The problem of state feedback control for a class of continuous-time switched nonlinear systems is investigated in this paper. By using the Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy model to represent each subsystem of the switched nonlinear systems, the switched nonlinear systems are modeled into the switched T-S fuzzy systems. Different from existing studies in the literature, by proposing a novel performance index which can be viewed as extended dissipativity, the weighted H∞, L2 - L∞, passive and dissipative control problems for continuous-time switched nonlinear systems are studied in a unified framework. Some weighted matrices are included in the new performance index. Through adjusting the values of these weighted matrices, the new performance index will reduce to the weighted H∞, L2 - L∞, passive and dissipative performance index for the switched systems. By using the multiple Lyapunov functions (MLFs) approach and the average dwell time (ADT) technique, the state feedback controllers are designed to ensure the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system to be asymptotically stable and satisfy the novel performance index. Finally, a numerical example is provided to illustrate the applicability of the obtained results.
During the past decades, the switched systems attracted more and more attention because of many physical or man-made systems possessing switching features [1]. A typical switched system is composed of a finite number of continuous-time or discrete-time subsystems and a switching signal which orchestrates the switching between these subsystems. Recently, the stability and stabilization problems of switched systems have been extensively studied [1–8]. Until now, two stability issues have been addressed, i.e., the stability under arbitrary switching and the stability under constrained switching. For the stability under arbitrary switching, the existence of a common Lyapunov function (CLF) for all subsystems provides a stability condition for the switched systems [1]. As for the stability under constrained switching, the multiple Lyapunov functions have been proven to be an useful method to study the stability of switched systems [2]. As one typical example of constrained switching, the average dwell time (ADT) logic is proposed in [4]. The ADT method is widely used to study the stability problem of switched systems [9–13]. The ADT switching can cover the dwell time switching [1], and the extreme case of the ADT switching is the arbitrary switching [10]. Therefore, it is important and theoretically significant for us to study the switched systems with ADT.
As we know, the T-S fuzzy model is proven to be an effective tool in approximating most complex nonlinear systems [14], which utilizes local linear system description for each rule. The last several decades have witnessed more and more applications of the T-S fuzzy model in the analysis and synthesis of dynamical systems [15–26]. Recently the T-S fuzzy model has been extended to describe each nonlinear subsystem of switched nonlinear systems. Many significant results have been obtained for switched T-S fuzzy systems [27–29].
Recently, based on different performance indexes, the control and filtering issues for continuous-time switched systems have been widely studied. To name a few, the weighted H∞ control problem for switched linear systems has been studied in [9, 13]. The passivity-based control problem for switched systems was solved in [30, 31]. The dissipative control problem of switched systems has been investigated in [32–34]. It has been pointed out that by setting Q ≤ 0, the (Q, S, R)-dissipativity index can include the H∞, positive realness and passivity as special cases [33, 34]. As we know, for the switched systems, the L2 - L∞ performance is another important performance index and has also received considerable attention [35, 36]. Unfortunately, the L2 - L∞ performance index cannot be included in the (Q, S, R)-dissipativity index. Naturally, an interesting and challenging problem arises: Can the dissipative and L2 - L∞ control problems of switched systems be solved in a unified framework? which motivates our study in this paper. This problem is well addressed in this paper.
The main contributions of our work are listed as follows: (I) A novel performance index, including the weighted H∞, L2 - L∞, passivity and dissipativity performance indices as special cases, is proposed in this paper. (II) Based on this new performance index, a novel state feedback controller is designed for the continuous-time switched T-S fuzzy systems.
This paper studies the state feedback control problem for the continuous-time switched T-S fuzzy systems based on a novel performance index. First, the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy systems with state feedback controllers are constructed. Then, a novel performance index which can be viewed as the extended dissipativity performance is proposed. Second, based on the multiple Lyapunov functions approach and the average dwell time technique, the state feedback controllers are designed. Finally, a numerical example is provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the obtained results. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Preliminaries are presented in Section 2. The main results of this paper are presented in Section 3. In Section 4, a numerical examples is provided. Finally, conclusions are shown in Section 5.
