Climate change is quickly becoming a ubiquitous socionatural reality, mediating extremes of sociospatial scale from the bodily to the planetary. Although environmentalism invites us to ‘think globally and act locally’, the meaning of these scalar designations remains ambiguous. This paper explores the topological presuppositions of social theory in the context of global climate change, asking how carbon emissions ‘translate’ into various sociomaterial forms. Staging a meeting between Tim Ingold's phenomenology of globes and spheres and the social topologies of actor-network theory (ANT), the paper advances a ‘relational-scalar’ analytics of spatial practices, technoscience, and power. As technoscience gradually constructs a networked global climate, this ‘grey box’ comes to circulate within fluid social spaces, taking on new shades as it hybridizes knowledges, symbols, and practices. Global climates thus come in multiple interfering versions, and we need to pay attention to both continuities and overflows, as illustrated in the paper by controversies surrounding transnational carbon markets. The relational-scalar analytics of ANT, I contend, are well suited to navigating such shifting terrains, a task central to the intellectual as well as practical challenges raised by the climate crisis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgarwalANarainS, 1991Global Warming in an Unequal World (Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi)
2.
BeckU, 2002, “The cosmopolitan society and its enemies”Theory, Culture and Society19(1/2) 17–44
3.
BöhringerCMoslenerUSturmB, 2007, “Hot air for sale: A quantitative assessment of Russia's near-term climate policy options”Environmental and Resource Economics38545–572
4.
CallonM, 2009, “Civilizing markets: Carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments”Accounting, Organizations and Society34(3/4) 535–548
5.
CallonMLatourB, 1981, “Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so”, in Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards and Integration of Micro- and Macro-sociologies Ed. Knorr-CetinaK, (Routledge, London) pp 277–303
6.
CollingeC, 2006, “Flat ontology and the deconstruction of scale: A response to Marston, Jones and Woodward”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series31244–251
7.
de CerteauM, 1984The Practice of Everyday Life (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
8.
DeleuzeGGuattariF, 1988, “Introduction: Rhizome”, in A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (Athlone Press, London) pp 3–28
9.
FoucaultM, 2007, “Lecture One, 11 January 1978”, in Security, Territory, Population (Palgrave, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 1–28
10.
GadCJensenCB, 2010, “On the consequences of post-ANT”Science, Technology and Human Values3555–80
11.
IngoldT, 1993, “Globes and spheres: The topology of environmentalism”, in Environmentalism: The View from Anthropology Ed. MiltonK, (Routledge, London) pp 31–42
12.
IngoldT, 2000, “To journey along a way of life: Maps, way-finding and navigation”, in The Perception of the Environment (Routledge, London) pp 219–242
13.
IngoldT, 2003, “Two reflections on ecological knowledge”, in Nature Knowledge: Ethnoscience, Cognition, Identity Eds SangaGOrtalliG, (Berghahn, New York) pp 301–311
14.
IngoldT, 2008, “Bindings against boundaries: Entanglements of life in an open world”Environment and Planning A401796–1810
15.
JasanoffS, 2004, “Heaven and earth: The politics of environmental images”, in Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance Eds JasanoffSMartelloML, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 31–52
16.
JensenCB, 2007, “Infrastructural fractals: Revisiting the micro – macro distinction in social theory”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space25832–850
17.
KendallG, 2004, “Global networks, international networks, actor networks”, in Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces Eds LarnerWWaltersW, (Routledge, London) pp 59–75
18.
KnoxHSavageMHarveyP, 2006, “Social networks and the study of relations: Networks as method, metaphor and form”Economy and Society35113–140
19.
LagendijkA, 2002, “Beyond the regional lifeworld against the global systemworld: Towards a relational-scalar perspective on spatial-economic development”Geografiska Annaler, Series B8477–92
20.
LamontMMolnárV, 2002, “The study of boundaries in the social sciences”Annual Review of Sociology28167–195
21.
LatourB, 1987Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
22.
LatourB, 1993We Have Never Been Modern (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
23.
LatourB, 1996, “On actor-network theory: A few clarifications”Soziale Welt47369–382
24.
LatourB, 1999, “On recalling ANT”, in Actor Network Theory and After Eds LawJHassardJ, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 15–25
25.
LatourB, 2004a, “Whose cosmos, which cosmopolitics?”Common Knowledge10450–462
26.
LatourB, 2004b, “Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern”Critical Inquiry30225–248
27.
LatourB, 2005Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network-theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
28.
LawJ, 2004, “And if the global were small and noncoherent? Method, complexity and the baroque”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2213–26
LawJUrryJ, 2004, “Enacting the social”Economy and Society33390–410
33.
LohmannL, 2005, “Marketing and making carbon dumps: Commodification, calculation and counterfactuals in climate change mitigation”Science as Culture14203–235
34.
LövbrandEStrippleJ, 2006, “The climate as political space: On the territorialisation of the global carbon cycle”Review of International Studies32217–235
35.
LövbrandEStrippleJWimanB, 2009, “Earth system governmentality. Reflections on science in the Anthropocene”Global Environmental Change197–13
36.
LoweTBrownKDessaiSde Franca DoriaMHaynesKVincentK, 2006, “Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change”Public Understanding of Science15435–457
37.
LykkeNBryldM, 2000Cosmodolphins: Feminist Cultural Studies of Technology, Animals and the Sacred (Zed Books, London)
38.
MarcusG, 1995, “Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography”Annual Review of Anthropology2495–117
39.
MartelloMLJasanoffS, 2004, “Introduction: Globalization and environmental governance”, in Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance Eds JasanoffSMartelloML, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 1–29
40.
MillerCA, 2001, “Hybrid management: Boundary organisations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime”Science, Technology and Human Values26478–500
41.
MillerCA, 2007, “Democratization, international knowledge institutions, and global governance”Governance20325–357
42.
MolALawJ, 1994, “Regions, network and fluids: Anaemia and social topology”Social Studies of Science24641–671
43.
OelsA, 2005, “Rendering climate change governable: From biopower to advanced liberal government?”Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning7185–207
44.
OngACollierSJ, (Eds), 2005Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (Blackwell, Oxford)
45.
RedcliffMBentonT, (Eds), 1994Social Theory and the Global Environment (Routledge, London)
46.
SethiN, 2007, “Poor joke on carbon credits: NGO transfers Indian farmers' green points to British globetrotters”The Times of India 20 September
47.
SilberIF, 1995, “Space, fields, boundaries: The rise of spatial metaphors in contemporary sociological theory”Social Research62323–355
48.
SloterdijkP, 2004Sphären II: Globen (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main)
49.
StarSLGriesemerJR, 1989, “Institutional ecology, ‘translation’, and boundary objects—amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939”Social Studies of Science19387–420
50.
StrathernM, 2002, “On space and depth”, in Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices Eds LawJMolA, (Duke University Press, Durham, NC) pp 88–115
51.
SzerszynskiBUrryJ, 2002, “Cultures of cosmopolitanism”The Sociological Review50461–481
TsingA, 2005Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
54.
UrryJ, 2000Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century (Routledge, London)
55.
UrryJ, 2008, “Climate change, travel and complex futures”British Journal of Sociology59261–279
56.
van der SluijsJvan EijndhovenJShackleySWynneB, 1998, “Anchoring devices in science for policy: The case of consensus around climate sensitivity”Social Studies of Science28291–323
57.
VossJ-P, 2007, “Innovation processes in governance: The development of ‘emissions trading’ as a new policy instrument”Science and Public Policy34329–343
