Debates concerning the nature and extent of hospital provision in London, England are longstanding. Reviews in the 1990s have focused on a perceived over-provision and recommended rationalisation. This paper explores the representations of place which emerged in the discourses surrounding the possible closure of St Bartholomew's Hospital (Barts), London. Through a discourse analysis of official and unofficial reports, Parliamentary debates, press releases, campaign material and coverage in the London Evening Standard and other newspapers, we assess resistance to closure and the construction of communities dedicated to the retention of Barts. Four different representations of Bart's are identified: as community resource, as a site of expertise, as a heritage symbol and as a site pertinent to the identities of Londoners. The effectiveness of these different strategies is considered and their positioning and use within the ‘Campaign for Barts’ is evaluated. We conclude that, notwithstanding the potential to present the (possibly temporary) retention of Barts as a recognition of its status as a locus of particular medical expertise, the potency of this health care facility as a symbol both of London and of medical tradition was the crucial factor in its reprieve.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnesTDuncanJ, (Eds), 1992Writing Worlds: Discourse, Text and Metaphor in the Representation of Landscape (Routledge, London).
2.
Barts NHS Trust, 1992, “Briefing paper”, 6 November, Barts NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BA.
3.
Barts NHS Trust/Medical College, 1992a, “Briefing note”, 29 September, Barts NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BA.
4.
Barts NHS Trust/Medical College, 1992b, “International response to the proposed closure of St Bartholomew's Hospital at Smithfield as stated in the Tomlinson report”, Barts NHS Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BA.
5.
BoyleS, 1996, “Post-Tomlinson development in London: A description of changes in hospital services in the capital”Health and Place2(1) 51–58.
6.
ButtimerA, 1971Society and Mileu in the French Geographic Tradition (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL).
7.
CookeP, 1986, “The changing urban and regional system in the United Kingdom”Regional Studies30243–251.
8.
CookeP, 1989Localities (Unwin Hyman, London).
9.
CosgroveD, 1989, “Geography is everywhere: Culture and symbolism in human landscapes”, in Horizons in Human Geography Eds GregoryDWalfordR, (Macmillan, London) pp 118–135.
10.
DayGMurdochJ, 1993, “Locality and community: Coming to terms with place”The Sociological Review41(1) 82–111.
11.
DearM, 1991, “The premature demise of postmodern urbanism”Cultural Anthropology6538–552.
12.
DelamotheT, 1993, “The rescuers”British Medical Journal306 (30 January) 341–342.
13.
DoH, 1989Working for Patients Cm 555, Department of Health (HMSO, London).
14.
DoH, 1992Report of the Inquiry into London's Health Service, Medical Education and ResearchDepartment of Health, Chairman Sir Bernard Tomlinson (HMSO, London).
15.
DoH, 1993Making London BetterDepartment of Health, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall, London SW1A 2NL.
16.
DoH, 1998Health Services in London: A Strategic Review. The Turnberg ReviewsDepartment of Health, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall, London SW1A 2NL.
EntrikinJ, 1991The Betweenness of Place: Towards a Geography of Modernity (Macmillan, London).
19.
EylesJ, 1985Sense of Place (Silverbrook Press, Warrington, Cheshire).
20.
GeslerW, 1991The Cultural Geography of Health and Health Care (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA).
21.
GeslerW, 1992, “Therapeutic landscapes: Medical issues in light of the new cultural geography”Social Science and Medicine34735–746.
22.
HallS, 1980, “Cultural studies and the centre: Some problematics and problems” in Culture, Media, Language Eds HallSHobsonDLoweAWillisP, (Hutchinson, London) pp 15–47.
23.
HarveyD, 1989The Condition of Postmodernity (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).
24.
HarveyD, 1993, “From space to place and back again: Reflecting on the condition of postmodernity”, in Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change Eds BirdJCurtisBPutnamTRobertsonGTicknerL, (Routledge, London) pp 3–29.
25.
JacksonP, 1989Maps of Meaning (Unwin Hyman, London).
26.
JacksonP, 1991, “Mapping meanings: A cultural critique of locality studies”Environment and Planning A23215–228.
27.
KearnsR, 1993, “Towards a reformed medical geography”Professional Geographer45139–147.
28.
KearnsRBarnettR, 1997, “Consumerist ideology and the symbolic landscapes of private medicine”Health and Place3(3) 171–180.
29.
KearnsRGeslerW, (Eds), 1998Putting Health into Place: Landscape, Identity and Wellbeing (Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY).
30.
KeithMPileS, (Eds), 1993Place and the Politics of Identity (Routledge, London).
31.
King's Fund, 1992London Health Care 2010 (King's Fund, London).
LaclauEMouffeC, 1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards Radical Democratic Politics (Verso, London).
35.
London Health Care Planning Consortium, 1981Report of the Primary Health Care Study GroupDepartment of Health, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall, London SW1A 2NL.
36.
MasseyD, 1984Spatial Divisions of Labour (Macmillan, London).
37.
MasseyD, 1991, “The political place of loyality studies”Environment and Planning A23267–281.
38.
MasseyD, 1992, “Politics and space/time”New Left Reviewnumber 196, 67–84.
39.
MoonG, 1995, “(Replacing research on health and health care”Health and Place11–4.
40.
MoonGBrownT, 1998, “Place, space and health reform”, in Putting Health into Place: Landscape, Identity and Wellbeing Eds KearnsRGeslerW, (Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY) pp 270–288.
41.
MorleyD, 1991, “Where the global meets the local: Notes from the sitting room”Screen32(1) 1–15.
42.
NatterWJonesJ, 1997, “Identity, space and other uncertainties”, in Space and Social Theory: Interpreting Modernity and Postmodernity Eds BenkoGStrohmeyerU, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 141–161.
43.
ÓTuathailG, 1996Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
44.
PileSKeithM, 1997Geographies of Resistance (Routledge, London).
45.
PowellM, 1996, “A century of hospital planning in London: From the House of Lord's enquiry to the Tomlinson Report”London Journal21(2) 164–180.
46.
RivettG, 1986, “The development of the London hospital system”, King's Fund, London.
47.
RoseN, 1996, “The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government”Economy and Society25327–356.
48.
RobinsK, 1991, “Prisoners of the city: Whatever could a postmodern city be?”New Formations15 (Winter) 1–22.
49.
RoutledgeP, 1997, “The imagineering of resistance: Pollock Free State and the practice of postmodern politics”Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series22359–376.
50.
ShieldsR, 1991Places on the Margin: Alternative Geographies of Modernity (Routledge, London).
51.
ShieldsR, 1997, “Spatial stress and resistance: Social meanings of spatialization”, in Space and Social Theory: Interpreting Modernity and Postmodernity Eds BenkoGStrohmeyerU, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 186–202.
52.
SmithNKatzC, 1993, “Grounding metaphor: Towards a spatialized politics”, in Place and the Politics of Identity Eds KeithMPileS, (Routledge, London) pp 67–83.
53.
StewartL, 1995, “Bodies, visions, and spatial politics: A review essay on Henri Lefebvre's The Production of Space”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space13609–618.
54.
TuanY-F, 1977Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience (Edward Arnold, London).
55.
WardenJ, 1998, “St Bartholomew's saved in London plan”British Medical Journal316 (14 February) 496.
