This paper explores debates over the statistical picturing of the nation's finite forest resources in the Progressive-era United States. This picturing was made possible by a variety of new quantitative and graphical practices that made maps and statistics appear as objective evidence of the natural limits those objects appeared to exhibit. Drawing on the work of Timothy Mitchell, I argue that this appearance was generated through more generalized practices of enframing. Enframing involved the systematic ordering of objects to create the appearance of a world metaphysically divided in two and graspable in terms of the distinction between reality and the objective representations through which reality as such was made to appear. This binary ordering, or enframing, of appearance created the appearance of order itself as an apparently abstract framework within which the objects so enframed could be more closely regulated. Enframing the forest quantitatively transformed heterogeneous forests into an apparently calculable quantity available to new disciplinary forms of state power that Foucault argues are characteristic of modern governmentality. The timber-famine debate also highlights the question of trust and the dependence of expert authority on traditional gender and class differences, which were themselves reworked through the quantifying practices of scientific forest conservation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonM J, 1988The American Census: A Social History (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
2.
Anonymous, 1875, “Notice of Walker's Statistical Atlas of the United State?American Journal of Science and Arts, Third Series9 (January) 74–75
BarnesT J, 1996Logics of Dislocation: Models, Metaphors, and Meanings of Economic Space (Guilford, New York)
10.
BarnesT J, 1998, “A history of regression: Actors, networks, machines, and numbers”Environment and Planning A30203–223
11.
BassJ P, 1901, “The lumber supply”Bangor Daily Commercial 2 January, page 4, quoting The New York Times
12.
BraunB, 2000, “Producing ‘vertical’ territory: Geology and governmentality in late-Victorian Canada”Ecumene77–46
13.
BrewerW H, 1874, “The woodland and forest systems of the United States”, in A Statistical Atlas of the United States, Based on Results of the Ninth Census Ed. WalkerF A (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
14.
Buck-MorssS, 1995, “Envisioning capital: Political economy on display”Critical Inquiry21434–467
15.
CannonS F, 1978Science in Culture: The Early Victorian Period (Science History Publications, New York)
16.
CaryA, 1894, “On the growth of spruce”Report of the Maine Forest Commissioner220–36
17.
CaryA, 1895, unpublished letter to Bernhard Fernow, dated 10 July, Record Group 95, USFS correspondence with Austin Cary, US National Archives, Washington, DC
18.
CaryA, 1896a, “The forests of Maine”Paper Trade Journal25364–365
19.
CaryA, 1896b, “Spruce on the Kennebec and Androscoggin Rivers”Report of the Maine Forest Commissioner315–203
20.
CaryA, 1899, unpublished letter to Gifford Pinchot, dated 30 March, Record Group 95, USFS correspondence with Austin Cary, US National Archives, Washington, DC
21.
ClaryD, 1986Timber and the Forest Service (University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS)
22.
DastonL, 1992, “Objectivity and the escape from perspective”Social Studies of Science22597–618
23.
DastonLGalisonP, 1992, “The image of objectivity”Representations4081–128
24.
DearP, 1992, “From truth to disinterestedness in the seventeenth century”Social Studies of Science22619–631
25.
DefebaughJ E, 1906History of the Lumber Industry of America (American Lumberman, Chicago, IL)
26.
DemerittD, 1998, “Science, social constructivism, and nature”, in Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium Eds BraunBCastreeN (Routledge, New York) pp 177–197
27.
DemerittD, 2001, “The construction of global warming and the politics of science”Annals of the Association of American Geographers91307–337
28.
DesrosieresA, 1998The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning translated by NaishC (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
29.
DeweyJ, 1984The Later Works Ed. BoydstonJ A (Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL)
30.
DixonD PJonesJ PIII, 1996, “For a supercalifragilisticexpialidocious scientific geography”Annals of the Association of American Geographers86767–779
31.
DixonD PJonesJ PIII, 1998, “My dinner with Derrida, or spatial analysis and poststructuralism do lunch”Environment and Planning A30247–260
32.
DuncanJLeyL, 1993, “Introduction: Representing the place of culture”, in Place/Culture/Representation Eds DuncanJLeyD (Routledge, New York) pp 1–21
33.
