 991–99, doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.003.
19.
LiuFengshu (2011) ‘Wired for Fun Narratives by Members of China’s E-generation’, Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research19(1): 69–89, doi: 10.1177/110330881001900105.
20.
LivingstoneSoniaLeslieHaddonAnkeGörzigKjartanÓlafsson (2011) Risks and Safety on the Internet: The Perspectives of European Children: Full Findings. London: EU Kids Online. URL (consulted 19March2015): http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/
21.
MatzatUweBertSadowski (2011) ‘Does the “Do-it-Yourself Approach” Reduce Digital Inequality? Evidence of Self-learning of Digital Skills’, The Information Society28(1): 1–12, doi: 10.1080/01972243.2011.629023.
22.
McQuailDenis (1983) Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction. London/Beverly Hills, CA/New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
23.
McQuailDenis . (1987) Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction, second edition. London: SAGE.
24.
McQuailDenisMichaelGurevitch (1974) ‘Explaining Audience Behavior: Three Approaches Considered’, in BlumlerJay E.KatzElihu (eds) The Use of Mass Communication, pp. 287–302. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
25.
MeyenMichael (2004) Mediennutzung: Mediaforschung, medienfunktionen, nutzungsmuster [Use of Media: Media Research, Media Functions, Usage Patterns]. Konstanz: UVK.
26.
MishnaFayeMarionBogoRootJenniferSawyerJami-LeighMonaKhoury-Kassabri (2012) ‘“It Just Crept in”: The Digital Age and Implications for Social Work Practice’, Clinical Social Work Journal40(3): 277–86, doi: 10.1007/s10615-012-0383-4.
27.
Official Statistics of Finland (2013) ‘Väestöntieto- javiestintätekniikankäyttö 2013’ [The Use of Information- and Communication Technology among the Population]. URL (consulted6December2014): http://www.stat.fi/til/sutivi/2013/sutivi_2013_2013-11-07_fi.pdf.
OksamaVirpiJussiTurtiainen (2004) ‘Mobile Communication as a Social Stage: Meanings of Mobile Communication in Everyday Life among Teenagers in Finland’, New Media & Society6(3): 319–39.
30.
PrenskyMarc (2001) ‘Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1’, On the horizon9(5): 1–6, doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816.
31.
RinneRistoTeroJärvinen (2011) ‘Dropout and Completion in Upper Secondary Education in Finland’, in StephenLambMarkussenEifredRichardTeeseSandbergNinaJohnPolesel (eds) School Dropout and Completion, pp. 215–32. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.
32.
SihvonenJenniina (2015) ‘Media Consumption and the Identity Projects of the Young’, Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research23(2): 171–89, doi: 10.1177/1103308815569391.
33.
SöderströmSylvia (2009) ‘Offline Social Ties and Online Use of Computers: A Study of Disabled Youth and their Use of ICT Advances’, New Media & Society11(5): 709–27.
34.
SpurgeonChristinaLizFerrierLisaGundersPhilGraham (2012) ‘Young Citizens, Values and New/s Media’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies26(6): 911–22, doi: 10.1080/10304312.2012.734598.
35.
StaldGitte (2008) ‘Mobile Identity: Youth, Identity, and Mobile Communication Media’, in DavidBuckingham (ed.) Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, pp. 143–64. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
36.
SteyaertJanNickGould (2009) ‘Social Work and the Changing Face of the Digital Divide’, British Journal of Social Work39(4): 740–53.
37.
TapscottDon (1998) Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
ThulinEvaBertilVilhelmson (2007) ‘Mobiles Everywhere: Youth, the Mobile Phone, and Changes in Everyday Practice’, Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research15(3): 235–53, doi: 10.1177/110330880701500302.
39.
TracySarah J. (2013) Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
40.
TuomiJouniAnneliSarajärvi (2002) Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi [Qualitative research and content analysis]. Helsinki: Tammi.
41.
TurkleSherry (2011) Alone Together. Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
42.
Van DeursenAlexander J.A.M.van DijkJan A.G.M.OscarPeters (2011) ‘Rethinking Internet Skills: The Contribution of Gender, Age, Education, Internet Experience, and Hours Online to Medium- and Content-related Internet Skills’, Poetics39(2): 125–44. DOI: 10/1016/j.poetic.2011.02.001.
43.
Van DeursenAlexander J.A.M.van DijkJan A.G.M.tenKloosterPeter M. (2015) ‘Increasing Inequalities in What We Do Online: A Longitudinal Cross Sectional Analysis of Internet Activities among the Dutch Population (2010 to 2013) over Gender, Age, Education, and Income’, Telematics and Informatics30(2): 259–72, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2014.09.003.
44.
VanttajaM.JärvinenTero (2006) ‘The Young Outsiders: The Later Life Courses of “Drop-out Youths”’, International Journal of Lifelong Education25(2): 173–84.
45.
WestlundOscarJacobBjur (2014) ‘The Media Life of the Young’, Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research22(1): 21–41, doi: 10.1177/1103308813512934.
46.
WildermuthNorbertDalsgaardAnne Line (2006) ‘Imagined Futures, Present Lives: Youth, Media and Modernity in the Changing Economy of Northeast Brazil’, Young: Nordic Journal of Youth research14(1): 9–31, doi: 101177/1103308806059811.
47.
YbarraMichele L.EatonWilliam W. (2005) ‘Internet-based Mental Health Interventions’, Mental Health Service Research7(2): 75–87, doi: 10/1007/s11020-005-3779-8.
