The development of stable markets in ecosystem services is now a major neoliberal policy initiative in the United States and elsewhere. Such markets, however, require ecosystem scientists to play a new and challenging role in certifying the value of the commodities traded, which are defined using the holistic measures of ecology rather than the uncontroversial measures of weight, volume, or time. As ecosystem science increasingly serves as a metrical technology for the commodification of ecosystem services, its fine and fragile distinctions increasingly bear the weight of capital circulation. In this paper I report on fieldwork among ecosystem assessment technicians, and suggest that this new round of the commodification of nature may overwhelm the capacity of science to provide stable representations of commodity value. The methods and techniques of ecosystem assessment must describe a nature that capital can ‘see’—that has an uncontroversial measure—in order for trade to occur. However, these assessment methods currently produce unstable data that are rendered meaningful in economic terms only by dint of creative and ad hoc efforts at translation by field technicians. It is suggested that this may represent a practical limit or crisis point in the expansion of capital relations, or at least a complication in the streamlined neoliberal narratives about the commodification of ecosystem services.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamusP RStockwellL TClairainE JJrMorrowM ERozasL PSmithR D, 1991Wetland Evaluation Technique (WET); Volume 1: Literature Review and Evaluation RationaleUS Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS.
2.
BatieS SShabmanL A, 1982, “Estimating the economic value of wetlands: Principles, methods, and limitations”Coastal Zone Management Journal10255–278.
3.
BestB, 1999, “Postcolonialism and the deconstructive scenario: Representing Gayatri Spivak”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17475–494.
4.
BridgeGJonasAEG, 2002, “Governing nature: The reregulation of resource access, production, and consumption”Environment and Planning A34759–766.
5.
BrinsonM M, 1988, “Strategies for assessing the cumulative effects of wetland alteration on water quality”Environmental Management12655–662.
6.
BrinsonM M, 1996, “Assessing wetland functions using HGM”National Wetlands Newsletter January–February, pp 10–21.
BrumbaughR WReppertR, 1994National Wetland Mitigation Banking Study: First Phase ReportUS Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources, Alexandria, VA.
9.
CallariARuccioD F, 1996, “Introduction: Postmodern materialism and the future of Marxist theory”, in Postmodern Materialism and the Future of Marxist Theory: Essays in the Althusserian Tradition Eds CallariARuccioD F (Wesleyan University Press, Hanover, MA) pp 1–48.
10.
CastreeN, 2002, “False antitheses? Marxism, nature and actor-networks”Antipode34111–146.
11.
CrononW, 1991Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West (W W Norton, New York).
12.
DailyG C, 1997, “Introduction: What are ecosystem services?”, in Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems Ed. DailyG C (Island Press, Washington, DC) pp 1–10.
13.
DailyG CEllisonK, 2002The New Economy of Nature: The Quest to Make Conservation Profitable (Island Press, Washington, DC).
14.
DemerittD, 2001, “Scientific forest conservation and the statistical picturing of nature's limits in the Progressive-era United States”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19431–459.
15.
Environmental Law Institute, 1993Wetland Mitigation Banking (Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC).
16.
Environmental Law Institute, 2002Banks and Fees: The Status of Off-site Wetland Mitigation in the United States (Island Press, Washington, DC).
17.
EspelandW N, 1998The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality, and Identity in the American Southwest (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
18.
FassettN C, 1976Spring Flora of Wisconsin: A Manual of Plants Growing Without Cultivation and Flowering Before June 154th edition (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI).
19.
GoldsteinP Z, 1999, “Functional ecosystems and biodiversity buzzwords”Conservation Biology13247–255.
20.
GramsciA, 1971Selections from the Prison Notebooks translated by QhoareGNSmith (International Publishers, New York).
KarrJ R, 1993, “Defining and assessing ecological integrity: Beyond water quality”Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry121521–1531.
26.
KieserM, 2002, “Developing markets to manage ecosystems”, paper presented at the 5th National Mitigation Banking Conference, Washington, DC; copy available from the Terrene Institute, http://www.terrene.org.
27.
LatourB, 1999Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA).
28.
LuhmannN, 1989Ecological Communication translated by BednarzJJr (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
29.
LuhmannN, 2002Theories of Distinction: Re-describing the Descriptions of Modernity Ed. RaschW (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
30.
LukeT W, 1999Capitalism, Democracy, and Ecology: Departing from Marx (University of Illinois Press, Chicago, IL).
31.
McAfeeK, 1999, “Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17133–154.
32.
McCarthyJPrudhamS, 2004, “Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism”Geoforum35275–283.
33.
MansfieldB, 2004, “Rules of privatization: Contradictions in neoliberal regulation of North Pacific fisheries”Annals of the Association of American Geographers94565–584.
34.
