Human geography critiques of GIS are operationalized under a unique interpretation of ontology and epistemology. Internal to poststructuralism, this metaphysics collapses the traditional separation between ontology and epistemology, reducing ontological questions to epistemological constructs. Although critiques have moved beyond an initial fixation upon positivism, critical/cultural assessments of GIS tendered within the last ten years continue to motivate epistemology as a basis for its deconstruction. The epistemological reductionism of such a reading of the technology inappropriately abstracts GIS from its ontic basis in computing, giving rise to a fundamental ‘disconnect’ of poststructuralist metaphysics to the technology. This disconnect is identified in terms of (1) the epistemic fallacy, which, underwritten by (2) an ‘undoing’ of the metaphysics of presence, culminates in (3) an effective ‘deontologization’ of an immediately ontic entity. This does not negate the poststructuralist critique of GIS, but it necessitates that critical engagements of the technology accord a material ontological ground to the objects of critique.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AblerR F, 1993, “Everything in its place: GPS, GIS, and geography in the 1990′s”The Professional Geographer45131–139
2.
AgarwalP, 2005, “Ontological considerations in GIScience”International Journal of Geographical Information Science19501–536
3.
AgnewJ, 2006, “Open to surprise?”Progress in Human Geography301–4
4.
AhlqvistT, 2000, “A quest for polygon landscapes, or GIS and the condition of epistemology”Fennia17897–111
5.
AitkinS CMichelS, 1995, “Who contrives the ‘real’ in GIS? Geographic information, planning, and critical theory”Cartography and Geographic Information Systems2217–29
6.
AyerA J, 1959Logical Positivism (The Free Press, New York)
7.
BarnesT J, 1996Logics of Dislocation: Models, Metaphors, and Meanings of Economic Space (Guilford Press, New York)
8.
BarnesT, 2000, “Foundationalism”, in The Dictionary of Human Geography4th edition, Eds JohnstonR JGregoryDPrattGWattsM, (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 278–279
9.
BaughB, 1992, “Transcendental empiricism: Deleuze's response to Hegel”Man and World25133–148
10.
BhaskarR, 1978A Realist Theory of Science2nd edition (Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ)
11.
BhaskarR, 1986Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation (Verso, London)
12.
BhaskarR, 1989Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy (Verso, London)
13.
BhaskarR, 1993Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom (Verso, New York)
14.
BhaskarR, 2007, “Theorising ontology”, in Contributions to Social Ontology Eds LawsonCLatsisJMartinsN, (Routledge, New York) pp 192–204
15.
BlomleyN, 2006, “Uncritical critical geography?”Progress in Human Geography3087–94
16.
BontaM, 2005, “Becoming-forest, becoming-local: Transformations of a protected area in Honduras”Geoforum3695–112
17.
BrownMKnoppL, 2008, “Queering the map: The productive tensions of colliding epistemologies”Annals of the Association of American Geography9840–58
18.
BryantL R, 2000, “The transcendental empiricism of Gilles Deleuze”, paper presented at the 39th Annual Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy Conference, 5 – 7 October, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
19.
CallardF, 2003, “The taming of psychoanalysis in geography”Social and Cultural Geography4295–312
20.
ChrismanN, 1999, “What does GIS mean?”Transactions in GIS3175–186
21.
CoyneR, 1994, “Heidegger and virtual reality: The implications of Heidegger's thinking for computer representations”Leonardo2765–73
22.
CoyneR, 1995Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age: From Method to Metaphor (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
23.
CraigWHarrisTWeinerD, 2002Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems (Taylor and Francis, London)
24.
CurryM, 1995, “GIS and the inevitability of ethical inconsistency”, in Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems Ed. PicklesJ, (Guilford Press, New York) pp 68–87
25.
CurryM, 1998Digital Places: Living with Geographic Information Technologies (Routledge, London)
26.
DearM, 1988, “The postmodern challenge: Reconstructing human geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series13262–274
27.
DeleuzeG, 1995Difference and Repetition (Columbia University Press, New York)
28.
DeleuzeG, 2004Desert Islands and Other Texts, 1953 – 1974 (Semiotext(e), Los Angeles, CA)
29.
DeleuzeGGuattariF, 1990A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN)
30.
DerridaJ, 1970, “Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of human sciences”, in The Structuralist Controversy Eds MackseyRDonatoE, (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD) pp 247–242
31.
DerridaJ, 1976Of Grammatology (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
32.
