Cities are inhabited by all manner of things and made up of all manner of practices, many of which are unnoticed by urban politics and disregarded by science. In this paper we do two things. First, we add to the sense that urban living spaces involve much more than human worlds and are often prime sites for human and nonhuman ecologies. Second, we experiment with what is involved in taking these nonhuman worlds and ecologies seriously and in producing a politics for urban wilds. In order to do this we learn how to sense urban wildlife. In learning new engagements we also learn new things and in particular come to see urban wilds as matters of controversy. For this reason we have borrowed and adapted Latour's language to talk of wild things. Wild things become more rather than less real as people learn to engage with them. At the same time, wild things are too disputed, sociable, and uncertain to become constant objects upon which a stable urban politics can be constructed. So a parliament of wild things might be rather different from the house of representatives that we commonly imagine. It may be closer to what Stengers (1997, Power and Invention University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) has characterised as cosmopolitics, a politics that is worked out without recourse to old binaries of nature and society. Using empirical work with urban wildlife-trust members we muddy the clean lines of representational politics, and start to grapple with issues that a reconvened wild politics might involve.
BinghamN, 1996, “Object-ions from technological determinism towards geographies of relations”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space14635–657
3.
BowkerG, 2000, “Biodiversity datadiversity”Social Studies of science30643–683
4.
BraunBDischL, 2002, “Radical democracy's ‘modern Constitution’”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space20505–511
5.
CABE, 2003, “Wasted space”, Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London, available at http://www.wastedspace.org.uk/index.asp, accessed 8 October 2003
6.
CallonM, 2002, “Technology, politics and the market, an interview conducted by Andrew Barry and Don Slater”Economy and Society31285–306
7.
CrononW, 1996, The trouble with wilderness”, in Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature Ed. CrononW (W W Norton, New York) pp 69–96
Department of the Environment, 1994Biodiversity: The UK Action Plan Cmd 2428 (HMSO, London)
10.
EvansJ, 2003Biodiversity Conservation and Brownfield Sites: A Scalar Political Ecology unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
11.
FeatherstoneD, 2004, “Spatial relations and the materialities of political conflict: the construction of entangled political identities in the London and Newcastle Port Strikes of 1768”Geoforum35701–711
12.
FoucaultM, 1974Counter-memory Language, Practice (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
13.
GroszE, 1995Space, Time, and Perversion (Routledge, London)
14.
HarawayD, 1992, “Otherworldly conversations; terrain topics; local terms”Science as Culture3(1) 64–98
15.
HarawayD, 2003The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness (Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago, IL)
16.
HetheringtonKLeeN, 2000, “Social order and the blank figure”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18169–184
17.
HeywoodV (Ed.), 1995Global Biodiversity Assessment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
18.
HinchliffeS, 2001, “Indeterminacy in-decisions science, policy and politics in the BSE crisis”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series26182–204
19.
HinchliffeS, 2003, “Inhabiting—landscapes and natures”, in The Handbook of Cultural Geography Eds AndersonKDomoshMPileSThriftN (Sage, London) pp 207–226
20.
IngoldT, 2000The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill (Routledge, London)
21.
JNCC, 2002Fourth Quinquennial Review of Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act, 1981Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Monkstone House, City Road, Peterborough PE1 1JY
22.
KearnesM, 2003, “Geographies that matter—the rhetorical deployment of physicality”Social and Cultural Geography4(2) 139–152
23.
LatourB, 1992, “Where are the missing masses: sociology of a few mundane artefacts”, in Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnological Change Eds BijkerWLawJ (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 225–258
24.
LatourB, 1997, Foreword: Stenger's Shibboleth”, in Power and Invention: Situating Science Ed. StengersI (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp vii–xx
25.
LatourB, 1998, “To modernise or ecologise? That is the question”, in Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium Eds BraunBCastreeN (Routledge, London) pp 221–242
26.
LatourB, 1999aPandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
27.
LatourB, 1999b, “Ein ding ist ein thing—a philosophical platform for a left (European) party”Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culturenumber 12, 12–25
28.
LatourB, 2000, “When things strike back—a possible contribution of science studies to the social sciences”British Journal of Sociology51(1) 107–123
29.
LatourB, 2003aThe War of the Worlds: What About Peace? (Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago, IL)
30.
LatourB, 2003b, “What if we talked politics a little?”Contemporary Political Theory2143–164
31.
LatourB, 2004, “How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies”Body and Society10205–229
32.
LawJHassardJ (Eds), 1999Actor Network Theory and After (Blackwell, Oxford)
33.
LawJMolA-M, 2001, “Situating technoscience: an inquiry into spatialities”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19609–621
34.
LeeNBrownS, 1994, “Otherness and the actor network: the undiscovered continent”American Behavioural Scientist37772–790
35.
LynchMLawJ, 1990, “Lists, field guides, and the descriptive organization of seeing: birdwatching as an exemplary observational activity”, in Representation in Scientific Practice Eds LynchMWoolgarS (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 267–299
WhatmoreS, 2003, “Generating materials”, in Using Social Theory: Thinking Through Research Eds PrykeMRoseGWhatmoreS (Sage, London) pp 89–104
52.
WhatmoreSHinchliffeS, 2003, “Living cities: making space for urban nature”Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culturenumber 22, 137–150
53.
WolchJEmelJWilbertC, 2003, “Reanimating cultural geography”, in The Handbook of Cultural Geography Eds AndersonKDomoshMPileSThriftN (Sage, London) pp 184–206
54.
WolfeC, 1998Critical Environments (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