Notations: The notations used in this paper are fairly standard. The symbol “*” in a matrix stands for the transposed elements in the symmetric positions. The superscript “T” is the matrix transposition. N denotes the set of the natural numbers. Rn denotes the n-dimensional Euclidean space. I represents the identity matrix in the block matrix with appropriate dimensions. The notation ∥ · ∥ refers to the Euclidean vector norm. L2 [0, ∞) is the space of square-integrable. For v (t) ∈ L2 [0, ∞), its norm is given by . A continuous function α: [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) is said to be of class if it is strictly increasing and α (0) =0. If α is also unbounded, then it is said to be of class . A function β : [0, ∞) × [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) is said to be of class if β (· , t) is of class for each fixed t ≥ 0 and β (s, t) decreases to 0 as t→ ∞ for each fixed s ≥ 0. We use P > 0 (≥0, < 0, ≤ 0) to denote a positive definite (semi-positive definite, negative definite, semi-negative definite) matrix P. If not explicitly stated, matrices are assumed to have compatible dimensions.
Preliminaries
In this paper, let us consider the following switched nonlinear systems:
where x (t) ∈ Rnx is the state vector, z (t) ∈ Rnz is the control output, and w (t) ∈ Rnw is the disturbance input that belongs to L2 [0, ∞). A piecewise constant function of time is called the switching signal, where M ∈ N is the number of subsystems. For a switching sequence 0 = t0< t1 < ⋯ < tk < tk+1 < ⋯, σ (t) is continuous from right everywhere. When t ∈ [tk, tk+1), the σ (tk) subsystem is activated, and σ (tk) = i, .
The T-S fuzzy model which is described by fuzzy IF-THEN rules [14] is employed here to represent each subsystem of the switched nonlinear systems (1).
Rule m for the subsystem i: IF νi1 (t) is Ni1m and ⋯ and νig (t) is Nigm, THEN
where νi (t) = (νi1 (t) , νi2 (t) , ⋯ , νig (t)) are some measurable premise variables and Nipm (p = 1, 2, ⋯ , g) are fuzzy sets. The matrices Aim, Bim, Di1m, Di2m and Eim are system matrices with appropriate dimensions.
By using “fuzzy blending”, the final output of the ith subsystem is inferred as follows:
where , r is the number of IF-THEN rules, and Nipm (νip (t)) is the grade of the membership function of νip in Nipm. It is assumed that lim (t) ≥0 for all t. Therefore, the normalized membership function him (t) satisfies
For the ith subsystem, the state feedback controller has the following form
By substituting (5) into (3), the following closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy systems are obtained
where .
Now, the following assumptions and definitions are introduced, which are needed in the process of obtaining the main results of this paper.
Definition 1. [1] The switched T-S fuzzy system (6) with u (t) ≡0 and w (t) ≡0 is globally uniformly asymptotically stable (GUAS) if there exists a class function β such that for all initial conditions x (t0) and all switching signals σ (t), the solutions of the systems (6) satisfy the following inequality
Definition 2. [4] For a switching signal σ (t) and any T2 ≥ T1 ≥ 0, let Nσ (T1, T2) denote the number of switching of σ (t) over (T1, T2). We say that σ (t) has an average dwell time τa if there exist two constants N0 > 0 and τa > 0 such that the following inequality holds:
Assumption 1. [37] , let matrices Φ, Ψ1, Ψ2 and Ψ3 satisfy the following conditions:
Φ = ΦT, Ψ1 = and Ψ3 = .
Φ ≥ 0, Ψ1 ≤ 0 and Ψ3 ≥ 0.
∥Di2m ∥ · ∥ Φ ∥ =0.
(∥ Ψ1 ∥ + ∥ Ψ2 ∥) · ∥ Φ ∥ = 0.
.
Motivated by [37], and combined with the characteristics of switched systems, in this paper, a novel performance index is introduced in the Definition 3.
Definition 3. For given matrices Φ, Ψ1, Ψ2 and Ψ3 satisfying the Assumption 1, the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) is said to be extended dissipative if there exist scalars λ > 0 and ρ ≥ 0 such that the following inequality holds for any t > 0 and all w (t) ∈ L2 [0, ∞):
where J (s) = zT (s) Ψ1z (s) +2zT (s) Ψ2w (s) + wT (s) Ψ3w (s). Since Ψ3 ≥ 0 and λ > 0, from (7), the following inequality can be obtained
where . Furthermore, since Φ ≥ 0, ρ ≥ 0 and λ > 0, from (7), the following inequality can be obtained
It can be seen from the Definition 3 that the following performance indexes hold by choosing appropriate parameter values for Φ, Ψ1, Ψ2, Ψ3 and ρ.
