The Vulnerabilities of Orphaned Children Participating in Research: A Critical Review and Factors for Consideration for Participation in Biomedical and Behavioral Research
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2012
The Vulnerabilities of Orphaned Children Participating in Research: A Critical Review and Factors for Consideration for Participation in Biomedical and Behavioral Research
Orphans are a subpopulation with a unique set of additional vulnerabilities. Increasing focus on children's rights, pediatric global health, and pediatric research makes it imperative to recognize and address unique vulnerabilities of orphaned children. This paper describes the unique vulnerabilities of the orphaned pediatric population and offers a structured set of factors that require consideration when including orphans in biomedical research. Pediatric orphans are particularly vulnerable due to decreased economic resources, psychosocial instability, increased risk of abuse, and delayed/decreased access to healthcare. These vulnerabilities are significant. By carefully considering each issue in a population in a culturally specific and study-specific manner, researchers can make valuable contributions to the overall health and well-being of this uniquely vulnerable population.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (1995). Guidelines for the ethical conduct of studies to evaluate drugs in pediatric populations (Committee on Drugs, American Academy of Pediatrics). Pediatrics, 95(2), 286–294.
2.
BeauchampJ. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
BhargavaA. (2005). AIDS epidemic and the psychological well-being and school participation of Ethiopian orphans. Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 10(3), 263–275.
4.
BorisN.ThurmanT.SniderL.SpencerE., & BrownL. (2006). Infants and young children living in youth-headed households in Rwanda: Implications of emerging data. Infant Mental Health Journal, 27(6), 584–602.
5.
CaseA.PaxsonC., & AbleidingerJ. (2002). Orphans in Africa: Center for Health and Well-being, Research Program in Development Studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
6.
ChipfakachaV. (2002). Comparison of orphan coping mechanisms in the old (pre- colonial) and new (post-colonial) Shona (Zimbabwe), Ndebele (Zimbabwe, South Africa), Kalanga (Botswana, Zimbabwe), and Tswana (Botswana, South Africa) cultures. Botswana: World Health Organization.
7.
DeiningerK.GarciaM., & SubbaraoK. (2003). AIDS-induced orphans as systemic shock: Magnitude, impact and program interventions in Africa. World Development, 31(7), 1201–1220.
8.
GilbornL.ApicellaL.BrakarshJ.DubeL.JemisonK.KluckowM.SmithT., & SniderL. (2006). Orphans and vulnerable youth in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe: An exploratory study of psychological well-being and psychosocial support programs. New York: Population Council.
KipnisK. (2003). Seven vulnerabilities in the pediatric research subject. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 24(2), 107–120.
11.
LevineC.FadenR.GradyC.HammerschmidtD.EckenwilerL.SugarmanJ.. (2004). The limitations of “vulnerability” as a protection for human research participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 4(3), 44–49.
12.
MuhweziW.MuhangiD., & MugumyaF. (2009). Intra-household differences in health seeking behavior for orphans and non-orphans in an NGO-supported and non-supported sub-county of Luwero, Uganda. African Health Sciences, 9(2), 109–117.
13.
NaanyuV.SidleJ.FrankelR. M.AyukuD.NyandikoW. M., & InuiT. S. (2011). Rooting inquiry in tradition: The health baraza as a tool for social research in Kenya. Qualitative Health Research, 21(1), 14–26.
14.
NtandaH.Olupot-OlupotP.MugyenyiP.KityoC.LowesR.CooperC.. (2009). Orphanhood predicts delayed access to care in Ugandan children. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 28(2), 153–155.
15.
NyambedhaE. (2008). Ethical dilemmas of social science research on AIDS and orphanhood in Western Kenya. Social Science and Medicine, 67(5), 771–779.
16.
NyandikoW.AyayaS., & NabakweE. (2006). Outcomes of HIV-infected orphaned and non-orphaned children on antiretroviral therapy in Western Kenya. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 43(4), 418–425.
17.
PeltonJ. & ForehandR. (2005). Orphans of the AIDS epidemic: An examination of clinical level problems of children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(6), 585–591.
18.
ShivasT. (2004). Contextualizing the vulnerability standard. American Journal of Bioethics, 4(3), 84–86.
19.
SubbaraoK., & CouryD. (2004). Reaching out to Africa's orphans: A framework for public action. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
VreemanR.NyandikoW. A.WalumbeE.MarreroD., & InuiT. S. (2009). Factors sustaining pediatric adherence to antiretroviral therapy in western Kenya. Qualitative Health Research, 19(12), 1716–1729.
25.
VreemanR.WieheS.AyayaS.MusickB., & NyandikoW. (2008). Association of antiretroviral and clinic adherence with orphan status among HIV-infected children in western Kenya. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 49(2), 163–170.
26.
WakhweyaA. (2003). Health strategies to mitigate the impact of orphanhood. Presentation at the OVC Workshop, World Bank, Washington, DC.
27.
YoungL. & AnsellN. (2003). Young AIDS migrants in South Africa: Policy implications for empowering children. AIDS Care, 15(3), 337–345.