DerridaJ, 1978Writing and Difference (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
33.
DixonD PJonesJ PIII, 1998, “My dinner with Derrida, or spatial analysis and poststructuralism do lunch”Environment and Planning A30247–260
34.
DixonD PJonesJ PIII, 2004, “Poststructuralism”, in A Companion to Cultural Geography Eds DuncanJ SJohnsonN CScheinR H, (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 79–107
35.
DoelM, 1999Poststructuralist Geographies: The Diabolical Art of Spatial Science (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh)
36.
ElwoodS, 2002, “GIS use in community planning: A multidimensional analysis of empowerment”Environment and Planning A34905–922
37.
ElwoodS, 2006a, “Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions”Transactions in GIS10693–708
38.
ElwoodS, 2006b, “Negotiation knowledge production: The everyday inclusions, exclusions, and contradictions of participatory GIS research”The Professional Geographer58197–208
39.
FeenbergA, 2000, “The ontic and the ontological in Heidegger's philosophy of technology: Response to Thomson”Inquiry43445–450
40.
FoucaultM, 1972The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language (Pantheon Books, New York)
41.
FrankA U, 2000, “The rationality of epistemology and the rationality of ontology”, in Rationality and Irrationality, Proceedings of the 23rd International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium Eds SmithBBroogardB, (Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna) pp 110–120
42.
GhoseR, 2001, “Use of information technology for community empowerment: Transforming geographic information systems into community information systems”Transactions in GIS5141–163
43.
GoldC M, 2006, “What is GIS and what is not?”Transactions in GIS10505–519
44.
GossJ, 1995a, “Marketing the new marketing: The strategic discourse of geodemographic information systems”, in Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems Ed. PicklesJ, (Guilford Press, New York) pp 130–170
45.
GossJ, 1995b, “‘We know who you are and we know where you live’: The instrumental rationality of geodemographic systems”Economic Geography71171–198
GregoryD, 2000a, “Epistemology”, in The Dictionary of Human Geography4th edition, Eds JohnstonR JGregoryDPrattGWattsM, (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 226–228
48.
GregoryD, 2000b, “Ontology”, in The Dictionary of Human Geography4th edition, Eds JohnstonR JGregoryDPrattGWattsM, (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 561–564
49.
GroffR, 2004Critical Realism, Post-positivism and the Possibility of Knowledge (Routledge, New York)
HalliseyE J, 2005, “Cartographic visualization: An assessment and epistemological review”The Professional Geographer57350–364
52.
HansenF, 1994, “Approaching human geography: Towards new approaches in human geography?”Geografiska Annaler, Series B76211–216
53.
HarleyJ B, 1988, “Maps, knowledge, and power”, in The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design, and Use of Past Environments Eds CosgroveDDanielsS, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 277–311
54.
HarleyJ B, 1989, “Deconstructing the map”Cartographica261–20
55.
HarleyJ B, 1990, “Cartography, ethics and social theory”Cartographica271–23
56.
HarleyJ B, 2001The New Nature of Maps (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
57.
HarrisT MWeinerDWarnerT ALevinR, 1995, “Pursuing social goals through participatory geographic information systems: Redressing South Africa's historical political ecology”, in Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems Ed. PicklesJ, (Guilford Press, New York) pp 196–222
58.
HarveyF, 2003, “Knowledge and geography's technology: Politics, ontologies, representations in the changing ways we know”, in Handbook of Cultural Geography Eds AndersonKDomoshMPileSThriftN, (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 532–543
59.
HarveyFChrismanN, 1998, “Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology”Environment and Planning A301683–1694
60.
HayC, 2007, “Does ontology trump epistemology? Notes on the directional dependence of ontology and epistemology in political analysis”Politics27115–118
61.
HeideggerM, 1977The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays1st edition (Harper and Row, New York)
62.
HoescheleW, 2000, “Geographic information engineering and social ground truth in Attappadi, Kerala State, India”Annals of the Association of American Geographers90293–321
63.
JonesJ PIII, 2003, “Introduction: Reading geography through binary oppositions”, in Handbook of Cultural Geography Eds AndersonKDomoshMPileSThriftN, (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp 511–519
64.
KatzC, 2001, “On the grounds of globalization: A topography for feminist political engagement”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society261213–1234
65.
KingsburyP, 2002, “Science fiction and cinema: The hysterical materialism of pataphysical space”, in Lost in Space: Geographies of Science Fiction Eds KitchinRKnealeJ, (Continuum, London) pp 123–135
66.