FickenR E, 1982, “Gifford Pinchot men: Pacific Northwest lumbermen and the conservation movement, 1902–1910”Western Historical Quarterly13165–178
34.
Forestry and Irrigation19039203
35.
FoucaultM, 1979Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison translated by SheridanA (Random House, New York)
36.
FoucaultM, 1990The History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction translated by HurleyR (Random House, New York)
37.
FoucaultM, 1991, “Governmentality”, in The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality Eds BurchallGGordonCMillerP (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 87–104
38.
FunkhouserH G, 1938, “Historical development of the graphical representation of statistical data”Osiris3269–404
39.
GreeleyW B1925, “The relation of geography to timber supply”Economic Geography11–14
40.
GroveR H, 1995Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens, and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860 (Cambridge University Press, New York)
41.
HallG S, 1879, “The graphic method”The Nation29238–239
42.
HannahM, 2000Governmentality and the Mastery of Territory in Nineteenth Century America (Cambridge University Press, New York)
43.
HanzlikE J, 1922, “Determination of the annual cut on a sustained basis for American virgin forests”Journal of Forestry20611–625
44.
HardingS, 1986The Science Question in Feminism (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
45.
HarleyJ B, 1989, “Deconstructing the map”Cartographica261–20
46.
HarveyD, 1969Explanation in Geography (Edward Arnold, London)
47.
HaysS P, 1959Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890–1920 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
48.
HeideggerM, 1977, “The age of world picture”, in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays translated by LovittW (Harper and Row, New York) pp 115–154
49.
HirstP W, 1994A Conspiracy of Optimism: Management of National Forests Since World War Two (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE)
50.
HorkheimerMAdornoT, 1972Dialectic of Enlightenment translated by CummingJ (Herder and Herder, New York)
51.
HosmerR S, 1902, “A study of the Maine spruce”, in Annual Report4 Maine Forest Commissioner, Augusta, ME, pp 65–108
52.
HoughB F, 1874, “On the duty of governments in the preservation of forests”Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science12B1–B10
53.
HoughB F, 1878–84Report Upon Forestry (Government Printing Office, Washington, DC) four volumes
54.
JohnstonR J J, 1991Geography and Geographers: Anglo – American Human Geography since 19454th edition (Arnold, London)
55.
JonesJ PIII, 1995, “Making geography objectively: Ocularity, representation, and the nature of geography”, in Objectivity and Its Other Eds NatterWSchatzkiT RJonesJ PIII (Guilford, New York) pp 67–92
56.
KellerE F, 1985Reflections on Gender and Science (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
57.
LangstonN, 1995Forest Dreams, Forest Nightmares: The Paradox of Old Growth in the Inland West (University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA)
58.
LatourB, 1987Science in Action (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
59.
LatourB, 1993We Have Never Been Modern, translated by PorterC (Harvester, London)
60.
LatourBWoolgarS, 1979Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Sage, London)
61.
Maine Forest Commissioner, 1902Annual ReportMaine Forest Commissioner, Augusta, ME
62.
MaloneJ J, 1964Pine Trees and Politics: The Naval Stores and Forest Policy in Colonial New England, 1691–1775 (University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA)
63.
MarshG P, 1965Man and Nature, or Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action Ed. LowenthalD (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
64.
MegillA, 1992, “Introduction: Four senses of objectivity”Annals of Scholarship8301–320
65.
MitchellT, 1991Colonising Egypt (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
66.
MitchellT, 1995, “The object of development”, in Power of Development Ed. CrushJ (Routledge, New York) pp 129–157
67.
MunroeJ P, 1923A Life of Francis A Walker (Henry Hold, New York)
68.
New York Lumber Trade Journal1886, 15 July
69.
New York Lumber Trade Journal1887, “Forest area”, 1 January
70.
OakC, 1907, unpublished letter to Austin Cary, dated 28 January, Box 603, Austin Cary Papers, University of Maine Library, Orono, ME
71.
ParryT BVauxH JDennisN, 1983, “Changing conceptions of sustained-yield policy on the national forests”Journal of Forestry81150–154
72.
PeetR, 1998Modern Geographical Thought (Blackwell, Oxford)
73.