Choosing Φ = 0, Ψ1 = - I, Ψ2 = 0, Ψ3 = γ2I and ρ = 0, the inequality (8) reduces to the weighted H∞ performance index [9, 13].
Letting Φ = I, Ψ1 = 0, Ψ2 = 0, Ψ3 = γ2I and ρ = 0, the inequality (8) becomes the L2 - L∞ (energy-to-peak) performance index [35, 36].
If the dimension of output z (t) is the same as that of disturbance w (t), then inequality (9) with Φ = 0, Ψ1 = 0, Ψ2 = I, Ψ3 = γI and ρ = 0 becomes the passivity performance index [30, 31].
Letting β > 0, Φ = 0, Ψ1 = Q, Ψ2 = S, Ψ3 = R - βI and ρ = 0, the inequality (9) reduces to the strict (Q, S, R)-dissipativity performance index [32–34].
Note from the Assumption 1 that Φ ≥ 0 and Ψ1 ≤ 0. Thus, there always exist matrices and such that
Remark 1. It is necessary for us to give some explanations about the Assumption 1. The first item of the Assumption 1 guarantees that the inequality (7) is well defined. The second item enables one to derive a linear matrix inequality (LMI)-based condition for the investigation of the dissipativity analysis problem. Assumptions similar to 1), 2), and 5) of the Assumption 1 were used in [32–34]. On the other hand, it has been pointed out when considering the L2 - L∞ performance, the output of the considered system should not include disturbance inputs [38]. Therefore, it should be assumed that Di2 = 0 when Φ ≠ 0, which justifies the need of the third item of Assumption 1. Finally, the fourth item of Assumption 1 is technically necessary for the development of our analysis and design methods.
Remark 2. It can be seen from the Definition 3 that if the inequality (7) holds, then the inequalities (8) and (9) hold. The inequality (8) can reduce to the weighted H∞ performance index and L2 - L∞ performance index. The inequality (9) can reduce to the passivity performance index and the strict (Q, S, R)-dissipativity performance index. Therefore, to prove the continuous-time switched systems can achieve a unified performance index which includes the weighted H∞, L2 - L∞, passivity and the strict (Q, S, R)-dissipativity performance indices, the inequality (7) only need to be proven to hold for the continuous-time switched systems.
Remark 3. It should be mentioned that the new performance index defined in the Definition 3 can be used to study the control synthesis problems for a variety of switched systems, for example networked control switched systems and so on.
Our aim in this paper is to design the state feedback controllers (5), such that the corresponding closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) is GUAS and satisfies the novel performance index defined in the Definition 3.
Main results
This section is concerned with the problem of the controller design for the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6). To begin with, the Lemma 1 is given, which is useful in the state feedback controller (5) design.
Lemma 1.Consider the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) and let α > 0 and μ ≥ 1 be given constants. For given matrices Φ, Ψ1, Ψ2 and Ψ3 satisfying the Assumption 1 and (10), , if there exist matrices Pi > 0, Gi > 0 and Li > 0 satisfying the following LMIs
where
then the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) is GUAS for any switching signal satisfying
and satisfies the new performance index defined in the Definition 3.
Proof. Choose the following multiple Lyapunov functions for the system (6)
From the equality (16), the following equality can be obtained
Assume that the subsystem is switching from the jth subsystem to the ith subsystem. Together (16) with (17), the following equality can be obtained
where
By Schur complement, the inequality (14) implies Π < 0, then
At the switching instant tk, together (11) with (16), the following inequality can be obtained
Together (19) with (20) and by induction, the following inequality can be obtained
where
From the Definition 2, the following inequality holds
If supposing
a sufficient condition that guarantees the GUAS of the closed-loop switched nonlinear system is obtained. The inequality (22) can be rewritten as follows
Then we can draw a conclusion that V (t) →0 as t→ ∞ if (15) is satisfied.
In the following, the performance index for the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) is established. From (21), the following inequality can be obtained
Multiplying both sides of (23) by e-Nσ(0,t)ln μ, the following inequality holds
Since -α (t - s) <0 and e-Nσ(0,t)ln μ < 1, the following inequality can be obtained from (24)
From the Definition 2, the following inequality holds
Combining (15), (25) and (26), if let the inequality (27) hold, then the inequality (25) holds
By setting the scalar ρ as ρ = - V (t0), the following inequality can be obtained from (27)
It can be obtained from with Gi > 0 that
By letting , from (13) and (29), the following inequality holds
Together (16) with (30), the following inequality can be obtained
Combining (28) with (31), the following inequality can be obtained
According to the Definition 3, for any matrices Φ, Ψ1, Ψ2 and Ψ3 satisfying the Assumption 1, the following inequality should be proven to be held
The proof process is divided into two cases: (I) ∥Φ ∥ =0, (II) ∥Φ ∥ ≠0.
