Complex uncertain variables are measurable functions from an uncertainty space to the set of complex numbers and are used to model complex uncertain quantities. This paper introduces the convergence concepts of complex uncertain sequences: convergence almost surely (a.s.), convergence in measure, convergence in mean, convergence in distribution and convergence uniformly almost surely. In addition, relationships among them are discussed.
Sequence convergence, as a fundamental theory of mathematics, plays a very important role in probability theory. There are many convergence concepts of random sequences such as convergence in probability, convergence in mean, convergence almost surely, convergence in distribution and so on. Based on these concepts of convergence, “limits theorem” for random sequences were derived, which had been an important issue in probability theory. A notion called “statistical convergence” in sequences of real or complex terms has similarity with convergence in the notion of probability theory. In this case the distribution of the terms of the sequences is taken into account. The density of subscripts relative to the set of natural numbers has been considered. It is found in the works published by Rath and Tripathy [17], Tripathy and Sen [18], Tripathy et al. [19].
However, in our daily life, we often encounter the case that there are lack of or no observed data about the events, not only for economic reasons or technical difficulties, but also for influence of unexpected events. Due to not enough data to get probability distribution of events, we have to consult with some domain experts to give belief degree that each event would happen while making decisions. Kahneman and Tversky [4] showed that human beings usually overweight unlikely events. From another side, Liu [14] showed that human beings usually estimate a much wider range of values than the object actually takes. Thus the belief degree may have much larger variance than the real frequency. In this case, if we insist on dealing with the belief degree by using probability theory, counterintuitive results may occur. Interested readers may refer to Liu [12] for an example.
In order to deal with belief degree, an uncertainty theory was founded by Liu [5] in 2007, and refined by Liu [10] in 2010 which based on an uncertain measure which satisfies normality, duality, subadditivity, and product axioms. Thereafter, a concept of uncertain variable was proposed to represent the uncertain quantity and a concept of uncertainty distribution to describe uncertain variables. Up to now, uncertainty theory has successfully been applied to uncertain programming (Liu [7], Liu and Chen [15]), uncertain risk analysis and uncertain reliability analysis (Liu [9]), uncertain logic (Liu [11]), uncertain differential equation (Liu [6], Yao and Chen [20]), uncertain graphs (Gao and Gao [2], Zhang and Peng [22]), uncertain calculus (Liu [8]) and uncertain finance (Chen [1], Liu [8], Liu [13]), etc.
In real life, uncertainty not only appears in real quantities but also in complex quantities. In order to model complex uncertain quantities, Peng [16] presented the concepts of complex uncertain variable and complex uncertainty distribution, and also the expected value was proposed to measure a complex uncertain variable in 2012.
Since sequence convergence plays an important role in the fundamental theory of mathematics, there are also many convergence concepts in uncertainty theory. In 2007, Liu [5] first introduced convergence in measure, convergence in mean, convergence almost surely (a.s.) and convergence in distribution and their relationships were also discussed. You [21] introduced another type of convergence named convergence uniformly almost surely and showed the relationships among those convergence concepts. Zhang [23] proved some theorems on the convergence of uncertain sequence. After that, Guo and Xu [3] gave the concept of convergence in mean square for uncertain sequence and showed that an uncertain sequence converged in mean square if and only if it was a Cauchy sequence. Inspired by these, we study the convergence concepts of complex uncertain sequence and discuss the relationships among them in this paper.
Preliminaries
In this section, some foundational concepts and theorems in uncertainty theory are introduced, which are used throughout this paper.
Definition 2.1. Liu [5] Let ℒ be a σ-algebra on a nonempty set Γ. A set function ℳ is called an uncertain measure if it satisfies the following axioms: Axiom 1. (Normality Axiom) ℳ {Γ} =1; Axiom 2. (Duality Axiom) ℳ {Λ} + ℳ {Λc} =1 for any Λ ∈ ℒ; Axiom 3. (Subadditivity Axiom) For every countable sequence of {Λj} ∈ ℒ, we have
The triplet (Γ, ℒ, ℳ) is called an uncertainty space, and each element Λ in ℒ is called an event. In order to obtain an uncertain measure of compound event, a product uncertain measure is defined by Liu [8] as follows:
Axiom 4. (Product Axiom) Let (Γk, ℒk, ℳk) be uncertainty spaces for k = 1, 2, ⋯. The product uncertain measure ℳ is an uncertain measure satisfying
where Λk are arbitrarily chosen events from ℒk for k = 1, 2, ⋯, respectively.
