Designed to Succeed: Dimensions of Product Design and Their Impact on Market Share

Abstract

This research examines the relationship between product design and market share, a topic of considerable significance that has not been addressed in the published literature. Drawing from diverse disciplines such as marketing, industrial design, and engineering, the authors conceptualize design as being composed of three distinct product-level dimensions: function, form, and ergonomics. Furthermore, the authors examine the interplay among these design dimensions and their impact on the market share of a product. Empirical results using integrated repeated cross-sectional data obtained from several different sources in the U.S. light vehicle industry reveal an important strategic trade-off concerning design capabilities. Firms can either “design for satisfaction,” by investing in both function and ergonomics, or “design for delight,” by investing in form design capabilities so as to reap share rewards. The authors also show that older-generation vehicles with superior form designs do much better in terms of share than corresponding older vehicles with higher levels of either function or ergonomics. Implications of these results for academic researchers and managers are discussed.

Keywords

product design ergonomics new products mixed models auto industry

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

Leona S.

and West

Stephen G.

(1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. London: Sage Publications.

Barnett

Arnold I.

(1976), “More on a Market Share Theorem,” Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (February), 104–09.

Bayus

Barry L.

(1998), “An Analysis of Product Lifetimes in a Technologically Dynamic Industry,” Management Science, 44 (6), 763–75.

Bell

David E.

, Keeney

Ralph L.

, and Little

John D.C.

(1975), “A Market Share Theorem,” Journal of Marketing Research, 12 (May), 136–41.

Berlyne

D.E.

(1970), “Novelty, Complexity, and Hedonic Value,” Perception & Psychophysics, 8 (5), 279–86.

Bloch

Peter H.

(1995), “Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response,” Journal of Marketing, 59 (July), 16–29.

Bloch

Peter H.

(2011), “Product Design and Marketing: Reflections After Fifteen Years,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (July), 378–81.

Buzzell

Robert D.

and Wiersema

Frederik D.

(1981), “Modelling Changes in Market Share: A Cross-Sectional Analysis,” Strategic Management Journal, 2 (1), 27–42.

Chandy

Rajesh K.

and Tellis

Gerard J.

(1998), “Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize,” Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (November), 474–87.

10.

Chitturi

Ravindra

, Raghunathan

Rajagopal

, and Mahajan

Vijay

(2007), “Form Versus Function: How the Intensities of Specific Emotions Evoked in Functional Versus Hedonic Trade-Offs Mediate Product Preferences,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (November), 702–14.

11.

Chitturi

Ravindra

, Raghunathan

Rajagopal

, and Mahajan

Vijay

(2008), “Delight by Design: The Role of Hedonic Versus Utilitarian Benefits,” Journal of Marketing, 72 (May), 48–63.

12.

Cho, Hallie S., Sameer Hasija, and Manuel Sosa (2015), “How Important Is Design for the Automobile Value Chain?” Working Paper No. 2015/86/TOM, INSEAD.

13.

Crawford

Merle

and Di Benedetto

Anthony

(2010), New Products Management, 10th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

14.

Creusen

Marielle

and Schoormans

Jan

(2005), “The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22 (1), 63–81.

15.

De Albuquerque Campos

L.F.

, de Lima Lanutti

J.N.

, and Paschoarelli

L.C.

(2012), “Product Functions: Interfaces with Ergonomic Design,” Work (Reading, Mass.), 41, 960–63.

16.

Gelb

Betsy D.

and Krishnamurthy

Partha

(2008), “Protect Your Product's Look and Feel from Imitators,” Harvard Business Review, 86 (10), 36.

17.

Gourville, John T. (2005), “Note on Innovation Diffusion: Rogers’ Five Factors,” Background Note 505-075, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.

18.

Hagtvedt

Henrik

and Patrick

Vanessa M.

(2014), “Consumer Response to Overstyling: Balancing Aesthetics and Functionality in Product Design,” Psychology and Marketing, 31 (7), 518–25.

19.

Hellofs

Linda L.

and Jacobson

Robert

(1999), “Market Share and Customers’ Perceptions of Quality: When Can Firms Grow Their Way to Higher Versus Lower Quality?” Journal of Marketing, 63 (January), 16–25.

20.

Hirschmann

Elizabeth

(1983), “Aesthetics, Ideologies, and the Limits of the Marketing Concept,” Journal of Marketing, 47 (July), 45–55.

21.

Hoegg

JoAndrea

and Alba

Joseph W.