MarxK, 1976Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume 14th edition, translated by FowkesB (Penguin Books, New York).
35.
MillerC, 2001, “Hybrid management: Boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime”Science, Technology and Human Values26478–500.
36.
MitchellT, 1988Colonising Egypt (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
37.
National Research Council, 2001Compensating for Wetland Losses under the Clean Water Act (National Academy Press, Washington, DC).
38.
NesomG L, 1994, “Review of the taxonomy of Aster sensu lato (Asteraceae: Astereae), emphasizing the New World species”Phytologia77141–297.
39.
O'ConnorJ, 1994, “Is sustainable capitalism possible?”, in Is Capitalism Sustainable?: Political Economy and the Politics of Ecology Ed. O'ConnorM (Guilford Press, New York) pp 152–175.
40.
ParryB, 2004Trading the Genome: Investigating the Commodification of Bio-information (Columbia University Press, New York).
PeetRWattsM, 1996, “Liberation ecology: Development, sustainability, and environment in an age of market triumphalism”, in Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements Eds PeetRWattsM (Routledge, New York) pp 1–45.
43.
PolanyiK, 1944The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Beacon Press, Boston, MA).
44.
PorterT M, 1995Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
45.
RaschW, 2000Niklas Luhmann's Modernity: The Paradoxes of Differentiation (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
46.
RaschWKnodtE, 1994, “Systems theory and the system of theory”New German Critique613–7.
47.
ReedP B, 1988National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: National Summary Biological Report 88, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.
48.
RobertsonM M, 2004, “The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: Wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance”Geoforum35361–373.
49.
SayreN F, 2002Ranching, Endangered Species, and Urbanization in the Southwest: Species of Capital (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ).
ScodariPShabmanL A, 1995National Wetland Mitigation Banking Study: Commercial Wetland Mitigation Credit Markets: Theory and PracticeUS Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources, Alexandria, VA.
52.
ShabmanL A, 1985, “The contribution of economics to wetlands valuation and management”, paper presented at National Wetlands Assessment Symposium, Portland, ME; copy available from Association of State Wetlands Managers, Box 269, Berne, NY 12023.
53.
ShabmanL A, 1992, “Beyond mitigation banking: Fee-based permitting, wetlands credit markets and watershed restoration”, paper presented at Effective Mitigation: Mitigation Banks and Joint Projects in the Context of Wetlands Management Plans, Palm Beach Gardens, FL; copy available from Association of State Wetlands Managers, Box 269, Berne, NY 12023.
54.
ShabmanL AScodariPKingD, 1994National Wetland Mitigation Banking Study: Expanding Opportunities for Successful Mitigation: The Private Credit Market AlternativeUS Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources, Alexandria, VA.
55.
SmithN, 1990, Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space (Blackwell, Maiden, MA).
56.
SokoloveR D, 2001, “Multiple uses for wetland mitigation banks”, paper presented at the 4th National Mitigation Banking Conference, Fort Lauderdale, FL; copy available from Terrene Institute, http://.terrene.org.
57.
StarS LGriesemerJ R, 1999, “Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907–39”, in The Science Studies Reader Ed. BiagioliM (Routledge, New York) pp 503–524.
58.
SwinkFWilhelmG, 1979Plants of the Chicago Region: A Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Chicago Region, with Keys, Notes on Local Distribution, Ecology, and Taxonomy, and a System for Evaluation of Plant CommunitiesMorton Arboretum, Lisle, IL.
59.
US Army Corps of Engineers, 1998, “Chicago District mitigation requirements”, US Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago District, http://.Irc.usace.army.mil/co-r/mitgr.htm.
60.
VossE G, 1972Michigan Flora—A Guide to the Identification and Occurrence of the Native and Naturalized Seed-plants of the State. Volume 1: Monocots and Gymnosperms (Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, MI).
61.
VossE G, 1980Michigan Flora—A Guide to the Identification and Occurrence of the Native and Naturalized Seed-plants of the State. Volume 2: Dicots (Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, MI).
62.
VossE G, 1996Michigan Flora—A Guide to the Identification and Occurrence of the Native and Naturalized Seed-plants of the State. Volume 3: Dicots Concluded (Cranbrook Institute of Science, Bloomfield Hills, MI).
63.
WalkerR A, 2001, “California's golden road to riches: Natural resources and regional capitalism, 1848–1940”Annals of the Association of American Geographers91167–199.
64.
WatersS, 2002, “Issues in the economic appraisal of mitigation”, paper presented at the 5th National Mitigation Banking Conference, Washington, DC; copy available from the Terrene Institute, http://.terrene.org.
65.
Willems-BraunB, 1997, “Buried epistemologies: The politics of nature in (post)colonial British Columbia”Annals of the Association of American Geographers873–31.