KingsburyP, 2003, “Psychoanalysis, a gay spatial science?”Social and Cultural Geography4347–367
67.
KingsburyPJonesJ PIII, 2009, “Beyond Apollo and Adorno: Dionysis and Walter Benjamin on Google Earth”, Geoforum forthcoming
68.
KitcherP, 1998, “A plea for science studies”, in A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science Ed. KoertgeN, (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 32–56
69.
KraftQ G, 1992, “Quentin G. Kraft responds”College English54959–963
70.
KwanM-P, 2002a, “Is GIS for women? Reflections on the critical discourse in the 1990s”Gender, Place and Culture9271–279
71.
KwanM-P, 2002b, “Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research”Annals of the Association of American Geographers92645–661
72.
KwanM-P, 2004, “Beyond difference: From canonical geography to hybrid geographies”Annals of the Association of American Geographers94756–763
73.
KwanM-P, 2007, “Affecting geospatial technologies: Toward a feminist politics of emotion”The Professional Geographer5922–34
74.
LakeR W, 1993, “Planning and applied geography: Positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems”Progress in Human Geography17404–413
75.
LawsonC, 2007, “Technology, technological determinism and the transformational model of social activity”, in Contributions to Social Ontology Eds LawsonCLatsisJMartinsN, (Routledge, New York) pp 32–49
76.
LeszczynskiA, 2009, “Quantitative limits to qualitative engagements: GIS, its critics, and philosophical divide”The Professional Geographer forthcoming
77.
LoweE J, 1998The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time (Clarendon Press, Oxford)
78.
McLaffertyS, 2005, “Women and GIS: Geospatial technologies and feminist geographies”Cartographica4037–45
79.
MarkD M, 2005, “Spatial representation: A cognitive view”, in Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and Applications2nd edition, Eds LongleyP AGoodchildM FMaguireD JRhindD W, (John Wiley, New York) pp 81–89
80.
MarstonS AJonesJ PIIIWoodwardK, 2005, “Human geography without scale”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series30416–432
81.
MonmonierM, 1996How to Lie With Maps2nd edition (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
82.
NatterWSchatzkiT RJonesJ PIII, 1995, “Contexts of objectivity”, in Objectivity and Its Other Eds NatterWSchatzkiT RJonesJ PIII, (Guilford Press, New York) pp 1–17
83.
NiiniluotoI, 1999Critical Scientific Realism (Oxford University Press, New York)
84.
PavlovskayaM, 2006, “Theorizing with GIS: A tool for critical geographies?”Environment and Planning A382003–2020
85.
PeetR, 1998Modern Geographic Thought (Blackwell, Oxford)
86.
PerkinsC, 2003, “Cartography: Mapping theory”Progress in Human Geography27341–351
87.
PicklesJ, 1985Phenomenology, Science and Geography: Spatiality and the Human Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
88.
PicklesJ, 1991, “Geography, GIS, and the surveillant society”Papers and Proceedings of Applied Geography Conferences1480–91
89.
PicklesJ, 1993, “Discourse on method and the history of discipline: Reflections on Jerome Dobson's 1993 ‘automated geography’”The Professional Geographer45451–455
90.
PicklesJ, (Ed.), 1995Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems (Guilford Press, New York)
91.
PicklesJ, 1997, “Tool or science? GIS, technoscience, and the theoretical turn”Annals of the Association of American Geographers87363–372
92.
PicklesJ, 2004A History of Spaces: Cartographic Reason, Mapping and the Geo-coded World (Routledge, New York)
93.
PicklesJ, 2005, “‘New cartographies’ and the decolonization of European geographies”Area37355–364
94.
PoonJ P H, 2005, “Quantitative methods: Not positivistly positivist”Progress in Human Geography29766–772
95.
PopkeE J, 2003, “Poststructuralist ethics: Subjectivity, responsibility and the space of community”Progress in Human Geography27298–316
96.
PrattG, 2000, “Post-structuralism”, in The Dictionary of Human Geography4th edition, Eds JohnstonR JGregoryDPrattGWattsM, (Blackwell, Malden, MA) pp 625–626
97.
RaperJ F, 2005, “Spatial representation: The scientist's perspective”, in Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management and Applications Publishing2nd edition, Eds LongleyP AGoodchildM FMaguireD JRhindD W, (John Wiley, New York) pp 61–70
98.
