Although the number and importance of joint innovation projects between suppliers and their customers continue to rise, the literature has yet to resolve a key question: Do embedded ties with customers help or hurt supplier innovation? Drawing on both the tie strength and knowledge literatures, the authors theorize that embedded ties interact with supplier and customer innovation knowledge to influence supplier innovation. In a sample of 157 Dutch business-to-business innovation relationships, they observe that embedded ties weaken how much suppliers benefit from customer innovation knowledge because of worries about customer opportunism (the dark side of embedded ties). However, they uncover three moderating relationship and governance features that allow suppliers to overcome these dark-side effects and even increase innovation (the bright side of embedded ties). Finally, although the authors predicted a bright-side effect, they find that embedded ties neither help nor hinder the supplier to leverage its own innovation knowledge in the relationship.
AchrolRavi S., and KotlerPhilip (1999), “Marketing in the Network Economy,”Journal of Marketing, 63(Special Issue), 146–63.
2.
AhujaGautam (2000), “Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–55.
3.
AikenLeona S., and WestStephen G. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
4.
AndersonErin, and JapSandy D. (2005), “The Dark Side of Close Relationships,”MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3), 75–82.
5.
AndersonErin, and WeitzBarton (1989), “Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads,”Marketing Science, 8(4), 310–23.
6.
AndersonJames C., HåkanssonHåkan, and JohansonJan (1994), “Dyadic Business Relationships Within a Business Network Context,”Journal of Marketing, 58(October), 1–15.
7.
ArmstrongJ. Scott, and OvertonTerry S. (1977), “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys,”Journal of Marketing Research, 14(August), 396–402.
8.
Atuahene-GimaKwaku, and KoAnthony (2001), “An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation,”Organization Science, 12(1), 54–74.
9.
BagozziRichard P. (1980), Causal Models in Marketing.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
BagozziRichard P., and YiYoujae (1988), “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.
11.
BensaouM., and AndersonErin (1999), “Buyer–Supplier Relations in Industrial Markets: When Do Buyers Risk Making Idiosyncratic Investments?”Organization Science, 10(4), 460–81.
12.
BollenKenneth, and LennoxRichard (1991), “Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspective,”Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305–314.
13.
BonnerJoseph M., and OrvilleC. WalkerJr. (2004), “Selecting Influential Business-to-Business Customers in New Product Development: Relational Embeddedness and Knowledge Heterogeneity Considerations,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(3), 155–69.
14.
BrownShona L., and EisenhardtKathleen M. (1997), “The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.
15.
BuchanNancy R., CrosonRachel T.A., and DawesRobyn M. (2002), “Swift Neighbors and Persistent Strangers: A Cross Cultural Investigation of Trust and Reciprocity in Social Exchange,”American Journal of Sociology, 108(1), 168–206.
16.
BurtRonald S. (1992), Structural Holes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
BuurJacob, and MatthewsBen (2008), “Participatory Innovation,”International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3), 255–73.
18.
BuvikArnt, and JohnGeorge (2000), “When Does Vertical Coordination Improve Industrial Purchasing Relationships?”Journal of Marketing, 64(October), 52–64.
19.
CampbellAlexandra J., and CooperRobert G. (1999), “Do Customer Partnerships Improve New Product Success Rates?”Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5), 507–519.
20.
CarsonStephen J. (2007), “When to Give up Control of Outsourced New Product Development,”Journal of Marketing, 71(January), 49–66.
21.
CavusgilS. Tamer, CalantoneRoger J., and ZhaoY. (2003), “Tacit Knowledge Transfer and Firm Innovation Capability,”Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(1), 6–21.
22.
ChandyRajesh K., and TellisGerard J. (1998), “Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize,”Journal of Marketing Research, 35(November), 474–87.
23.
CohenJacob, CohenPatricia, WestStephen G., and AikenLeona S. (2003), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3d ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
DahlstromRobert, Robert DwyerF., and ChandrashekaranMurali (1995), “Environment, Structure and Performance in Interfirm Exchange,”Journal of Business to Business Marketing, 2(2), 37–58.
25.
DayGeorge S. (1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations,”Journal of Marketing, 58(October), 37–52.
26.
De LucaLuigi, and Atuahene-GimaKwaku (2007), “Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 71(January), 95–113.
