Investing in College Readiness: Societal Benefits and Costs of the El Dorado College Promise Program

Abstract

A growing volume of research shows college promise programs increase the likelihood that students enroll in and complete college. Place-based promise programs provide a guaranteed college scholarship for students who attend a specified school district. We examine the societal benefits and costs of a place-based scholarship program in rural Arkansas, the El Dorado Promise. Our cost framework treats tuition payments as a cash transfer that shifts the cost burden of higher education rather than causing new societal costs. Findings show the program provides societal benefits equal to $4.60 for each dollar invested. A break-even analysis shows the program produces benefits to society that exceed costs within an 81% confidence interval of effects, providing relatively high likelihood of positive returns.

Keywords

benefit–cost analysis higher education finance college promise programs returns to higher education societal benefits and costs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agan

A. Y.

(2013). Disaggregating the returns to college (Unpublished). Princeton University.

American Institutes for Research. (2021). Standards for the economic evaluation of educational and social programs: The CASP standards. https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/Standards-for-the-Economic-Evaluation-of-Educational-and-Social-Programs-CASP-May-2021.pdf

Arkansas Department of Education. (2022). SFFA-BDA funding data 2021–22. https://dese.ade.arkansas.gov/Files/SFFA-BDA_funding_data_2021-22_-_6.30.22_FAS.pdf

Ash

Swanson

Ritter

(2021). A promise kept? The impact of the El Dorado Promise Scholarship on student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(1), 83–107.

Atchison

Zeiser

K. L.

Mohammed

Knight

D. S.

Levin

(2021). The costs and benefits of early college high schools. Education Finance and Policy, 16(4), 659–689.

Baker

B. D.

(2021). School finance and education equity: Lessons from Kansas. Harvard Education Press.

Baker

B. D.

Green

P. C.

(2012). Conceptions of equity and adequacy in school finance. In H. F. Ladd & M. E. Goertz (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 225–243). Routledge.

Bartik

T. J.

Hershbein

Lachowska

(2016). The merits of universal scholarships: Benefit-cost evidence from the Kalamazoo Promise. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 7(3), 400–433.

Bartik

T. J.

Hershbein

Lachowska

(2021). The effects of the Kalamazoo Promise scholarship on college enrollment and completion. Journal of Human Resources, 56(1), 269–310.

10.

Bartik

T. J.

Miller-Adams

Pittelko

Timmeney

B. F.

(2021). Economic costs and benefits of tuition-free college in Illinois. Employment Research Newsletter, 28(4), 4–7.

11.

Bell

(2021). Does free community college improve student outcomes? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(2), 329–350.

12.

Belfield

Bowden

A. B.

(2019). Using resource and cost considerations to support educational evaluation: Six domains. Educational Researcher, 48(2), 120–127.

13.

Bifulco

Rubenstein

Sohn

(2019). Evaluating the effects of universal place-based scholarships on student outcomes: the Buffalo “Say Yes to Education” Program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 38(4), 918–943.

14.

Billings

M. S.

A. Y.

Gándara

Acevedo

Cervantes

Turcios-Villalta

(2023). Financing promise programs: Where the money comes from and where the money goes. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2023(203), 9–23.

15.

Boardman

Greenberg

Vining

Weimer

(2011). Cost-benefit analysis: Concepts and practice (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.

16.

Bowden

A. B.

Shand

Levin

H. M.

Muroga

Wang

(2020). An economic evaluation of the costs and benefits of providing comprehensive supports to students in elementary school. Prevention Science, 21, 1126–1135.

17.

Bueno

Page

L. C.

Smith

(2022). Assessing Atlanta’s placed-based college scholarship (EdWorkingPaper: 22-670). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/mtk2-v091

18.

Camp

Zamarro

McGee

(2024). Looking back and moving forward: COVID-19’s impact on the teacher labor market and implications for the future. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737241258184

19.

Carroll

S. J.

Erkut

(2009). The benefits to taxpayers from increases in students’ educational attainment. Rand Corporation.

20.

Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education. (2024). CostOut tool. University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education. https://www.cbcse.org/costout

21.

Cohodes

S. R.

Goodman

J. S.

(2014). Merit aid, college quality, and college completion: Massachusetts’ Adams scholarship as an in-kind subsidy. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(4), 251–285.

