The significance of the changing meaning of the inner city to the process of gentrification is explored. Recent researchers taking a ‘production of gentrifiers' perspective have focused on how restructuring of production and reproduction has generated a growth in the number of households which are most likely to benefit from inner-city living. That argument is extended with reference to cultural change, interweaving theoretical issues with an account of the postmodern landscape of a redeveloped neighbourhood in Vancouver, Canada. Connections are made between a number of practices, including planning and architectural design, advertising and marketing strategy, and the life-style of ‘New Class' gentrifiers. Dynamic relations between emergent and dominant cultures are traced in terms of their impact on the transformation of this landscape. Postmodern landscapes are ambiguous in their meaning; they have come to represent both a reaction against corporate visions of the city, and a confirmation of the vigour of the commodity form. This tension is examined in terms of the interplay between the construction of the postmodern landscape and the constitution of gentrifiers as a social group.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnewJ-C, 1983, “The consuming vision of Henry James”, in The Culture of Consumption: Critical Essays in American History Eds FoxR WLearsT J J, (Pantheon Books, New York) pp 67–100
2.
AIA, 1983, “Postmodernism: Definition and debate”Journal of the American Institute of Architects72238–301
3.
AndersonK, 1988, “Cultural hegemony and the race definition process in Chinatown, Vancouver, 1880–1980”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6127–149
4.
BeauregardR, 1986, “The chaos and complexity of gentrification”, in Gentrification of the City Eds SmithNWilliamsP, (Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts) pp 35–55
5.
BelkR W, 1986, “Yuppies as arbiters of the emerging consumption style”Advances in Consumer Research13514–519
6.
BellD, 1973The Coming of Post-industrial Society (Basic Books, New York)
7.
BellD, 1980The Winding Passage (Basic Books, New York)
8.
CosgroveD E, 1984Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape (Croom Helm, Beckenham, Kent)
9.
CosgroveD EJacksonP, 1987, “New directions in cultural geography”Area1995–101
10.
CsikszentmihalyiMRochberg-HaltonE, 1981The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
11.
DanielsS J, (forthcoming), “Marxism, culture and the duplicity of landscapes”, in New Models in Geography Eds PeetRThriftN, (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants)
12.
DanielsS JCosgroveD E, 1988, “Iconography and landscape”, in The Iconography of Landscape Eds CosgroveD EDanielsS J, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) forthcoming
13.
DearM J, 1986, “Postmodernism and planning”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space4367–384
14.
DigginsJ P, 1977, “Reification and the cultural hegemony of capitalism: The perspectives of Marx and Veblen”Social Research44354–383
15.
DuncanJDuncanN, 1988, “(Re)Reading the landscape”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6117–126
16.
ElligottRZachariasJ, 1973, “Report: Fairview Slopes”, City of Vancouver Planning Department, 2675 Yukon St, Vancouver V5Y 3P9
17.
FitzgeraldD, 1986, “A new slant on The Slopes”Western Living 16 January issue, pp 18–21 (Comac Communications, Vancouver)
18.
FosterH, 1983, “Postmodernism: A preface”, in The Anti-aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture Ed. FosterH, (Bay Press, Port Townsend, WA) pp ix–xvi
19.
FosterH, 1985, “(Post)modern polemics”, in Recodings: Art, Spectacle, Cultural Politics Ed. FosterH, (Bay Press, Port Townsend, WA) pp 121–136
20.
FramptonK, 1983, “Towards a critical regionalism: Six points for an architecture of resistance”, in The Anti-aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture Ed. FosterH, (Bay Press, Port Townsend, WA) pp 16–30
21.
FrancisR, 1983, “Symbols, images and social organization in urban sociology”, in Urban Social Research: Problems and Prospects Eds PonsVFrancisR, (Routledge and Kegan Paul, Andover, Hants) pp 115–145
22.
GeertzC, 1973The Interpretation of Cultures (Basic Books, New York)
23.
GibsonE, 1984, “Traditions of landscape aesthetics: 1700–1985”, research paper; mimeo available from Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC
24.
GibsonE, 1986Award-winning Vancouver Architecture: InventoryContinuing Studies, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, and Architectural Institute of British Columbia
25.
GiddensA, 1973The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies (Hutchinson, London)
26.
GouldnerA W, 1979The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class (Continuum, New York)
27.
GruftA, 1983, “Vancouver Architecture: The last fifteen years”, in Vancouver: Art and Artists 1931–1983 (Vancouver Art Gallery, Vancouver) pp 318–331
28.
GutsteinD, 1983, “Peril on the Slopes”Vancouver Magazine 16 February issue, pp 32–35, 56–57 (Comac Communications, Vancouver)
29.
GutsteinD, 1985, “Love to live there”Vancouver Magazine 18 October issue, pp 22–26, 54–58 (Comac Communications, Vancouver)
30.
HamnettC, 1984, “Gentrification and residential location theory: A review and assessment”, in Geography and the Urban Environment, Volume 6 Eds HerbertD TJohnstonR J, (John Wiley, New York) pp 283–319
31.
HirschF, 1976The Social Limits to Growth (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
32.
HuyssenA, 1984, “Mapping the postmodern”New German Critique335–52
33.
JacobsJ, 1983, “Modern, post modern or what?”The Canadian Architect2821–31
34.