RortyR, 1979Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
99.
RortyR, 2005, “Deconstruction”, in The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Volume 8: From Formalism to Poststructuralism Ed. SeldenR, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 166–196
100.
RoseM, 2004, “Reembracing metaphysics”Environment and Planning A36461–468
101.
St. MartinKWingJ, 2007, “The discourse and discipline of GIS”Cartographica42235–248
102.
SaldanhaA, 2006, “Reontologising race: The machinic geography of phenotype”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space249–24
103.
SamersM, 2001, “What is the point of economic geography?”Antipode33183–193
104.
SayerA, 1985, “Realism in geography”, in The Future of Geography Ed. JohnstonR J, (Methuen, New York) pp 159–173
105.
SayerA, 1992Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach2nd edition (Routledge, New York)
106.
SayerA, 1993, “Postmodernist thoughts in geography: A realist view”Antipode25320–344
107.
SchuurmanN, 2000, “Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s”Progress in Human Geography24569–590
108.
SchuurmanN, 2002a, “Reconciling social constructivism and realism in GIS”ACME173–90
109.
SchuurmanN, 2002b, “Women and technology in geography: A cyborg manifesto for GIS”The Canadian Geographer46258–265
110.
SchuurmanN, 2005, “Social perspectives on semantic interoperability: Constraints on geographical knowledge from a data perspective”Cartographica4047–61
111.
SchuurmanN, 2006, “Why formalization matters: Critical GIS and ontology research”Annals of the Association of American Geographers96726–739
112.
SchuurmanNLeszczynskiA, 2006, “Ontology-based metadata”Transactions in GIS10709–726
113.
SchuurmanNPrattG, 2002, “Care of the subject: Feminism and critiques of GIS”Gender, Place and Culture9291–299
114.
ScollonR, 2003, “The dialogist in a positivist world: Theory in the social sciences and the humanities at the end of the twentieth century”Social Semiotics1371–88
115.
SheppardE, 1995, “GIS and society: Towards a research agenda”Cartographica225–16
116.
SheppardE, 2000, “Quantitative geography: Representations, practices, and possibilities”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19535–554
117.
SheppardE, 2005, “Knowledge production through critical GIS: Genealogy and prospects”Cartographica405–21
118.
SieberR, 2007, “Spatial data access by the grassroots”Cartography and Geographic Information Science3447–62
119.
SismondoSChrismanN, 2001, “Deflationary metaphysics and the natures of maps”Philosophy of Science68S35–S49
120.
SmithB, 2003, “Ontology”, in Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information Ed. FloridiL, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 155–166
121.
SmithN, 1992, “Real wars, theory wars”Progress in Human Geography16257–271
122.
SmithN, 2005, “Neo-critical geography, or, the flat pluralist world of business class”Antipode37887–899
123.
SmithR G, 2003, “Baudrillard's nonrepresentational theory: Burn the signs and journey without maps”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2167–84
124.
StrohmayerU, 2003, “The culture of epistemology”, in Handbook of Cultural Geography Eds AndersonKDomoshMPileSThriftN, (Sage, Thousands Oaks, CA) pp 520–531
125.
SullivanP A, 1998, “An engineer dissects two case studies: Hayles on fluid mechanics and MacKenzie on statistics”, in A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science Ed. KoertgeN, (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 71–98
TaylorP J, 1991, “A distorted world of knowledge”Journal of Geography in Higher Education1585–90
128.
TaylorP JJohnsonR J, 1995, “GIS and geography”, in Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems Ed. PicklesJ, (Guilford Press, New York) pp 51–67
129.
ThriftN J, 1996Spatial Formations (Sage, London)
130.
TurnerA, 2006Introduction to Neogeography (O'Reilly, Sebastopol, CA)
131.
Van BouwelJ, 2005, “The division of labour in the social sciences versus the politics of metaphysics: Questioning critical realism's interdisciplinarity”Graduate Journal of Social Science232–39
132.
WilshireB, 1969Metaphysics: An Introduction to Philosophy (Pegasus, New York)
133.
WrightDGoodchildM FProctorJ D, 1997, “GIS: Tool or science? Demystifying the persistent ambiguity of GIS as ‘tool’ versus ‘science’”Annals of the Association of American Geographers87346–362
134.
YeungH W-C, 1997, “Critical realism and realist research in human geography: A method or a philosophy in search of a method?”Progress in Human Geography2151–74