22.

Cornman

S. Q.

Nixon

L. C.

Spence

M. J.

Taylor

L. L.

Geverdt

D. E.

(2019). Education demographic and geographic estimates (EDGE) program: American community survey comparable wage index for teachers (ACS-CWIFT) (NCES 2018-130). National Center for Education Statistics.

23.

Delaney

J. A.

Hemenway

(2020). A difference-in-difference analysis of “promise” financial aid programs on postsecondary institutions. Journal of Education Finance, 45(4), 459–492.

24.

DesJardins

(2002). Understanding and using efficiency and equity criteria in the study of higher education policy. In Smart

J. C.

Tierney

W. G.

(Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 173–219). Springer.

25.

Dowd

A. C.

Shieh

L. T.

(2013). Community college financing: Equity, efficiency, and accountability. In The NEA 2013 Almanac of higher education (pp. 37–65). National Education Association. http://ftp.arizonaea.org/assets/docs/2013_Almanac_Dowd.pdf

26.

Doyle

W. R.

Skinner

B. T.

(2016). Estimating the education-earnings equation using geographic variation. Economics of Education Review, 53, 254–267.

27.

Duncheon

J. C.

(2015). The problem of college readiness. In Tierney

W. G.

Duncheon

J. C.

(Eds.), The problem of college readiness (pp. 3–44). State University of New York Press.

28.

Duncheon

J. C.

(2021). Making sense of college readiness in a low-performing urban high school: Perspectives of high-achieving first generation youth. Urban Education, 56(8), 1360–1387.

29.

Dynarski

(2008). Building the stock of college-educated labor. Journal of Human Resources, 43(3), 576–610.

30.

Dynarski

Page

Scott-Clayton

(2023). College costs, financial aid, and student decisions. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 7, pp. 227–285). Elsevier.

31.

Green

P. C.

III Baker

B. D.

Oluwole

J. O.

(2020). School finance, race, and reparations. Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice, 27(2), 483–558.

32.

Hernandez

Saunders

(n.d.). Discovering dollars: Understanding Arkansas school finance. https://core-docs.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/documents/asset/uploaded_file/2048/ASBA/3780327/Discovering_Dollars_Understanding_Arkansas_School_Finance_-_Mike_Hernandez___Eric_Sanders.pdf

33.

Hershbein

Kearney

(2014). Major decisions: Graduates’ earnings growth and debt repayment. The Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution.

34.

Hoxby

C. M.

Avery

(2012). The missing” one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low income students (No. w18586). National Bureau of Economic Research.

35.

Kaput

McMillan

O’Keefe

(2025). Setting a benchmark: An analysis of Arkansas’ K-12 education finance system. Bellwether Partners. https://bellwether.org/publications/setting-a-benchmark/

36.

Kelly

M. G.

Farrie

(2023). Misrepresented funding gaps in data for some states. Educational Researcher, 52(4), 244–247.

37.

Kim

Tamborini

C. R.

Sakamoto

(2015). Field of study in college and lifetime earnings in the United States. Sociology of Education, 88(4), 320–339.

38.

Knight

D. S.

(2017). Are high-poverty school districts disproportionately impacted by state funding cuts? School finance equity following the Great Recession. Journal of Education Finance, 43(2), 169–194.

39.

Knight

D. S.

Almasi

Shin

Duncheon

J. C.

(2025). Teacher retention in early college high schools and STEM Academies: Understanding the positive impacts of college and career readiness school models. Education Economics, 34(1), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2025.2463639

40.

Knight

D. S.

Almasi

Urness-Straight

Loeb

(2024). Funding the digital divide? How school district financing for educational technology changed during the COVID-19 pandemic (EdWorkingPaper 24-998). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/2xc6-gm93

41.

Knight

D. S.

Landry

S. H.

Zucker

T. A.

Merz

E. C.

Guttentag

C. L.

Taylor

H. B.

(2019). Cost-effectiveness of early childhood interventions to enhance preschool: Evidence from a randomized experiment in Head Start centers enrolling historically underserved populations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 38(4), 891–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22145

42.

Knight

D. S.

Sun

Almasi

Candelaria

C. A.

Shin

DeMatthews

(2025). Educator retention in context: Understanding patterns in principal turnover in Texas and Washington State during the COVID-19 era. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/01623737251367056

43.

