The process of self-presentation is significantly complicated for people growing up with social media. Many individuals have time-stamped digital footprints in social media from early youth to adulthood. However, little is known about long-term consequences for these individuals, their experience of time and their identity transition from youthful experimentation to a professional identity in social media. Through 15 in-depth interviews, our study explores challenges concerning identity transition and impression management in social media for young adults who have recently entered working life as journalists. Our participants described how they curated their image and self-censored both their previous and current self-generated content in social media. We also find that many have actively opted for passive and peace-keeping self-presentation and use of social media or for turning their usage into private messaging platforms, masking their online identity. Some participants indicated they felt trapped by their own identity making in social media.
AltmanI. (1975). The environment of social behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
2.
AnsellN. (2016). Children, youth and development. London: Routledge.
3.
BanajiM. R.PrenticeD. A. (1994). The self in social contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 45(1), 297–332.
4.
boydd. (2007). Why youth social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In BuckinghamD. (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5.
boydd. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In PapacharissiZ. (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
boydd. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
boydd. (2015). Social media: A phenomenon to be analyzed. Social Media + Society, 1(1). DOI:10.1177/2056305115580148
8.
BrandtzaegP. B. (2016). The social media natives: The relationship between young peoples’ media user type and their media use at school. In ElstadE. (Ed.), Digital expectations and experiences in education (pp. 149–162). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
9.
BrandtzaegP. B.LüdersM. (2018). Time collapse in social media: Extending the context collapse. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 1–10. DOI:10.1177/2056305118763349
10.
DavisJ. L.JurgensonN. (2014). Context collapse: Theorizing context collusions and collisions. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 476–485.
11.
DeVitoM. A.BirnholtzJ.HancockJ. T.FrenchM.LiuS. (2018). How people form folk theories of social media feeds and what it means for how we study self-presentation. Paper presented at the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 120). New York, NY: ACM.
12.
EriksonE. H. (1994). Identity: Youth and crisis (Austen Riggs Monograph No. 7). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
13.
ForteA.DickardM.MageeR.DeniseE. (2014). What do teens ask their online social networks? Social search practices among high school students. Paper presented at the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 28–37). New York, NY: ACM.
14.
FurlongA. (Ed.). (2016). Routledge handbook of youth and young adulthood. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.
15.
GardnerH.DavisK. (2013). The app generation: How today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
16.
GearhartS.ZhangW. (2015). ‘Was it something I said?’ ‘No, it was something you posted!’: A study of the spiral of silence theory in social media contexts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(4), 208–213. DOI:10.1089/cyber.2014.0443
17.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor.
18.
GreenhowC.RobeliaB. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1130–1161. DOI:10.1111/j.1083–6101.2009.01484.x
19.
GreifenederE.PontisS.BlandfordA.AttallaH.NealD.SchlebbeK. (2018). ‘Researchers’ attitudes towards the use of social networking sites. Journal of Documentation, 74(1), 119–136.
20.
GriceH. P. (1941). Personal identity. Mind, 50(200), 330–350.
21.
GrieveR.WatkinsonJ. (2016). The psychological benefits of being authentic on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(7), 420–425.
22.
HerringS. C. (2008). Questioning the generational divide: Technological exoticism and adult constructions of online youth identity. In BuckinghamD. (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 71–94). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
HoganB. (2010). The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 377–386. DOI:10.1177/0270467610385893
24.
KaplanA. M.HaenleinM. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
25.
LeaverT.HighfieldT. (2016). Visualising the ends of identity: Pre-birth and post-death on Instagram. Information, Communication & Society, 21(1), 30–45.
26.
LeeA. M. (2015). Social media and speed-driven journalism: Expectations and practices. International Journal on Media Management, 17(4), 217–239.
27.
LindlofT. RTaylorB. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
28.
LivingstoneS. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393–411.
29.
LoaderB. D.VromenA.XenosM. A. (2016). Performing for the young networked citizen? Celebrity politics, social networking and the political engagement of young people. Media, Culture & Society, 38(3), 400–419.
30.
MarwickA. E.boydd. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.
31.
MarwickA. Eboydd. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7), 1051–1067.
MeyrowitzJ. (1986). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
MoriokaT.EllisonN. B.BrownM. (2016). Identity work on social media sites: Disadvantaged students’ college transition processes. Paper presented at the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 848–859). New York, NY: ACM.
36.
Niemann-LenzJ. (2018). Do adolescents and emerging adults reduce their privacy voluntarily? A theory of reasoned action approach to explain self-disclosure on Facebook. In KochT.HoferM.DohleM.HartmannT. (Eds.), Youth and media (pp. 75–96). Baden Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
PitcanM.MarwickA. E.boydd. (2018). Performing a vanilla self: Respectability politics, social class, and the digital world. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(3), 163–179. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy008
RogstadI. D. (2014). Political news journalists in social media: Transforming political reporters into political pundits?Journalism Practice, 8(6), 688–703.
41.
SassonH.MeschG. (2014). Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 32–38.
42.
SchlenkerB. R.WowraS. A. (2003). Carryover effects of feeling socially transparent or impenetrable on strategic self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 871.
43.
SchoenebeckS.EllisonN. B.BlackwellL.BayerJ. B.FalkE. B. (2016). Playful backstalking and serious impression management: How young adults reflect on their past identities on Facebook. Paper presented at 19th ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1475–1487). New York, NY: ACM.
44.
SteensenS. (2016). The intimization of journalism. In WitschgeT.AndersonC. W.DomingoD.HermidaA. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of digital journalism (pp. 113–127). London: SAGE Publications.
45.
StuartH. C.DabbishL.KieslerS.KinnairdP.KangR. (2012). Social transparency in networked information exchange: A theoretical framework. Paper presented at the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 451–460). New York, NY: ACM.
46.
SvoenBGiljeØ. (2012). Policy making and practices of production across contexts of learning. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 7(04), 284–300.
47.
TannerA. H.FriedmanD. B.ZhengY. (2015). Influences on the construction of health news: The reporting practices of local television news health journalists. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(2), 359–376.
48.
ThomasL.BriggsP.HartA.KerriganF. (2017). Understanding social media and identity work in young people transitioning to university. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 541–553.
49.
VitakJ. (2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 451–470. DOI:10.1080/08838151.2012.732140
50.
VitakJ.KimJ. (2014). You can’t block people offline: Examining how Facebook’s affordances shape the disclosure process. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 461–474. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2531672
ZhaoX.SalehiN.NaranjitS. (2013). The many faces of Facebook: Experiencing social media as performance, exhibition, and personal archive. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Human Factors in Computing, CHI ‘15. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2470656
