Haptic devices for computers and video-game consoles aim to reproduce touch and to engage the user with ‘force feedback’. Although physical touch is often associated with proximity and intimacy, technologies of touch can reproduce such sensations over a distance, allowing intricate and detailed operations to be conducted through a network such as the Internet. The ‘virtual handshake’ between Boston and London in 2002 is given as an example. This paper is therefore a critical investigation into some technologies of touch, leading to observations about the sociospatial framework in which this technological touching takes place. Haptic devices have now become routinely included with video-game consoles, and have started to be used in computer-aided design and manufacture, medical simulation, and even the cybersex industry. The implications of these new technologies are enormous, as they remould the human–computer interface from being primarily audiovisual to being more truly multisensory, and thereby enhance the sense of ‘presence’ or immersion. But the main thrust of this paper is the development of ideas of presence over a large distance, and how this is enhanced by the sense of touch. By using the results of empirical research, including interviews with key figures in haptics research and engineering and personal experience of some of the haptic technologies available, I build up a picture of how ‘presence’, ‘copresence’, and ‘immersion’, themselves paradoxically intangible properties, are guiding the design, marketing, and application of haptic devices, and the engendering and engineering of a set of feelings of interacting with virtual objects, across a range of distances.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmatoI, 2001a, “Helping doctors feel better”Technology Review April, 64–71.
2.
AmatoI, 2001b, “Touchy subjects: From digital clay to the ‘nanoManipulator’”Technology Review April, 70–71.
3.
AppelbaumD, 1988The Interpenetrating Reality: Bringing the Body to Touch (Peter Lang, New York).
4.
ArthurC, 2002, “Touching moment 3,000 miles apart becomes a virtual reality”The Independent Home News, 30 October, page 7.
BenjaminW, 1999Illuminations translated by ZornH, Ed. ArendtH (Pimlico, London).
7.
BinghamN, 1996, “Object-ions: From technological determinism towards geographies of relationsEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space14635–657.
8.
BurdeaG C, 1996Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex).
9.
CooperR, 1992, “Formal organisation as representation: Remote control, displacement and abbreviation”, in Rethinking Organisation: New Directions in Organisational Theory and Analysis Eds ReedMHughesM (Sage, London) pp 254–272.
10.
DaniusS, 2002The Senses of Modernism: Technology, Perception and Aesthetics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).
11.
DenningG, 1996Performances (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).
12.
DionisioJHenrichVJakobURettigAZieglerR, 1997, “The virtual touch: Haptic interfaces in virtual environments”Computers and Graphics21459–468.
DowntonALeedhamG, 1991, “Human aspects of human–computer interaction”, in Engineering the Human–Computer Interface (McGraw-Hill, London) pp 13–26.
15.
DreyfusH, 2000, “Telepistemology: Descartes' last stand”, in The Robot in the Garden: Telerobotics and Telepistemology in the Age of the Internet (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 48–63.
16.
GržinicM, 2000, “Exposure time, the aura, and telerobotics”, in The Robot in the Garden: Telerobotics and Telepistemology in the Age of the Internet Ed. GoldbergK (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 215–224.
17.
HannafordB, 2000, “Feeling is believing: A history of telerobotics”, in The Robot in the Garden: Telerobotics and Telepistemology in the Age of the Internet Ed. GoldbergK (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 246–275.
18.
HaylesN K, 1993, “Virtual bodies and flickering signifiers”October6669–91.
19.
HillisK, 1999Digital Sensations: Space, Identity and Embodiment in Virtual Reality (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MA).
20.
HodgesM, 1998, “It just feels right”Computer Graphics World2148–56.
KimJKimHTayB KMuniyandiMSrinivasanM AJordanJMortensenJOliveiraMSlaterM, 2004, “Transatlantic touch: A study of haptic collaboration over long distance”Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments13328–337.
28.
KittlerF A, 1999Gramophone, Film, Typewriter translated by YoungG W (Standford University Press, Stanford, CA).
29.
LathamA, 1999, “The power of distraction: Distraction, tactility, and habit in the work of Walter Benjamin”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17451–473.
30.