27.
De RondMark (2003), Strategic Alliances as Social Facts.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
DeshpandéRohit, and ZaltmanGerald (1982), “Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research Information: A Path Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19(February), 14–31.
29.
De VriesMaarten (2008), “Samen Komen Bedrijven Tot Echt Nieuwe Producten,”Financiëele Dagblad, (October 6), 6.
30.
DiamantopoulosAdamantios, and WinklhoferHeidi M. (2001), “Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38(May), 269–77.
31.
DwyerRobert F., SchurrPaul H., and OhSejo (1987), “Developing Buyer–Seller Relationships,”Journal of Marketing, 51(January), 1–27.
32.
DyerJeffrey H., and NobeokaKentaro (2000), “Creating and Managing a High-Performance Knowledge-Sharing Network: The Toyota Case,”Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345–67.
33.
EchambadiRaj, and HessJames D. (2007), “Mean-Centering Does Not Alleviate Collinearity Problems in Moderated Multiple Regression Models,”Marketing Science, 26(3), 438–45.
34.
FangEric (2008), “Customer Participation and the Trade-Off Between New Product Innovativeness and Speed to Market,”Journal of Marketing, 72(July), 90–104.
35.
FornellClaes, and LarckerDavid F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18(February), 39–50.
36.
FrazierGary L., MaltzElliot, AntiaKersi D., and RindfleischAric (2009), “Distributor Sharing of Strategic Information with Suppliers,”Journal of Marketing, 73(July), 31–43.
37.
FrenzenJonathan, and NakamotoKent (1993), “Structure, Cooperation, and the Flow of Market Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 360–75.
GerbingDavid W., and AndersonJames C. (1988), “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 25(May), 186–92.
40.
GranovetterMark (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,”American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–80.
41.
GranovetterMark (1985), “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,”American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
42.
GraysonKent, and AmblerTim (1999), “The Dark Side of Long-Term Relationships in Marketing Services,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36(February), 132–41.
43.
GraysonKent, JohnsonDevon, and ChenDer-Fa (2008), “Is Firm Trust Essential in a Trusted Environment? How Trust in the Business Context Influences Customers,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45(April), 241–56.
44.
GreeneWilliam H. (2002), Limdep Econometric Modeling Guide: Version 8.0.Plainview, NY: Econometric Software Inc.
45.
GuFlora F., HungKineta, and TseDavid K. (2008), “When Does Guanxi Matter? Issues of Capitalization and Its Dark Sides,”Journal of Marketing, 72(July), 12–28.
46.
HamelGary (1991), “Competition for Competence and Interpartner Learning Within International Strategic Alliances,”Strategic Management Journal, 12(Special Issue), 83–103.
47.
HanJin K., KimNamwoon, and SrivastavaRajendra K. (1998), “Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation the Missing Link?”Journal of Marketing, 62(October), 30–45.
48.
HansenMorten T. (1999), “The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111.
49.
HanvanichSangphet, SivakumarK., and TomasG., HultM. (2006), “The Relationship of Learning and Memory with Organizational Performance: The Moderating Role of Turbulence,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 600–612.
50.
HeideJan B., and WathneKenneth H. (2004), “Relationship Governance in a Supply Chain Network,”Journal of Marketing, 68(January), 73–89.
51.
HeideJan B., WathneKenneth H., and RokkanAksel I. (2007), “Interfirm Monitoring, Social Contracts, and Relationship Outcomes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44(August), 425–33.
52.
HenardDavid H., and SzymanskiDavid M. (2001), “Why Some New Products Are More Successful Than Others,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38(August), 362–75.
53.
HughesJonathan, and WeissJeff (2007), “Simple Rules for Making Alliances Work,”Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 122–31.
54.
InkpenAndrew C. (1996), “Creating Knowledge Through Collaboration,”California Management Review, 39(1), 123–40.
55.
JapSandy D. (1999), “Pie-Expansion Efforts: Collaboration Processes in Buyer–Supplier Relationships,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36(November), 461–75.
56.
JapSandy D. (2003), “An Exploratory Study of the Introduction of Online Reverse Auctions,”Journal of Marketing, 67(July), 96–107.
57.