PinchotG, 1898The Adirondack Spruce: A Study of the Forest in Ne-Ha-Sa-Ne Park (Circle Club, New York)
74.
PinchotG, 1900, “A primer of forestry”, US Forestry Service bulletin 24 (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
75.
PinchotG, 1910The Fight for Conservation (Doubleday, Page, New York)
76.
PinchotG, 1917The Training of a Forester3rd edition (J B Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA)
77.
PinkettH T, 1970Gifford Pinchot: Private and Public Forester (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL)
78.
PisaniD J, 1985, “Forests and conservation”Journal of American History72340–359
79.
PooveyM, 1998A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
80.
PorterC M, 1986The Eagle's Nest: Natural History and American Ideas, 1812–1842 (University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL)
81.
PorterT M, 1986The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820–1900 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
82.
PorterT M, 1994, “Making things quantitative”Science in Context7389–407
83.
PorterT M, 1995Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
84.
RajalaR A, 1998Clearcutting the Pacific Rain Forest: Production, Science, and Regulation (UBC Press, Vancouver)
85.
RecknagelA GBentleyJ, 1919Forest Management (John Wiley, New York)
86.
RichardsT, 1993The Imperial Archive: Knowledge and the Fantasy of Empire (Verso, London)
87.
RobbinsW G, 1987, “Lumber production and community stability: A view from the Pacific Northwest”Journal of Forest31187–196
88.
RobbinsW G, 1988Hard Times in Paradise: Coos Bay, Oregon, 1850–1986 (University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA)
89.
RobinsonA HWallisH M, 1967, “Humboldt's map of isothermal lines: A milestone in thematic cartography”Cartographic Journal5119–123
90.
RodgersA DIII, 1951Berhard Eduard Fernow: A Story of North American Forestry (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
91.
RortyR, 1991Objectivity, Relativism, Truth (Cambridge University Press, New York)
92.
RoseG, 1993Feminism and Geography (Minnesota University Press, Minneapolis, MN)
93.
SargentC S, 1882, “The protection of forests”North American Review135386–401
94.
SargentC S, 1884Report on the Forests of North America, Volume 9 of the Tenth Census of the United States (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
95.
ScottJ C, 1998Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT)
96.
ShapinS, 1994A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-century England (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
97.
SloanG, 1945Report of the Commissioner Relating to the Forest Resources of British Columbia (Charles F Banfield, Victoria, BC)
98.
SteenH K (Ed.), 1990David M Smith and the History of Silviculture: An Interview by Harold K Steen (Forest History Society, Durham, NQ
99.
StaffordB, 1994Artful Science: Enlightenment, Entertainment, and the Eclipse of Visual Education (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
100.
StarrF, 1865, “American forests: Their destruction and preservation”, in ReportUS Department of Agriculture (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC) pp 210–234
101.
TaylorP J, 1976, “An interpretation of the quantitative debate in British geography”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series1129–142
102.
TaylorP JButtelF H, 1992, “How do we know we have global environmental problems? Science and the globalization of environmental discourse”Geoforum23405–416
103.
TufteE, 1983Visual Display of Quantitative Information (Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT)
104.
USFS, 1887Annual ReportUS Forestry Service (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
105.
USFS, 1920Timber Sale Policy of the US Forest ServiceUS Forestry Service (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
106.
US Secretary of Interior, 1872, Letter from the Secretary of Interior to Congress, 5 July 1872, House ex doc 9 [42–3], serial set 1563 (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
107.
WalkerF A (Ed.), 1874A Statistical Atlas of the United States, Based on Results of the Ninth Census 1870: With Contributions from Many Eminent Men of Science and Several Departments of the Government (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC)
108.
WalkerF A, 1899Discussions in Economics and Statistics Ed. DavisD R (Augustus M Kelley, New York)
109.
WHB, 1875, “Walker's Statistical Atlas of the United State?American Journal of Science and Arts, Third Series10 (December) 83–88
110.
WhiteR, 1995, “Are you an environmentalist or do you work for a living?': Work and nature”, in Uncommon Ground: Toward Reinventing Nature Ed. CrononW (W W Norton, New York) pp 171–185
111.
WilliamsM, 1989Americans and Their Forests: A Historical Geography (Cambridge University Press, New York)