LathamAMcCormackD M, 2004, “Moving cities: Rethinking the materialities of urban geography”Progress in Human Geography28701–724.
31.
LaurierE, 2001, “Why people say where they are during mobile phone calls”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19485–504.
32.
LaurierEPhiloC, 2003, “The region in the boot: Mobilising lone subjects and multiple objects”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space2185–106.
33.
LawJ, 1986, “On the methods of long distance control: Vessels, navigation and the Portuguese route to India”, in Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Ed. LawJ (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London) pp 234–263.
34.
LawJMolA, 2001, “Situating technoscience: An inquiry into spatialities”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19609–621.
35.
McCulloughM, 1998Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
36.
MacLeanK ERoderickJ B, 1999, “Smart tangible displays in the everyday world: A haptic door knob”Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM '99), September 1999, Atlanta GA, http://www.cs.ubc/ca/∼maclean/publics/aim99–HapticDoorknob.PDF.
ManovichL, 2001The Language of New Media (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
41.
MassieTSalisburyK, 1994, “The PHANToM haptic interface: A device for probing virtual objects”Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Dynamic Systems and Control, Chicago volume 55, DSC, pp 295–301, http://www.sensable.com/products/datafiles/phantom_ghost/ASME94.pdf.
42.
Merleau-PontyM, 1992The Phenomenology of Perception translated by SmithC (Routledge, London).
MurphieA, 2002, “Putting the virtual back into VR”, in A Shock to Thought: Expression After Deleuze and Guattari Ed. MassumiB (Routledge, London) pp 188–214.
45.
NoyesJMillsS, 1999, “Virtual reality”, in Interface Technology: The Leading Edge Eds NoyesJ MCookM (Research Studies Press, Baldock, Herts) pp 123–133.
46.
OakleyIMcGeeM RBrewsterSGrayP, 2000, “Putting the feel in ‘look and feel’”, in Transactions of ACM Computer–Human Interaction 2000 (ACM Press, The Hague) pp 415–422.
47.
PatersonMWD, 2002Haptic Spaces doctoral thesis, School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol.
48.
PatersonMWD, 2005, “Digital touch”, in The Book of Touch (Sensory Formations) Ed. ClassenC (Berg, Oxford) pp 431–437.
49.
PatersonMWD, 2006, “Digital scratch and virtual sniff: Articulating a language of smell through iSmell”, in The Smell Culture (Reader) Ed. DrobnickJ (Berg, Oxford) in press.
50.
PatersonMWD, 2007, “Digital craft, digital touch: Haptics and design”, in Emerging Small Tech: Technologies at the Intersection of Cyber culture and New Media Eds HawkBRiederDOviedoO (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) forthcoming.
ShillitoA MPaynterKWallSWrightM, 2001, “‘Tacitus’ project: Identifying multi-sensory perceptions in creative 3D practice for development of a haptic computing system for applied artists”Digital Creativity12 (1) 195–204.
57.
SrinivasanM ABasdoganC, 1997, “Haptics in virtual environments: Taxonomy, research status, and challenges”Computers and Graphics21393–404.
58.
StoneR, 2000, “Haptic feedback: A potted history from telepresence to virtual reality”, in Proceedings of First International Workshop on Haptic Human–Computer Interaction, Glasgow Eds BrewsterSMurray-SmithR (Springer, Berlin) pp 1–7, http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/∼stephen/workshops/haptic/papers/stone.pdf.
59.
SudnowD, 1993The Ways of the Hand: The Organisation of Improvised Conduct (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
60.
SutherlandI E, 1965, “The ultimate display”Proceedings of the International Federation of Information Processing Congress number 2, 506–508.
61.
TaussigM, 1993Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses (Routledge, London).
62.
ThriftN, 2000, “Afterwords”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space18213–255.
63.
ThriftN J, 2004, “Summoning life”, in Envisioning Human Geographies Eds ClokePCrangPGodwinM (Arnold, London) pp 81–103.
YelistratovVStraussWFleischmannM, 1999, “Two approaches for intuitive navigation in virtual environments”, in Proceedings of Graphicon 99, 9th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Vision, Moscow, http://www.bi.fraunhofer.de/publications/report/0080/Text.pdf.