(I): ∥Φ ∥ =0
From (32), the following inequality can be obtained
This implies that the (33) holds because of zT (t) Φz (t) =0.
(II): ∥Φ ∥ ≠0
In this case, it can be concluded from the Assumption 1 that ∥Ψ1 ∥ + ∥ Ψ2 ∥ =0 and Di2m = 0 which implies that Ψ1 = 0, Ψ2 = 0 and Ψ3 > 0. By using Schur complement to (12) and with , it can be obtained that . Then, the following inequality holds
Based on the above two cases, it can be concluded that the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) can achieve the new performance index defined in the Definition 3. The proof is ended.
Remark 4. Following the same procedure in the proof of Lemma 1, it can be concluded that the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) with w (t) =0 is GUAS for any switching signal satisfying (15).
In Lemma 1, the controller parameter matrices are coupled with matrix variables Pi in (14). To decouple the variables in (14), a decoupling technique is introduced in the following lemma.
Lemma 2.Consider the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) and let α > 0 and μ ≥ 1 be given constants. For given matrices Φ, Ψ1, Ψ2 and Ψ3 satisfying the Assumption 1 and (10). , if there exist matrices Li > 0, Gi > 0 and Wi (t) satisfying
where
then the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) is GUAS for any switching signal satisfying (15) and satisfies the new performance index defined in the Definition 3. Moreover, if there exist feasible matrices Li and Wi (t), the switching state feedback controller gains are given as:
Proof. Letting and , and substituting them into the (39), the following inequality can be obtained
where
Multiplying (41) from the left and right, respectively, by diag (Pi, I, I) and its transpose, the following inequality holds
where
Since , it can be seen that the condition (1) of Lemma 1 is satisfied. From (36) and , the following inequality holds
Thus, in addition to (37) and (38), all the conditions of Lemma 1 are satisfied. Therefore, the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) is GUAS and satisfies the new performance index defined in the Definition 3. The proof is completed.
The following theorem provides the stabilization conditions with the new performance index defined in the Definition 3 for the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6), which are the main results of this paper.
Theorem 1.Consider the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) and let α > 0 and μ ≥ 1 be given constants. For given matrices Φ, Ψ1, Ψ2 and Ψ3 satisfying the Assumption 1 and (10). , if there exist matrices Li > 0, Gi > 0 and Wim satisfying
where
then the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) is GUAS for any switching signal satisfying (15) and satisfies the new performance index defined in the Definition 3. Moreover, if there exist feasible matrices Li and Wim, the switching state feedback controller gains are given as:
Proof. From Lemma 2, for the switched T-S fuzzy system (6), the Ψi (t) in (39) can be rewritten as
If the conditions (47) and (48) of Theorem 1 are satisfied, it can be obtained Ψi (t) <0. The inequality (38) can be obtained from the inequality (46). Together (44) with (45) and from the Lemmas 1 and 2, it can be concluded that the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) is GUAS and satisfies the new performance index defined in the Definition 3. Finally, by (40), the switching state feedback controller gains can be given as (49). The proof is ended.
Example
In this section, a numerical example is provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the state feedback control scheme developed in this paper. Based on the Definition 3, by setting ρ = 0, Φ = 0, Ψ1 = - I, Ψ2 = 0, and Ψ3 = γ2I, the weighted H∞ performance is considered for the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6). The effectiveness of other performance indices can also be illustrated following the same way, and they are omitted here.
To design the state feedback controller (5) for the switched T-S fuzzy system (3), let us consider the system (3) consisting of two subsystems (i = 1, 2), and each subsystem has two fuzzy rules (r = 2) where
The fuzzy membership functions are taken as
First, the state response of the uncontrolled switched T-S fuzzy system is shown in Fig. 1. It is clearly shown in Fig. 1 that the uncontrolled system is unstable.