JapSandy D., and AndersonErin (2003), “Safeguarding Interorganizational Performance and Continuity Under Ex Post Opportunism,”Management Science, 49(12), 1684–1701.
58.
JapSandy D., and AndersonErin (2007), “Testing a Life-Cycle Theory of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships: Movement Across Stages and Performance,”Management Science, 53(2), 260–75.
59.
JaworskiBernard J., and KohliAjay K. (1993), “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences,”Journal of Marketing, 57(July), 53–70.
60.
JohanssonJuliet E., KrishnamurthyChandru, and SchlissbergHenry E., (2003), “Solving the Solutions Problem,”McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 116–25.
61.
JohnGeorge, and MartinJohn (1984), “Effects of Organizational Structure of Marketing Planning on Credibility and Utilization of Plan Output,”Journal of Marketing Research, 21(May), 170–83.
62.
JohnsonJean L., and SohiRavipreet S. (2001), “The Influence of Firm Predispositions on Interfirm Relationship Formation in Business Markets,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18(4), 299–318.
63.
KyriakopoulosKyriakos, and MoormanChristine (2004), “Tradeoffs in Marketing Exploitation and Exploration Strategies: The Overlooked Role of Market Orientation,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 219–40.
64.
LanePeter J., and LubatkinMichael (1998), “Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning,”Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–77.
65.
LevinDaniel Z., and CrossRob (2004), “The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer,”Management Science, 50(11), 1477–90.
66.
LhuilleryStéphanie, and PfisterEtienne (2009), “R&D Cooperation and Failures in Innovation Projects: Empirical Evidence from French CIS Data,”Research Policy, 38(1), 45–57.
67.
LilienGary L., MorrisonPamela D., SearlsKathleen, SonnackMary, and HippelEric von (2002), “Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development,”Management Science, 48(8), 1042–59.
68.
LindellMichael K., and WhitneyDavid J. (2001), “Accounting for Common Method Variance in Cross-Sectional Research Designs,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–21.
69.
MaltzElliot, and KohliAjay K. (1996), “Market Intelligence Dissemination Across Functional Boundaries,”Journal of Marketing Research, 33(February), 47–61.
70.
MohrJakki J., FisherRobert J., and NevinJohn R. (1996), “Collaborative Communication in Interfirm Relationships: Moderating Effects of Integration and Control,”Journal of Marketing, 60(July), 103–115.
71.
MohrJakki J., and SenguptaSanjit (2002), “Managing the Paradox of Inter-Firm Learning: The Role of Governance Mechanisms,”Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(4), 282–301.
72.
MöllerKristian, and HalinenAino (1999), “Business Relationships and Networks: Managerial Challenge of Network Era,”Industrial Marketing Management, 28(5), 413–27.
73.
MoormanChristine (1995), “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 32(August), 318–35.
74.
MoormanChristine, and MinerAnne S. (1997), “The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34(February), 91–106.
75.
MoormanChristine, ZaltmanGerald, and DeshpandéRohit (1992), “Relationships Between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 29(August), 314–28.
76.
MorganRobert M., and HuntShelby D. (1994), “The Commitment– Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 58(July), 20–38.
77.
MorrisonPamela, RobertsJohn, and HippelEric von (2000), “Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market,”Management Science, 46(12), 1513–27.
78.
MullerDominique, JuddCharles M., and YzerbytVincent Y. (2005), “When Moderation Is Mediated and Mediation Is Moderated,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 852–63.
79.
NarverJohn C., SlaterStanley F., and MacLachlanDouglas L. (2004), “Responsive and Proactive Market Orientation and New-Product Success,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 334–47.
80.
MetrologyNikon (2008), company interviews.
81.
PalmatierRobert W. (2008), “Interfirm Relational Drivers of Customer Value,”Journal of Marketing, 72(July), 76–89.
82.
PalmatierRobert W., DantRajiv P., GrewalDhruv, and EvansKenneth R. (2006), “Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing: A Meta-Analysis,”Journal of Marketing, 70(October), 136–53.
83.
PodsakoffPhilip M., and OrganDennis W. (1986), “Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects,”Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–44.
84.
PowellWalter W., KoputKenneth W., and Smith-DoerrLarel (1996), “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–45.
85.
PrahaladC.K., and RamaswamyVenkatraman (2003), “The New Frontier of Experience Innovation,”MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 12–18.