Definition 2.2. Liu [5] An uncertain variableξ is a measurable function from an uncertainty space (Γ, ℒ, ℳ) to the set of real numbers, i.e., for any Borel set B of real numbers, the set
is an event.
Definition 2.3. Liu [5] The uncertainty distributionΦ of an uncertain variable ξ is defined by
An uncertain variable ξ is said to be normal if it has a normal uncertainty distribution
denoted by ξ ∼ 𝒩 (e, σ) where e and σ are real numbers with σ > 0.
Definition 2.4. Liu [8] The uncertain variables ξ1, ξ2, ⋯ , ξn are said to be independent if
for any Borel sets B1, B2, ⋯ , Bn of real numbers.
Definition 2.5. Liu [5] Let ξ be an uncertain variable. The expected value of ξ is defined by
provided that at least one of the above two integrals is finite.
Considering the importance role of sequence convergence in mathematics, some concepts of convergence for uncertain sequences were introduced in [5,21, 5,21] as follows:
Definition 2.6. Liu [5] The uncertain sequence {ξn} is said to be convergent almost surely (a.s.) to ξ if there exists an event Λ with ℳ {Λ} =1 such that
for every γ ∈ Λ. In that case we write ξn → ξ, a . s .
Definition 2.7. Liu [5] The uncertain sequence {ξn} is said to be convergent in measure toξif
for every ɛ > 0.
Definition 2.8. Liu [5] The uncertain sequence {ξn} is said to be convergent in mean toξ if
Definition 2.9. Liu [5] Let Φ, Φ1, Φ2, ⋯ be the uncertainty distributions of uncertain variables ξ, ξ1, ξ2, ⋯, respectively. We say the uncertain sequence {ξn} converges in distribution to ξif
for all x at which Φ (x) is continuous.
Definition 2.10. You [21] The sequence {ξn} is said to be convergent uniformly almost surely toξ if there exists {Ek}, ℳ {Ek} →0 such that {ξn} converges uniformly to ξ in Γ - Ek, for any fixed k ∈ N.
Complex uncertain variable
In this section, we introduce some concepts and theorems of complex uncertain variable which were first proposed by Peng [16] in 2012.
As a complex function on uncertainty space, complex uncertain variable is mainly used to model a complex uncertain quantity.
Definition 3.1. Peng [16] A complex uncertain variable is a measurable function ζ from an uncertainty space (Γ, ℒ, ℳ) to the set of complex numbers, i.e., for any Borel set B of complex numbers, the set
is an event.
Theorem 3.1.Peng [16] A variable ζ from an uncertainty space (Γ, ℒ, ℳ) to the set of complex numbers is a complex uncertain variable if and only if Reζ and Imζ are uncertain variables where Reζ and Imζ represent the real and the imaginary part of ζ, respectively.
Definition 3.2. Peng [16] Let ξ and η be independent normal uncertain variables. Then ζ = ξ + iη is called complex normal uncertain variable.
Definition 3.3. Peng [16] The complex uncertainty distributionΦ (x) of a complex uncertain variable ζ is a function from to [0, 1] defined by
for any complex c.
Theorem 3.2.Peng [16] A function Φ (c) → [0, 1] is a complex uncertainty distribution if and only if it is increasing with respect to the real part Re (c) and the imaginary part Im (c) such that
for any ;
where is the imaginary unit.
Convergence concepts of complex uncertain sequence
Complex uncertain sequence is a sequence of complex uncertain variables indexed by integers. In this section, we introduce five convergence concepts of complex uncertain sequence: convergence almost surely (a.s.), convergence in measure, convergence in mean, convergence in distribution and convergence uniformly almost surely.
Definition 4.1. The complex uncertain sequence {ζn} is said to be convergent almost surely (a.s.) toζ if there exists an event Λ with ℳ {Λ} =1 such that
for every γ ∈ Λ.
Definition 4.2. The complex uncertain sequence {ζn} is said to be convergent in measure toζ if
for every ɛ > 0.