(2011), “Seeing Is Believing (Too Much): The Influence of Product Form on Perceptions of Functional Performance,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (3), 346–59.

22.

Hoegg

JoAndrea

, Alba

Joseph W.

, and Dahl

Darren W.

(2010), “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Influence of Aesthetics on Product Feature Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20 (4), 419–30.

23.

Homburg

Christian

, Schwemmle

Martin

, and Kuehnl

Christina

(2015), “New Product Design: Concept, Measurement, and Consequences,” Journal of Marketing, 79 (May), 41–56.

24.

Kaljun

Jasmin

and Dolsak

Bojan

(2011), “Artificial Intelligence in Aesthetic and Ergonomic Product Design Process,” in MIPRO, 2011 Proceedings of the 34th International Convention. Opatija, Croatia: IEEE Conference Publications, 959–64.

25.

Keller

Kevin Lane

(1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (January), 1–22.

26.

Landwehr

Jan R.

, Labroo

Aparna A.

, and Herrmann

Andreas

(2011), “Gut Liking for the Ordinary: Incorporating Design Fluency Improves Automobile Sales Forecasts,” Marketing Science, 30 (3), 416–29.

27.

Lawson

Bryan

(2005), How Designers Think, 4th ed. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

28.

Lojacono

Gabriella

and Zaccai

Gianfranco

(2004), “The Evolution of the Design-Inspired Enterprise,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 45 (3), 75–79.

29.

Stephen C.-Y.

and Suh

Nam-Pyo

(2009), “Complexity in Design of Technical Systems,” CIRP Annals: Manufacturing Technology, 58 (1), 157–60.

30.

Martin

Roger L.

(2009), The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking Is the Next Competitive Advantage. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

31.

Montini

Laura

(2014), “How Better Design Can Get People to Try Your Brand,” Inc., (accessed January 6, 2015), [available at http://www.inc.com/laura-montini/infographic/the-future-of-experience-design.html].

32.

Moon

Hakil

, Park

Jeongdoo

, and Kim

Sangkyun

(2015), “The Importance of an Innovative Product Design on Customer Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32 (2), 224–32.

33.

Noble

Charles H.

and Kumar

Minu

(2008), “Using Product Design Strategically to Create Deeper Consumer Connections,” Business Horizons, 51 (5), 441–50.

34.

Noble

Charles H.

and Kumar

Minu

(2010), “Exploring the Appeal of Product Design: A Grounded Value-Based Model of Key Design Elements and Relationships,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27 (5), 640–57.

35.

Norman

Donald A.

(2005), Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.

36.

Priem

Richard L.

(2007), “A Consumer Perspective on Value Creation,” Academy of Management Review, 32 (1), 219–35.

37.

Rindfleisch

Aric

and Jeffrey Inman

(1998), “Explaining the Familiarity-Liking Relationship: Mere Exposure, Information Availability, or Social Desirability?” Marketing Letters, 9 (1), 5–19.

38.

Rindova

Violina P.

and Petkova

Antoaneta P.

(2007), “When Is a New Thing a Good Thing? Technological Change, Product Form Design, and Perceptions of Value for Product Innovations,” Organization Science, 18 (2), 217–32.

39.

Rubera

Gaia

(2015), “Design Innovativeness and Product Sales’ Evolution,” Marketing Science, 34 (1), 98–115.

40.

SAS (2008), SAS/STAT 9.2 User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

41.

Srinivasan

Raji

, Lilien

Gary L.

, Rangaswamy

Arvind

, Pingitore

Gina M.

, and Seldin

(2012), “The Total Product Design Concept and an Application to the Auto Market,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (S1), 3–20.

42.

Stroup

Walter W.

(2013), Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

43.

Tosi

(2012), “Ergonomics and Sustainability in the Design of Everyday Use Products,” Work (Reading, Mass.), 41, 3878–82.

44.

Townsend

Janell D.

, Montoya

Mitzi M.

, and Calantone

Roger J.

(2011), “Form and Function: A Matter of Perspective,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (3), 374–77.

45.

Verganti

(2006), “Innovating Through Design,” Harvard Business Review, 84 (12), 114–22.

46.

Veryzer

Robert W.

Jr. (1995), “The Place of Product Design and Aesthetics in Consumer Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 22, Kardes

Frank R.

and Sujan

Mita

, eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 641–45.

47.

Veryzer

Robert W.

Jr. and Wesley Hutchinson

(1998), “The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 374–94.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.05 MB

0.00 MB