86.
PrahaladC.K., and RamaswamyVenkatraman (2004), “Co-creating Unique Value with Customers,”Strategy & Leadership, 32(3), 4–9.
87.
ReagansRay, and McEvilyBill (2003), “Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–67.
88.
RindfleischAric, and MoormanChristine (2001), “The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances: A Strength-of-Ties Perspective,”Journal of Marketing, 65(April), 1–18.
89.
RingPeter S., and Van de Ven AndrewH. (1994), “Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships,”Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90–118.
90.
RokkanAksel I., HeideJan B., and WathneKenneth H. (2003), “Specific Investments in Marketing Relationships: Expropriation and Bonding Effects,”Journal of Marketing Research, 40(May), 210–24.
91.
RowleyTim, BehrensDean, and KrackhardtDavid (2000), “Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries,”Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 369–86.
92.
RubinDonald B. (1987), Multiple Imputation for Survey Nonresponse.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
93.
SchaferJoseph L. (1999), “Multiple Imputation: A Primer,”Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(1), 3–15.
94.
SchoonhovenClaudia B. (1981), “Problems with Contingency Theory: Testing Assumptions Hidden Within the Language of Contingency ‘Theory,’”Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 349–77.
95.
SelnesFred, and SallisJames (2003), “Promoting Relationship Learning,”Journal of Marketing, 67(July), 80–95.
96.
ShroutPatrick E., and BolgerNiall (2002), “Mediation in Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations,”Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–45.
97.
SivadasEugene, and Robert DwyerF. (2000), “An Examination of Organizational Factors Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes,”Journal of Marketing, 64(January), 31–49.
98.
SlaterStanley F., and NarverJohn C. (1995), “Market Orientation and the Learning Organization,”Journal of Marketing, 59(July), 63–74.
99.
SorensonOlav, and WaguespackDavid M. (2006), “Social Structure and Exchange: Self-Confirming Dynamics in Hollywood,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(4), 560–89.
100.
SorescuAlina B., ChandyRajesh K., and PrabhuJaideep C. (2003), “Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals,”Journal of Marketing, 67(October), 82–102.
101.
StankoMichael A., BonnerJoseph M., and CalantoneRoger J. (2007), “Building Commitment in Buyer–Seller Relationships: A Tie Strength Perspective,”Industrial Marketing Management, 36(8), 1094–1103.
102.
SwaminathanVanitha, and MoormanChristine (2009), “Marketing Alliances, Firm Networks, and Firm Value Creation,”Journal of Marketing, 72(September), 52–69.
103.
ThompsonVictor A. (1965), “Bureaucracy and Innovation,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(1), 1–20.
104.
TuliKapil R., KohliAjay K., and BharadwajSundar G. (2007), “Rethinking Customer Solutions: From Product Bundles to Relational Processes,”Journal of Marketing, 71(July), 1–17.
105.
UrbanGlen L., and HippelEric von (1988), “Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products,”Management Science, 34(5), 569–82.
106.
UzziBrian (1997), “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 37–69.
107.
UzziBrian, and LancasterRyon (2003), “Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients,”Management Science, 49(4), 383–99.
108.
VargoStephen L., and LuschRobert F. (2008), “Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the Evolution,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.
109.
VCST (2003), Company interviews and “Value-Creation and Marketing Strategy: The Case of VCST,” unpublished white paper.
110.
Von HippelEric (1986), “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts,”Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.
111.
Von HippelEric, and KatzRalph (2002), “Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits,”Management Science, 48(7), 821–33.
112.
WathneKenneth H., and HeideJan B. (2000), “Opportunism in Interfirm Relationships: Forms, Outcomes, and Solutions,”Journal of Marketing, 64(October), 36–51.
113.
WilliamsonOliver E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.New York: The Free Press.
114.
WilliamsonOliver E. (1983), “Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange,”The American Economic Review, 73(4), 519–40.
115.
WuytsStefan, StremerschStefan, and DuttaShantanu (2004), “Portfolios of Interfirm Agreements in Technology-Intensive Markets: Consequences for Innovation and Profitability,”Journal of Marketing, 68(April), 88–100.
116.
ZaltmanGerald, DuncanRobert, and HolbekJonny (1973), Innovation and Organizations.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