Definition 4.3. Let ζ, ζ1, ζ2, ⋯ be complex uncertain variables with finite expected values. Then the complex uncertain sequence {ζn} is said to be convergent in mean toζ if
Definition 4.4. Let Φ, Φ1, Φ2, ⋯ be the complex uncertainty distributions of complex uncertain variables ζ, ζ1, ζ2, ⋯, respectively. We say the complex uncertain sequence {ζn} converges in distribution toζ if
for all c at which Φ (c) is continuous.
Definition 4.5. The sequence {ζn} is said to be convergent uniformly almost surely toζ if there exists , such that {ζn} converges uniformly to ζ in , for any fixed k ∈ N.
Relationships among convergence concepts
In this section, relationships among the five convergence concepts of complex uncertain sequences are studied.
Convergence in mean and convergence in measure
Theorem 5.1.If the complex uncertain sequence {ζn} converges in mean to ζ, then {ζn} converges in measure to ζ.
Proof: It follows from the Markov inequality that for any given number ɛ > 0, we have
as n→ ∞. Thus {ζn} converges in measure to ζ and the theorem is thus proved. □
Remark 5.1. Assuming ζn = ξn + iηn for n = 1, 2, ⋯ and ζ = ξ + iη, we have
is just an uncertain variable.
Example 5.1. Take an uncertainty space (Γ, ℒ, ℳ) to be {γ1, γ2} with . We define complex uncertain variables by
for n = 1, 2, ⋯. We also define ζ by
Then for any given number ɛ > 0 we have
as n→ ∞ which implies {ζn} converges in mean to ζ. It follows from Theorem 5.1 that {ζn} converges in measure. In fact, we can easily obtain
as n→ ∞ which implies {ζn} converges in measure to ζ .
Example 5.2. Convergence in measure does not imply convergence in mean. Take an uncertainty space (Γ, ℒ, ℳ) to be {γ1, γ2, ⋯} with
And the complex uncertain variables are defined by
for n = 1, 2, ⋯ and ζ ≡ 0. For some small number ɛ > 0 and n ≥ 2, we have
as n→ ∞. So the sequence {ζn} converges in measure to ζ. However, for each n ≥ 2, we have the uncertainty distribution of uncertain variable ∥ζn - ζ∥ = ∥ ζn ∥ is
So for each n ≥ 2, we have
That is, the sequence {ζn} does not converge in mean to ζ.
Convergence in measure and convergence in distribution
Theorem 5.2.Assume complex uncertain sequence {ζn} with real part {ξn} and imaginary part {ηn}, respectively, for n = 1, 2, ⋯. If uncertain sequences {ξn} and {ηn} converge in measure to ξ and η, respectively, then complex uncertain sequence {ζn} converges in measure to ζ = ξ + iη.
Proof: It follows from the definition of convergence in measure of uncertain sequence that for any small number ɛ > 0,
and
Note that
Thus we have
Using subadditivity axiom of uncertain measure, we obtain
Hence, we have
So . That is, {ζn} converges in measure to ζ. □
In Example 5.1, assume
and
By the expressions of ζn, ξn and ηn we have
Then for any given number ɛ > 0 we have
as n→ ∞ and
for n = 1, 2, ⋯. Hence, {ξn} and {ηn} converge in measure to ξ and η, respectively. By Theorem 5.2, we also obtain {ζn} converges to ζ = ξ + iη in measure.
Theorem 5.3.Assume complex uncertain sequence {ζn} with real part {ξn} and imaginary part {ηn}, respectively, for n = 1, 2, ⋯. If uncertain sequences {ξn} and {ηn} converge in measure to ξ and η, respectively, then complex uncertain sequence {ζn} converges in distribution to ζ = ξ + iη.
