This paper offers a critical analysis of the role of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that deal with planning policy in general and in Israel in particular. The inherent dilemmas of the different NGOs' tactics and strategies in reshaping the public sphere are examined, based on a critical reading of Habermas's conceptualization of the public sphere. The main objective of this paper is to investigate to what extent, and under which conditions, the NGOization of space—that is, the growing number of nongovernmental actors that deal with the production of space both politically and tangibly—has been able to achieve strategic goals which may lead towards social change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlfasiN, 2003, “Is public participation making urban planning more democratic? The Israeli experience”Planning Theory and Practice4185–202
2.
AlnoorE, 2003NGOs and Organizational Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
3.
BerkeP REricksenNCrawfordJDixonJ, 2002, “Planning and indigenous people”Journal of Planning Education and Research22115–134
4.
FensterT, 1996, “Ethnicity and citizen identity in planning and development for minority groups”Political Geography15405–418
5.
ForesterJ, 1989Planning in the Face of Power (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
6.
FormanJKedarS, 2004, “From Arab land to ‘Israel Lands’: The legal dispossession of the Palestinians displaced by Israel in the wake of 1948”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22809–830
7.
FraserN, 1992, “Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy”, in Habermas and the Public Sphere Ed. CalhounC, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 109–142
8.
FraserN, 2000, “Rethinking recognition”New Left Reviewnumber 3, 107–120
9.
GeussR, 1981The Idea of a Critical Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
10.
GordonN, 2008, “Human rights, social space and power: Why do some NGOs exert more influence than others?”International Journal of Human Rights12(2) forthcoming
11.
HabermasJ, 1989The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Polity Press, Cambridge)
12.
HallS, 1996, “New ethnicities”, in Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies Eds MorleyDChenK-H, (Routledge, London) pp 441–449
13.
HarveyD, 2005A Brief History of Neoliberalis (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
14.
HastingsA, 1999, “Discourse and urban change: Introduction to the special issue”Urban Studies36 (1) 7–12
15.
HauserG A, 1999Vernacular Voices: The Rhetoric of Publics and Public Spheres (University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC)
16.
HealeyP, 1996, “The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formations”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design23217–234
17.
HealeyP, 1997Collaborative Planning: Making Frameworks in Fragmented Societies (Macmillan, London)
18.
KedarS, 1998, “Majority time, minority time: Land, nation and the law of adverse possession in Israel”Iyyuney Mishpat21665–746 (in Hebrew)
19.
KimmerlingB, 2001The Invention and Decline of Israeliness (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
20.
LefebvreH, 1991The Production of Space (Blackwell, Oxford)
21.
MarcuseP, 1995, “Not chaos, but walls: Postmodernism and the partitioned city”, in Postmodern Cities and Space Eds WatsonSGibsonK, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 243–253
22.
MarkusTCameronD, 2002The Words Between the Spaces: Buildings and Language (Routledge, London)
23.
MartensK, 2005, “Participatory experiments from the bottom up: The role of environmental NGOs and citizen groups”European Journal of Spatial Development81–20
24.
MitchellD, 2003The Right to the City (Guilford Press, New York)
25.
MoserC, 1993Gender Planning and Development (Routledge, London)
26.
OphirA, 2002, “The place of ethics”Ethics in Planning: Dilemmas, Positions, ConflictsBimkom, Jerusalem, pp 14–23 (in Hebrew)
27.
OttoD, 1996, “Nongovernmental organizations in the United Nations system: The emerging role of international civil society”Human Rights Quarterly18107–141
28.
PENGON, 2003The Wall in PalestineThe Palestinian Environmental NGOs Network, PO Box 25220, Beit Hanina, Jerusalem
29.
QadeerA, 1997, “Pluralistic planning for multicultural cities: The Canadian practice”Journal of the American Planning Association63481–494
30.
RoyA, 2006, “Praxis in the time of empire”Planning Theory5 (1) 7–29
31.
SagieUSherG, 2003Draft for Public DebateVan Leer Institute, Jerusalem
StasiulisDYuval-DavisN, 1995, “Introduction: Beyond dichotomies—gender, race, ethnicity and class in settler societies”, in Unsettling Settler Societies Eds StasiulisDYuval-DavisN, (Sage, London) pp 1–38
36.
ThornleyARydinY, (Eds), 2003Planning in a Global Era (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
37.
TzfadiaE, 2005, “Academic discourse on making new towns in Israel: Three approaches in social science”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy23475–491
World Bank, 2003The Impact of the Israel's Separation Barrier on Affected West Bank Communities (World Bank, Washington, DC)
40.
YacobiHTzfadiaE, 2004, “On the construction of territorial identity: Nationalism and space among migrants in Lod”Teorya u-Bikoret2445–71 (in Hebrew)
41.
YiftachelO, 1998, “Planning and social control: Exploring the dark side”Journal of Planning Literature12395–406
42.
YiftachelO, 1999, “‘Ethnocracy’: The politics of Judaizing Israel/Palestine”Constellations6364–391
43.
YiftachelOKedarS, 2000, “Landed power: The making of the Israeli land regime”Theory and Criticisms16 (Van Leer Institute Jerusalem) 67–100 (in Hebrew)
44.
YiftachelOYacobiH, 2004, “Urban ethnocracy: Ethnicization and the production of space in an Israeli ‘mixed city’”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space21673–693
45.
YiftachelOYacobiH, 2005, “Walls, fences and ‘creeping apartheid’ in Israel/Palestine”, in Against the Wall Ed. SorkinM, (Greenwood Press, New York) pp 673–693
46.
YoungM I, 1990Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