JagerM, 1986, “Class definition and the aesthetics of gentrification: Victoriana in Melbourne”, in Gentrification of the City Eds SmithNWilliamsP, (Allen and Unwin, Hemel Hempstead, Herts) pp 78–91
35.
JamesonF, 1983, “Postmodernism and consumer society”, in The Anti-aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture Ed. FosterH, (Bay Press, Port Townsend, WA) pp 111–125
36.
JamesonF, 1984a, “Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism”New Left Reviewnumber 146, pp 53–92
37.
JamesonF, 1984b, “The politics of theory: Ideological positions in the postmodernism debate”New German Critique3353–65
38.
JencksC, 1981The Language of Post-modern Architecture3rd edition (Rizzoli, New York)
39.
JencksC, 1986What is Post-modernism? (St Martin's Press, New York)
40.
JhallySKlineSLeissW, 1985, “Magic in the marketplace: An empirical test for commodity fetishism”Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory91–22
41.
KlineSLeissW, 1978, “Advertising, needs, and ‘commodity fetishism’”Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory25–30
42.
LautensT, 1987, “Pray, save us from this awful phrase”The Vancouver Sun 10 October, page B9
43.
LearsT J J, 1983, “From salvation to self-realization: Advertising and the therapeutic roots of the consumer culture, 1880–1930”, in The Culture of Consumption: Critical Essays in American History Eds FoxR WLearsT J J, (Pantheon Books, New York) pp 3–38
44.
LearsT J J, 1985, “The concept of cultural hegemony: Problems and possibilities”American Historical Review90567–593
45.
LeissW, 1978, “Needs, exchanges and the fetishism of objects”Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory227–48
46.
LeissW, 1983, “The icons of the market place”Theory, Culture and Society110–21
47.
LeyD, 1980, “Liberal ideology and the postindustrial city”Annals of the Association of American Geographers70238–258
48.
LeyD, 1985, “Cultural/humanistic geography”Progress in Human Geography9415–423
49.
LeyD, 1986, “Modernism, post-modernism and the struggle for place”, paper presented to the seminar series The Power of Place, Syracuse University; mimeo available from Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
50.
LeyD, 1987a, “Styles of the times: Liberal and neo-conservative landscapes in inner Vancouver, 1968–1986”Journal of Historical Geography1340–56
51.
LeyD, 1987b, “Reply: The rent gap revisited”Annals of the Association of American Geographers77465–468
52.
LeyD, 1988, “Attributes of areas undergoing social upgrading in six Canadian cities”The Canadian Geographer32 (forthcoming)
53.
LeyDHuttonT, 1987, “Vancouver's corporate complex and producer services sector: Linkages and divergence within a provincial staples economy”Regional Studies21413–424
54.
LeyDMillsC A, 1988, “Labour markets, housing markets and the changing family in Canada's service economy”, in Industrial Transformation and Challenge in Australia and Canada Eds HayterRWildeP, (Carleton University Press, Ottawa) in press
55.
LeyDOldsK, 1988, “Landscape as spectacle: World's fairs and the culture of heroic consumption”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space6191–212
56.
McCrackenG, 1986, “Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods”Journal of Consumer Research1371–84
57.
McMartinP, 1986, “A costly obsession”The Vancouver Sun 27 August, page B5
58.
MarkusenA, 1981, “City spatial structure, women's household work, and national urban policy”, in Women and the City Eds StimpsonC RDixlerENewlsonM JYatrakisK B, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 20–41
59.
MitchellW J T, 1986Iconology, Image, Text, Ideology (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL)
60.
MooreA C, 1980, “The retreat into architectural narcissism”Journal of the American Institute of Architects6946–68
61.
MooreP W, 1982, “Gentrification and the residential geography of the New Class”, research paper; mimeo available from Department of Geography, Scarborough College, University of Toronto, Ontario
62.
Ovenell-CarterJ, 1986, “The arrival of Jim Cheng”Western Living 16 August issue, pp 25c–25t (Comac Communications, Vancouver)
63.
PolanD, 1984, Review of The Anti-aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture Ed. FosterH, New German Critique33264–269
64.
RabanJ, 1974Soft City (Dutton, New York)
65.
RoseD, 1984, “Rethinking gentrification: Beyond the uneven development of Marxist urban theory”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space247–74
66.
SahlinsM, 1976Culture and Practical Reason (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
67.
SaundersP, 1981Social Theory and the Urban Question (Hutchinson, London)
68.
SmithN, 1979, “Toward a theory of gentrification: A back to the city movement by capital not people”Journal of the American Planners Association45538–548
69.
SmithN, 1982, “Gentrification and uneven development”Economic Geography58139–155
70.
SmithN, 1987a, “Of yuppies and housing: Gentrification, social restructuring, and the urban dream”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space5151–172
71.
SmithN, 1987b, “Gentrification and the rent gap”Annals of the Association of American Geographers77462–465
72.
VeblenT, 1953The Theory of the Leisure Class (New American Library, New York)
73.
WaltersR G, 1980, “Signs of the times: Clifford Geertz and Historians”Social Research47537–556
74.
WilliamsR, 1980Problems in Materialism and Culture (Verso Editions and NLB, London)
75.
WrightE O, 1978Class, Crisis and the State (New Left Books, London)
76.
YagodaB, 1979, “Lifestyle, then and now”Dissent26233–234
77.
ZukinS, 1982Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