Proof: Let c = a + ib be a given continuity point of the complex uncertainty distribution Φ. On the one hand, for any α > a, β > b, we have
It follows from the subadditivity axiom that
Since {ξn} and {ηn} converge in measure to ξ and η, respectively, we have
and
Thus we obtain for any α > a, β > b. Letting α + iβ → a + ib, we get
On the other hand, for any x < a, y < b, we have
which implies
Since
and
we obtain
for any x < a, y < b. On x + iy → a + ib, we get
It follows from (1) and (2) that Φn (c) → Φ (c) as n→ ∞. That is, complex uncertain sequence {ζn} converges in distribution to ζ = ξ + iη. The theorem is verified. □
Example 5.3. Consider complex normal uncertain variables ζn = ξn + iηn where and for n = 1, 2, ⋯, respectively. Assume ζ = ξ + iη where ξ = 𝒩 (0, 1) and η = 𝒩 (0, 2), respectively. In the following, we will show that {ξn} and {ηn} converge in measure to ξ and η, respectively, and {ζn} converges in distributionto ζ.
Since
as n→ ∞, {ξn} and {ηn} converge in mean to ξ and η, respectively. It follows from Theorem 5.1 that {ξn} and {ηn} converge in measure to ξ and η, respectively. And thus by Theorem 5.3 {ζn} converges in distribution to ζ.
In fact, the complex uncertainty distribution of ζ is
Similarly, we have
for n = 1, 2, ⋯ . On n→ ∞, we have Φn (c) → Φ (c) which implies {ζn} converges in distributionto ζ.
Example 5.4. Convergence in distribution does not imply convergence in measure. Take an uncertainty space (Γ, ℒ, ℳ) to be {γ1, γ2} with . We define a complex uncertain variable as
We also define ζn = - ζ for n = 1, 2, ⋯. Then ζn and ζ have the same distribution
Then {ζn} converges in distribution to ζ. However, for some small number ɛ > 0, we have
That is, the sequence {ζn} does not converge in measure to ζ. By Theorem 5.2, the real part and imaginary part of {ζn} also do not converge in measure.
In addition, since ζn = - ζ for n = 1, 2, ⋯, the sequence {ζn} does not converge a.s. to ζ.
Convergence almost surely and convergence in measure
Example 5.5. Convergence a.s. does not imply convergence in measure. Take an uncertainty space (Γ, ℒ, ℳ) to be {γ1, γ2, ⋯} with
Then we define complex uncertain variables by
for n = 1, 2, ⋯ and ζ ≡ 0. Then the sequence {ζn} converges a.s. to ζ. However, for some small number ɛ > 0, we have
as n→ ∞. That is, the sequence {ζn} does not converge in measure to ζ.
In addition, the complex uncertainty distributions of ζn are
for n = 1, 2, ⋯, respectively. And the complex uncertainty distribution of ζ is
Clearly Φn (c) does not converge to Φ (c) at a ≥ 0, b ≥ 0. That is, the sequence {ζn} does not converge to ζ in distribution.
Example 5.6. Convergence in measure does not imply convergence a.s. Take an uncertainty space (Γ, ℒ, ℳ) to be [0,1] with Borel algebra and Lebesgue measure. For any positive integer n, there is an integer m such that n = 2m + k where k is an integer between 0 and 2m - 1. Then we define a complex uncertain variable by
for n = 1, 2, ⋯ and ζ ≡ 0. For some small number ɛ > 0, we obtain
as n→ ∞. So the sequence {ζn} converges in measure to ζ. In addition, we have
as n→ ∞. Thus the sequence {ζn} also converges in mean to ζ.
However, for any γ ∈ [0, 1], there is an infinite number of intervals of the form containing γ. Thus ζn (γ) does not converge to 0. In other words, the sequence {ζn} does not converge a.s. to ζ.
Convergence almost surely and convergence in mean
Example 5.7. Convergence a.s. does not imply convergence in mean. Take an uncertainty space (Γ, ℒ, ℳ) to be {γ1, γ2 ⋯} with
The complex uncertain variables are defined by
for n = 1, 2, ⋯ and ζ ≡ 0. Then {ζn} converges a.s. to ζ. However, the uncertainty distributions of ∥ζn∥ are
for n = 1, 2, ⋯, respectively. Then we have
So the sequence {ζn} does not converge in meanto ζ.
By Example 5.6, we can obtain that convergence in mean does not imply convergence a.s.
