Incomplete information regarding the location of job offers, their contractual conditions, and tenure prospects typifies US labor markets. Crises of spatial coordination and the allocation of labor demand and supply, amongst other issues, are argued to result from such uncertainties. Assisted-mobility and spatial job-matching programs have been promoted as solutions to problems of inadequate information. These programs, however, ignore the fact that uncertainty is part of any rule-oriented exchange process. These programs also neglect the power relations between employers and employees which structure and sustain labor-market transaction costs. The crucial issue is the distribution of transaction costs between contracting parties. These principles are applied to a recent legal case in Michigan involving interregional labor migration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtiyahP S, 1979The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract (Oxford University Press, London)
2.
AtiyahP S, 1981Promises, Morals, and Law (Clarendon Press, London)
3.
BailyM N, 1982, “Are the new economic models the answer?”The Brookings Review111–14
4.
BuiterW, 1980, “The macroeconomics of Dr Pangloss: A critical survey of the new classical economics”The Economic Journal9034–50
5.
CalabresiGMelamedA D, 1972, “Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: One view of the cathedral”Harvard Law Review851089–1128
6.
ClarkG L, 1981, “The employment relation and spatial division of employment: A hypothesis”Annals of the Association of American Geographers71412–424
7.
ClarkG L, 1983a, “Fluctuations and rigidities in local labor markets. Part 1: Theory and evidence”Environment and Planning A15165–185
8.
ClarkG L, 1983b, “Government policy and the form of local labor markets”Urban Geography41–15
9.
ClarkG L, 1983cInterregional Migration, National Policy and Social Justice (Rowman and Allenheld, Totowa, NJ)
10.
ClarkG LWhitemanJ, 1983, “Why poor people do not move: Job search behavior and disequilibrium amongst local labor markets”Environment and Planning A1585–104
11.
CoaseR, 1960, “The problem of social cost”Journal of Law and Economics31–44
12.
ColemanJ, 1980, “Efficiency, utility and wealth maximization”Hofstra Law Review8509–551
13.
DahlmanC J, 1979, “The problem of externality”Journal of Law and Economics22141–162
14.
DBA, 1931, Davis-Bacon Act of 1931; 40 USC §276a–5 (1976)
15.
DworkinR, 1972, “Social rules and legal theory”Yale Law Journal81855–890
16.
DworkinR, 1981, “What is equality?”Philosophy and Public Affairs10185–246 and 283–345
17.
EisenbergM, 1982, “The bargain principle and its limits”Harvard Law Review95741–801
18.
GordonR J, 1981Macroeconomics (McGraw-Hill, New York)
19.
Hackett v Foodmaker Inc., 1976, 69 Mich App 59 (1976); 245 NW 2d series 140 Mich
20.
HahnF, 1983Money and Inflation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
21.
HallR E, 1980, “Comments” in Rational Expectations and Economic Policy Ed. FisherS, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 190–191
22.
HartH L A, 1961The Concept of Law (Oxford University Press, London)
23.
HarveyD, 1982The Limits to Capital (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
24.
Hutton v Walters, 1915, 132 Tenn 527 SW 134 (1915)
25.
KennedyD, 1976, “Form and substance in private law adjudication”Harvard Law Review89685–778
26.
KennedyDMichelmanF, 1980, “Are property and contract efficient?”Hofstra Law Review8711–770
27.
KuhnS, 1982Computer Manufacturing in New England (Joint Center for Urban Studies of MIT and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA)
28.
LucasR, 1981Studies in Business-cycle Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
29.
McKenzieR B, 1981, “The case for plant closures”Policy Review15119–134
30.
MacNeilI R, 1980The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
31.
MacNeilI R, 1981, “Economic analysis of contractual relations: Its shortfalls and the need for a rich classificatory apparatus”Northwestern University Law Review751018–1045
32.
MorishimaMCatephoresG, 1978Value, Exploitation and Growth (McGraw-Hill, New York)
33.
MurgG EScharmanC, 1982, “Employment at will: Do the exceptions overwhelm the rule?”Boston College Law Review23329–384
34.
MuthR, 1961, “Rational expectations and the theory of price movements”Econometrica29315–335
35.
National Research Council, 1983Rethinking Cities: Urban Policy for an Advanced Economy (National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC)
36.
PosnerR, 1981The Economics of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
37.
President's Commission on an Agenda for the Eighties, 1980Urban America in the Eighties (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
38.
RogersonPMacKinnonR D, 1981, “A geographical model of job search, migration and unemployment”Papers of the Regional Science Association4889–102
39.
RogersonPMacKinnonR D, 1982, “Interregional migration models with source and interaction information”Environment and Planning A14445–454
40.
StoneK, 1981, “The post-war paradigm in American labor law”Yale Law Journal901509–1580
41.
TushnetM V, 1983, “Following the rules laid down: A critique of interpretivism and neutral principles”Harvard Law Review96781–827
42.
UngerR M, 1981PoliticsHarvard Law School, Cambridge, MA
43.
UngerR M, 1983, “The critical legal studies movement”Harvard Law Review96561–675
44.
USHUD, 1982The President's National Urban Policy ReportUS Department of Housing and Urban Development (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
