Drawing on Jasanoff's concept of coproduction [2004 States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order (Routledge, London) and Ong's notion of ‘graduated’ sovereignty [2000 Theory, Culture and Society17(4) 55–75], we analyse Singapore's promotion of the biomedical industry. To secure its place in the knowledge-based economy, Singapore's developmental state is determined to change the mind-set of its population and inculcate the individual creativity and entrepreneurialism needed for scientific innovation. It is also rolling out an internationally accepted framework of bioethics regulation. We explore the liberal values implicit in these two projects for promoting biomedicine and their implications both for the civic norms of Singapore's developmental state and for the wider relationships between science and liberal democracy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AglionbyJ, 2002, “Singapore's fine culture keeps people in line”The Guardian 2 November, page 7
2.
AngIStrattonJ, 1995, “The Singapore way to multiculturalism: Western concepts/Asian cultures”SOJOURN10 (1) 65–69
3.
BAC, 2004Research Involving Human Subjects: Guidelines for Institutional Review Boards (Bioethics Advisory Committee, Singapore)
4.
BraunB, 2007, “The biopolitics of molecular geographies”Cultural Geographies14 (1) 6–28
5.
British Medical Journal, 1996, “Nuremberg Code”3131448
6.
CastellsM, 1992, “Four Asian Tigers with a dragon head: A comparative analysis of the state, economy, and society in the Asian Pacific Rim”, in States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim Eds HendersonJAppelbaumR P, (Sage, London) pp 33–70
7.
ChuaB H, 1998, “Asian values: Restraining the logic of capitalism?”Social Semiotics8(2/3) 215–226
8.
CoeN MKellyP F, 2002, “Languages of labour: Representional strategies in Singapore's labour control regime”Political Geography21341–371
9.
DyerS, 2005Applying Bioethics: Local Research Ethics Committees and the Ethical Regulation of Medical Research PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, King's College London
10.
EzrahiY, 1990The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
11.
Financial Times2004, “MPS is not against doctors working in Singapore”, 27 July, page 16
12.
FoucaultM, 1976History of Sexuality: Volume 1 (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
13.
FranklinS, 2000, “Life itself: Global nature and the genetic imaginary”, in Global Nature, Global Culture Eds FranklinSLuryCStacyJ, (Sage, London) pp 188–227
14.
FranklinSLockM, (Eds), 2003Remaking Life and Death: Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences (James Currey, Oxford)
HoK CBaberZKhondkerH, 2002, “‘Sites’ of resistance: Alternative websites and state–society relations”British Journal of Sociology53 (1) 127–148
17.
JasanoffS, 2004, “The idiom of co-production”, in States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order Ed. JasanoffS, (Routledge, London) pp 1–13
18.
JasanoffS, 2005Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
19.
JasanoffS, 2006, “Biotechnology and empire: The global power of seeds and science”Osiris21273–292
20.
LatourB, 2004Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy translated by PorterC, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
21.
LeachMScoonesI, 2005, “Science and citizenship in a global context”, in Science and Citizenship Eds LeachMScoonesIWynneB, (Zed Books, New York) pp 15–38
MTI2002aReport of the Economic Review Committee Sub-Committee on Enhancing Human Capital: Realising Our Human Potential. Executive Summary.
25.
MTI2002bReport of the Entrepreneur ship and Internationalisation Subcommittee Economic Review Committee.
26.
MTI2006Science and Technology Plan 2010.
27.
OldsKThriftN, 2005, “Cultures on the brink: Reengineering the soul of capitalism”, in Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems Eds OngACollierS J, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 270–290
28.
OngA, 2000, “Graduated sovereignty in South-East Asia”Theory, Culture and Society17 (4) 55–75
29.
OngA, 2004, “The Chinese axis: Zoning technologies and variegated sovereignty”Journal of East Asian Studies469–96
30.
OngA, 2005, “Ecologies of expertise: Assembling flows, managing citizenship”, in Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems Eds OngACollierS J, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 337–353
31.
PerryMKongLYeohB, 1997, “Global processes and a developmental city state”, in Singapore: A Developmental City State Eds PerryMKongLYeohB, (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex) pp 1–24
32.
PillerC, 2004, “A candy store for scientists”Los Angeles Times 9 December, page A1
33.
RoseN, 2001, “The politics of life itself”Theory, Culture and Society18 (6) 1–30
34.
RoseNNovasC, 2005, “Biological citizenship”, in Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems Eds OngACollierS J, (Blackwell, Oxford) pp 439–463
ThompsonM R, 1996, “Late industrialisers, late democratisers: Developmental states in the Asia Pacific”Third World Quarterly17625–647
43.
TomlinsonH, 2004, “Singapore sweetens the pills: Formula that lures British scientists: No animal rights protests, minimal red tape and ample cash incentives”The Guardian 26 August, page 30
44.
WilsdonJWillisR, 2004, See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream (Demos, London)