Levin

H. M.

Belfield

(2015). Guiding the development and use of cost-effectiveness analysis in education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(3), 400–418.

44.

Levin

H. M.

McEwan

P. J.

(2001). Cost-effectiveness analysis: Methods and applications. Sage.

45.

Levin

H. M.

McEwan

P. J.

Belfield

Bowden

A. B.

Shand

(2018). Economic evaluation in education: Cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost analysis. Sage.

46.

McMahon

W. W.

(2009). Higher learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. JHU Press.

47.

McMahon

W. W.

Delaney

J. A.

(2021). The external social benefits of higher education: Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Education Finance, 46(4), 387–397.

48.

Miller-Adams

(2015). Promise nation: Transforming communities through place-based scholarships. WE Upjohn Institute.

49.

Miller-Adams

(2021). The path to free college: In pursuit of access, equity, and prosperity. Harvard Education Press.

50.

Morgan

(2022). Equal is not good enough: An analysis of school funding equity across the US and within each state. Education Trust.

51.

Núñez

A. M.

(2014). Employing multilevel intersectionality in educational research: Latino identities, contexts, and college access. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 85–92.

52.

Page

L. C.

Iriti

J. E.

Lowry

D. J.

Anthony

A. M.

(2019). The promise of place-based investment in postsecondary access and success: Investigating the impact of the Pittsburgh Promise. Education Finance and Policy, 14(4), 572–600.

53.

Perna

L. W.

Finney

J. E.

(2014). The attainment agenda: State policy leadership in higher education. JHU Press.

54.

Perna

L. W.

Leigh

E. W.

(2018). Understanding the promise: A typology of state and local college promise programs. Educational Researcher, 47(3), 155–180.

55.

Perna

L. W.

Smith

E. J.

(2020). How our findings bear on future policy, practice, and research. In Perna

L. W.

Smith

E. D.

(Eds.), Improving research-based knowledge of college promise programs (pp. 305–324). American Education Research Association.

56.

Perna

L. W.

Wright-Kim

Leigh

E. W.

(2020). Is a college promise program an effective use of resources? Understanding the implications of program design and resource investments for equity and efficiency. AERA Open, 6(4), 2332858420967633.

57.

Perna

L. W.

Wright-Kim

Leigh

E. W.

(2021). Will college promise programs improve or reduce equity? Understanding the contextual conditions that influence program implementation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29(26).

58.

Ritter

G. W.

Ash

(2016). The promise of a college scholarship transforms a district. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(5), 13–19.

59.

Rossi

P. H.

Lipsey

M. W.

Henry

G. T.

(2019). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Sage.

60.

Ruiz

Leigh

E.W.

Napier

Gonza ́lez Canche

M.S.

2020. Community college promise programs and local impact: Aggregate effects of college attainment in three promise com- munities. In Perna

L. W.

Smith

E. J.

(Eds.), Improving research-based knowledge of college promise programs (pp. 241–266). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvxw3phv.14

61.

Scott-Clayton

J. E.

(2011). On money and motivation: A quasi-experimental analysis of financial incentives for college achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 46(3), 614–646.

62.

Shand

Bowden

A. B.

Davis

(2021). Has Godot arrived? An update on the state of economic evaluation in education research. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.

63.

Shores

Candelaria

(2020). Get real! Inflation adjustments of educational finance data. Educational Researcher, 49(1), 71–74.

64.

Swanson

Ritter

(2020). Start to finish: Examining the impact of the El Dorado Promise program on postsecondary outcomes. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 49(3), 1–29.

65.

Tamborini

C. R.

Kim

Sakamoto

(2015). Education and lifetime earnings in the United States. Demography, 52(4), 1383–1407.

66.

Trostel

P. A.

(2010). The fiscal impacts of college attainment. Research in Higher Education, 51(3), 220–247.

67.

Walker

Griffin

Asaria

Tsuchiya

Sculpher

(2019). Striving for a societal perspective: A framework for economic evaluations when costs and effects fall on multiple sectors and decision makers. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 17, 577–590.

68.

Zimmerman

S. D.

(2014). The returns to college admission for academically marginal students. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(4), 711–754.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.50 MB