The City as Studio;The World as Back Lot: The Impact of Vertical Disintegration on the Location of the Motion Picture Industry

Abstract

Motion picture production is currently carried out by small firms under contract to an independent producer rather than in large integrated firms, the major studios. In this paper the emergence of this vertically disintegrated industry is traced and its impact on the location of the motion picture industry is analyzed. Vertical disintegration has led to a reagglomeration of motion picture employment and establishments in Los Angeles, despite the dispersal of film shooting throughout the world. The processes that are shaping the present-day organization of motion pictures can be observed across a range of industries. An examination of these processes in motion pictures suggests that their association with reagglomeration in urban centers could have an important impact on patterns of urbanization.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bagnasco

, 1977 Tre Italie: La Problematica dello Svillupo (Il Mulino, Bologna)

Bernstein

, 1957, “The changing motion picture industry” Institute for Industrial Relations, University of California, Los Angeles

Brusco

Sabel

, 1983, “Artisanal production and economic growth” in The Dynamics of Labor Market Segmentation Ed. Wilkinson

, (Academic Press, London) pp 99–113

Hollywood Reporter Studio Blu-Book Directory (annual) (Hollywood Reporter, Los Angeles, CA)

Holmes

, 1986, “The organization and locational structure of production subcontracting” in Production, Work, Territory: The Geographical Anatomy of Industrial Capitalism Eds Scott

A J

Storper

, (Allen and Unwin, Winchester, MA) pp 80–106

Ikeda

, 1979, “The subcontracting system in the Japanese electronic industry” Engineering Industries of Japan 19 43–71

International Motion Picture Industry Almanac 1933–1985 (annual) (Quigley Publications, New York)

Morris

, 1980, “Los Angeles, the know-how city” in Destinations (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 42–57

Nicolaides

, (Ed.), 1984 The Production Company: The Complete Guide to Commercial and Industrial Production Companies in Los Angeles 1984 edition (Parmorand Publications, Los Angeles, CA)

10.

Piore

Sabel

, 1984 The Second Industrial Divide (Basic Books, New York)

11.

Sayer

, 1985, “New developments in manufacturing and their spatial implications: From flexible manufacturing systems to just-in time” paper presented at conference on Spatial Structures and Social Processes, Lesbos, Greece; WP49, Urban and Regional Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, Sussex

12.

Scott

, 1985, “Industrial organization and location: Division of labor, the firm, and spatial process” Department of Geography, University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

13.

Storper

Christopherson

, 1985, “The changing location and organization of the motion picture industry: Interregional shifts in the United States” School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of California – Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

14.

US v Paramount Pictures, 1948, 334 US 131 (1948)

15.

Waterman

, 1978 Economic Essays on the Theatrical Motion Picture Industry PhD dissertation, Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

16.

Waterman

, 1982, “The structural development of the motion picture industry” American Economist 26 16–27