Convergence almost surely and convergence uniformly almost surely
Proposition 5.1.Let ζ, ζ1, ζ2, ⋯ be complex uncertain variables. Then {ζn} converges a.s. to ζ if and only if for any ɛ > 0, we have
Proof: By the definition of convergence a.s., we have that there exists an event Λ with ℳ {Λ} =1 such that . Then for any ɛ > 0, there exists k such that ∥ζn - ζ ∥ < ɛ where n > k and for any γ ∈ Λ, that is equivalent to
It follows from the duality axiom of uncertain measure that
The proposition is thus proved. □
Proposition 5.2.Let ζ, ζ1, ζ2, ⋯ be complex uncertain variables. Then {ζn} converges uniformly almost surely to ζ if and only if
Proof: If {ζn} converges uniformly almost surely to ζ, then for any δ > 0, there exists B such that ℳ {B} < δ and {ζn} uniformly converges to ζ on Γ - B. Thus, for any ɛ > 0, there exists k > 0 such that ∥ζn - ζ ∥ < ɛ where n ≥ k and γ ∈ Γ - B. That is
It follows from the subadditivity axiom of uncertain measure that
Then
On the contrary, if
for any ɛ > 0, then for any given δ > 0 and m ≥ 1, there exists mk such that
Let . Then
Furthermore, we have
for any m = 1, 2, ⋯ and n > mk. The proposition is proved. □
Theorem 5.4.If the complex uncertain sequence {ζn} converges uniformly almost surely to ζ, then {ζn} converges almost surely to ζ.
Proof: It follows from Proposition 5.2 that if {ζn} converges uniformly almost surely to ζ, then
Since
taking the limit as n→ ∞ on both side of above inequality, we obtain
By Proposition 5.1, {ζn} converges a.s. to ζ. The theorem is verified. □
As is seen from Example 5.1, since
the sequence {ζn} converges uniformly almost surely to ζ, and thus {ζn} converges a.s. to ζ by Theorem 5.4. □
Convergence uniformly almost surely and convergence in measure
Theorem 5.5.If the complex uncertain sequence {ζn} converges uniformly almost surely to ζ, then {ζn} converges in measure to ζ.
Proof: If {ζn} converges uniformly almost surely to ζ, then from Proposition 5.2 we have
And
Letting n→ ∞, we can obtain {ζn} converges in measure to ζ. □
As is seen from Example 5.6, {ζn} converges in measure to ζ. However, it does not converges a.s. to ζ. It follows from Theorem 5.5 that {ζn} does not converges uniformly almost surely to ζ.
In conclusion, the relationships among the five convergence concepts are displayed in Table 1.
Conclusion
In this paper, some convergence concepts of complex uncertain sequences have been introduced. The relationships among convergence in measure, convergence in mean, convergence almost surely, convergence in distribution and convergence uniformly almost surely are studied.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2014GL002).
References
1.
ChenX., American option pricing formula for uncertain financial market, International Journal of Operations Research8(2) (2011), 32–37.
2.
GaoX. and GaoY., Connectedness index of uncertain graphs, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness & Knowledge-Based Systems21(1) (2013), 127–137.
3.
GuoH. and XuC., A necessary and sufficient condition of convergence in mean square for uncertain sequence,), Information: An International Interdisciplinary Journal16(2(A) (2013), 1091–1096.
4.
KahnemanD. and TverskyA., Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica47(2) (1979), 263–292.
LiuB. and ChenX., Uncertain multiobjective programming and uncertain goal programming, Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications3 (2015), Article 10.
RathD. and TripathyB.C., Matrix maps on sequence spaces associated with sets of integers, Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics27(2) (1996), 197–206.
18.
TripathyB.C. and SenM., Characterization of some matrix classes involving paranormed sequence spaces, Tamkang Journal of Mathematics37(2) (2006), 155–162.
19.
TripathyB.C., BaruahA., EtM. and GungorM., On almost statistical convergence of new type of generalized difference sequence of fuzzy numbers, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transacations A: Science36(2) (2012), 147–155.
20.
YaoK. and ChenX., A numberical method for solving uncertain differential equations, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems25(3) (2013), 825–832.
21.
YouC., On the convergence of uncertain sequences, Mathematical and Computer Modelling49 (2009), 482–487.
22.
ZhangB. and PengJ., Euler index in uncertain graph, Applied Mathematics and Computation218(20) (2012), 10279–10288.
23.
ZhangZ., Some discussions on uncertain measure, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making10(1) (2011), 31–43.