Here, a set of mode-dependent state feedback controllers will be designed such that the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy system (6) is GUAS. The parameters used in Theorem 1 are given as α = 0.2, μ = 1.05 and γ = 1. By Theorem 1, the ADT is obtained as . By using the LMI toolbox in MATLAB to solve the LMIs (44)–(48), it is found that the the LMIs (44)–(48) are feasible. By (49), the controller gains are obtained as follows:
The initial conditions are assumed to be x (t0) = [1, 2] T, and the disturbance input is assumed to be w (t) =0.5 sin(2πt) exp(-0.2t). The state response for the closed-loop switched T-S fuzzy (6) is shown in Fig. 2. It is clearly shown in Fig. 2 that the unstable subsystems have been stabilized by the designed state feedback controllers, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the obtained results in this paper.
Next, by taking the weighted H∞ performance index as an example, a comparison between our work and a related peer work [29] is given to show the advantage of our results. To complete the comparison, some parameters used in [29] are set as Piu = Pi, α1 = α2 = α, μ1 = μ2 = μ, TM = 0. For different α and μ sets, by setting the same parameters for Theorem 1 of our work and Theorem 2 of [29], the minimum values for these two work are computed. The computation results are shown in Table 1. All the results of Table 1 reveal that under the same conditions Theorem 1 of our work has a better performance than Theorem 2 of [29].
Conclusion
The problem of state feedback controller design has been addressed for a class of continuous-time switched nonlinear systems in this paper. The T-S fuzzy model is used here to represent each nonlinear subsystem of the switched nonlinear systems. By proposing a novel performance index, the weighted H∞, L2 - L∞, passive and dissipativity control problems for switched systems are solved in a unified framework. Through the use of the multiple Lyapunov functions approach and ADT technique, the existence conditions of the state feedback controller are obtained. Based on these results, the desired controllers are designed to ensure the switched T-S fuzzy system to be GUAS and satisfy the novel performance index. It is also remarked that the new performance index proposed in this paper can also be used to study the control synthesis problems for other switched systems. Finally, a numerical example is provided to illustrate the applicability of the obtained results. In our future work, based on this new performance index, the filtering problem for switched systems will be studied in a unified framework.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 61374117, 61004048, 61174137, 61104038 and 61374086), the NSF of Jiang Su Province (Grant no. BK2010493), the grant from China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project 2012M510135, the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University, the project form science & technology department of Sichuan province (Grant no. 2013GZ0080), the 973 project 2011CB707000.
References
1.
LiberzonD., Switching in systems and control, Berlin, Germany: Birkhauser, 2003.
2.
BranickyM.S., Multiple Lyapunov functions and other analysis tools for switched and hybrid systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control43(4) (1998), 475–482.
3.
LiberzonD. and MorseA.S., Basic problems in stability and design of switched systems, IEEE Control Systems19(5) (1999), 59–70.
4.
HespanhaJ.P. and MorseA.S., Stability of switched systems with average dwell-time, , Proceedings of the 38th Conference on Decision & Control, USA, 1999, PP. 2655–2660.
5.
LinH. and AntsaklisP.J., Stability and stabilizability of switched linear systems: A survey of recent results, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control54(2) (2009), 308–322.
6.
Mayo-MaldonadoJ.C., RapisardaP. and RochaP., Stability of switched linear differential systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control59(8) (2014), 2038–2051.
7.
ZhaoX., YuQ., ZhangJ. and LiZ., A novel approach to stability analysis for switched positive linear systems, Journal of the Franklin Institute351(7) (2014), 3883–3898.
8.
HajiahmadiM., De SchutterB., and HellendoornH., Design of stabilizing switching laws for mixed switched affine systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control61(6) (2016), 1676–1681.
9.
ZhaiG., HuB., YasudaK. and MichelA.N., Disturbance attenuation properties of time-controlled switched systems, Journal of the Franklin Institute338(7) (2001), 765–779.
10.
SunX., ZhaoJ. and HillD.J., Stability and L2-gain analysis for switched delay systems: A delay-dependent method, Automatica42(10) (2006), 1769–1774.
11.
ZhangL. and GaoH., Asynchronously switched control of switched systems with average dwell time, Automatica46(5) (2010), 953–958.
12.
YuanC. and WuF., Hybrid control for switched linear systems with average dwell time, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control60(1) (2015), 240–245.
13.
ZhangH., WangB., XieD., XuS. and DangC., Stability, L2-gain and asynchronous H∞ control for continuous-time switched systems, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control25(4) (2015), 575–587.
14.
TakagiT. and SugenoM., Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics15(1) (1985), 116–132.
