Many universities have increased the emphasis onfaculty
research and publication productivity as a means of enhanc
ing their reputation. Such emphasis contributes to the in
creased competition for available journal space, heightened
pressures on the efficiency of the editorial system, and in
creases the temptation to lower ethical research and publi
cation standards. A survey of 328 marketing academicians
about their perceptions of ethical and unethical research and
publication practices for academicians, editors, and review
board members revealed wide variation among respondents'
perceptions of what constitutes ethical academic conduct. In
particular, the respondent's level of publication experience
was found to be significantly related to his/her assessment of
the ethicality of research practices. The authors suggest that
a recognized code of ethics for the marketing academic
community would be valuable in maintaining professional
standards, increase justice in the academic reward system,
and further the growth of knowledge in our discipline.