15.
TanakaK. and WangH.O., Fuzzy control systems design and analysis: A linear matrix inequality approach, New York: Wiley, 2001.
16.
DangT., WangW., HuangC., SunC. and LuohL., Observer synthesis for the T-S fuzzy system with uncertainty and out-put disturbance, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems22(4) (2011), 173–183.
17.
TongS., WangT., LiY. and ChenB., A combined backstepping and stochastic small-gain approach to robust adaptive fuzzy output feedback control, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems21(2) (2013), 314–327.
18.
XieX., YueD., MaT. and ZhuX., Further studies on control synthesis of discretetime T-S fuzzy systems via augmented multi-indexed matrix approach, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics44(12) (2014), 2784–2791.
19.
GaoY. and LiuY., Adaptive fuzzy optimal control using direct heuristic dynamic programming for chaotic discrete-time system, Journal of Vibration and Control (2014), 1–9.
20.
LiuY., TongS., LiD. and GaoY., Fuzzy adaptive control with state observer for a class of nonlinear discrete-time systems with input constraint, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (2015). https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1109/TFUZZ.2015. 2505088.
21.
LiuY. and TongS., Adaptive fuzzy control for a class of unknown nonlinear dynamical systems, Fuzzy Sets and Systems263(15) (2015), 49–70.
22.
HeN., GaoQ., ShenL., YaoK. and JiangC., Robust adaptive fuzzy control design for nearspace vehicle, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems29 (2015), 2505–2511.
23.
LiH., GaoY., ShiP. and LamH.K., Observer-based fault detection for nonlinear systems with sensor faultand limited communication capacity, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control61(9) (2016), 2745–2751.
24.
HuangL., XieX., ZhaoY. and HuZ., Disturbance attenuation observer design for fuzzy time-delay system with fault, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems30 (2016), 811–819.
25.
LaiG., LiuZ., ZhangY., ChenC.L.P., XieS. and LiuY., Fuzzy adaptive inverse compensation method to tracking control of uncertain nonlinear systems with generalized actuator dead zone, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systemshttps://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2554152
26.
LiuY., GaoY., TongS. and LiY., Fuzzy approximation-based adaptive backstepping optimal control for a class of nonlinear discrete-time systems with dead-zone, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems24(1) (2016), 16–28.
27.
MaoY., ZhangH. and XuS., Exponential stability and asynchronous stabilization of a class of switched nonlinear system via T-S fuzzy model, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems22(4) (2014), 817–828.
28.
ZhaoX., YinY., ZhangL. and YangH., Control of switched nonlinear systems via T-S fuzzy modeling, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems24(1) (2016), 235–241.
29.
ZhengQ. and ZhangH., Asynchronous H∞ fuzzy control for a class of switched nonlinear systems via switching fuzzy Lyapunov function approach, Neurocomputing182 (2016), 178–186.
30.
ZhaoJ. and HillD.J., Passivity and stability of switched systems: A multiple storage function method, Systems & Control Letters57 (2008), 158–164.
31.
LianJ., ShiP. and FengZ., Passivity and passification for a class of uncertain switched stochastic time-delay systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control43(1) (2013), 3–13.
32.
MahmoudM.S., Delay-dependent dissipativity analysis and synthesis of switched delay systems, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control21(1) (2011), 1–20.
33.
WuL., ZhengW. and GaoH., Dissipativity-based sliding mode control of switched stochastic systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control58(3) (2013), 785–791.
34.
ShiP., SuX. and LiF., Dissipativity-based filtering for fuzzy switched systems with stochastic perturbation, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control61(6) (2016), 1694–1699.
35.
WuL. and HoD.W.C., Reduced-order L2 –L∞ filtering for a class of nonlinear switched stochastic systems, IET Control Theory and Applications3(5) (2009), 493–508.
36.
WuL., QiT. and FengZ., Average dwell time approach to L2–L∞ control of switched delay systems via dynamic output feedback, IET Control Theory and Applications3(10) (2009), 1425–1436.
37.
ZhangB., ZhengW. and XuS., Filtering of Markovian jump delay systems based on a new performance index, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I: Regular Papers60(5) (2013), 1250–1263.
38.
GrigoriadisK.M. and WatsonJ.T.Jr,
, Reduced-order H∞ and L2 – L∞ filtering via linear matrix inequalities, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems33(4) (1997), 1326–1338.