This paper explores some of the inequities in the ways in which intellectual property has been applied to agricultural plant genetic resources, focusing primarily on patents. In particular, it is concerned with the importance of what counts as ‘nature’ in making the distinction between something that is ‘invented’ and something that is merely ‘discovered’—a distinction that is at the heart of patent law (although not always made in these terms). While discoveries are understood to be mere revealings of nature, genuine inventions are considered to be human products, and therefore eligible for patent protection. What counts as nature in this discourse, and which kinds of human labour are taken to be genuinely inventive, is, therefore, a highly consequential issue. Ultimately, I argue for both the exposure of the noninnocent and highly political way in which ‘nature’ is formed, and the importance of more honest ways of characterising the coming-into-being of new plant varieties. The final section points to some existing proposals and projects that might help us to build systems of property in this area that are both more equitable and that acknowledge the contributions and needs of all of the diverse actors—human and not—involved in the ‘emergence’ of agricultural biodiversity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgrisC H, 1999, “Patenting plants: What to claim”Nature Biotechnology17717–718
2.
AndersenR, 2006, “Realising farmers' rights under the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, summary of findings from the Farmers' Rights Project (phase 1)”, Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Lysaker, Norway, http://www.fni.no/doc&pdf/FNI-R1106.pdf
3.
BaradK, 2003, “Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter”Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society28801–831
BowkerG CStarS L, 1999Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
6.
BrushS B, 1993, “Indigenous knowledge of biological resources and intellectual property rights: The role of anthropology”American Anthropologist, New Series95653–671
7.
BrushS B, 1999, “Bioprospecting the public domain”Cultural Anthropology14535–555
8.
BrushS B, 2000Genes in the Field: On-farm Conservation of Crop DiversityInternational Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, and Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL
9.
BrushS B, 2005, “Farmers' rights and the protection of traditional agricultural knowledge”, WP 36, Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, http://www.capri.cgiar.org/wp/capriwp36.asp
10.
CarlsonT J SMaffiL, 2004Ethnobotany and Conservation of Biocultural Diversity (The New York Botanical Garden Press, Bronx, NY)
11.
CarrizosaSBrushS BWrightB DMcGuireP E, 2004, “Accessing biodiversity and sharing the benefits: Lessons from implementing the convention on biological diversity”, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland, http://www.grcp.ucdavis.edu/publications/docABSPacRim/ABSPacRimwww.pdf
12.
CoombeR J, 2001, “The recognition of indigenous peoples' and community traditional knowledge in international law”St. Thomas Law Review14275–285
13.
CoombeR J, 2003, “Works in progress: Traditional knowledge, biological diversity and intellectual property in a neoliberal era”, in Globalization Under Construction: Governmentality Law and Identity Eds PerryR WMaurerB (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN) pp 273–314
14.
CoombeR JHermanA, 2004, “Rhetorical virtues: Property, speech, and the commons on the world-wide web”Anthropological Quarterly77559–574
15.
CorreaC M, 2000aIntellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries: The TRIPS Agreement and Policy Options (Zed Books, London)
CorreaC M, 2001, “Access to plant genetic resources and intellectual property rights”, in IP in Biodiversity and Agriculture Eds DrahosPBlakeneyM (Sweet and Maxwell, London) pp 101–132
18.
Council for TRIPS, 2002, “The relationship between the Trips Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity: Summary of issues raised and points made”, IP/C/W/368, World Trade Organization, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/ipcw368_e.pdf
19.
Council for TRIPS, 2006, “The relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and the Convention on Biological Diversity: Summary of issues raised and points made”, IP/C/W/368/Rev.1, World Trade Organization, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/ipcw368_e.pdf
20.
DeBeerJ, 2005, “Reconciling property rights in plants”The Journal of World Intellectual Property85–31
21.
DrahosP, 1996A Philosophy of Intellectual Property (Dartmouth, Aldershot, Hants)
22.
DrahosP, 1997, “Indigenous knowledge and the duties of intellectual property owners”Intellectual Property Journal11179–201
23.
DrahosP, 2004, “Intellectual property and pharmaceutical markets: A nodal approach to governance”Temple Law Review77401–424
24.
DrahosP, forthcoming, “A networked responsive regulatory approach to protecting traditional knowledge”, in Strategies to Optimize Economic Development in a TRIPS Plus Era Ed. GervaisD (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
25.
ElamM, 1999, “Living dangerously with Bruno Latour in a hybrid world”Theory, Culture and Society161–24
26.
FAO, 1993Harvesting Nature's Diversity (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome)
27.
FordR I, 1994, “Corn is our mother”, in Corn and Culture in the Prehistoric New World Eds JohannessenSHastorfC A (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) pp 513–526
28.
FowlerCSmaleMGaijiS, 2001, “Unequal exchange? Recent transfers of agricultural resources and their implications for developing countries”Development Policy Review19181–204
29.
GudemanS, 1996, “Sketches, qualms, and other thoughts on intellectual property rights”, in Valuing Local Knowledge: Indigenous People and Intellectual Property Rights Eds BrushS BStabinskyD (Island Press, Washington, DC) pp 102–121
HarawayD, 1999, “Between nature and culture: Cyborgs, simians, dogs, genes and us”, Humanities Lecture Series, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 13 May; may be consulted at the university library
32.
HarawayD, 2003, “Cloning mutts, saving tigers: Ethical emergents in technocultural dog worlds”, in Remaking Life and Death: Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences Eds FranklinSLockM (SAR Press, Santa Fe, NM) pp 293–328
33.
HaydenC, 2003When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
HaydenC, 2007, “Taking as giving: Bioscience, exchange, and the politics of benefit-sharing”Social Studies of Science37729–758
36.
HealdP J, 2003–2004, “The rhetoric of biopiracy”Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law11519–546
37.
IngoldT, 2000a, “On weaving a basket”, in The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill (Routledge, London) pp 339–348
38.
IngoldT, 2000b, “Making things, growing plants, raising animals and bringing up children”, in The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill (Routledge, London) pp 77–88
39.
IngoldT, 2000c, “Building, dwelling, living: How animals and people make themselves at home in the world”, in The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill (Routledge, London) pp 172–188
40.
JanisM DSmithS, 2006, “Obsolescence in intellectual property regimes”, Legal Studies Research paper number 05–48, University of Iowa, http://ssrn.com/abstract=897728
KloppenburgJ RJr, 1988Seeds and Sovereignty: The Use and Control of Plant Genetic Resources (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
43.
LatourB, 1987Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
44.
LatourB, 1993We Have Never Been Modern (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
45.
MaskusK E, 2004, “The globalization of private knowledge goods and the privatization of global public goods”Journal of International Economic Law7279–320
46.
MerrickL C, 1990, “Crop genetic diversity and its conservation in traditional agroecosystems”, in Agroecology and Small Farm Development Eds AltieriM AHechtS B (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) pp 3–11
47.
MusaT M, 1998, “Farmer seed systems”, Food and Agriculture Organization International Workshop on Developing Institutional Agreements and Capacity to Assist Farmers in Disaster Situations to Restore Agricultural Systems and Seed Security Activities, GCP/INT/660/NOR, http://www.fao.org/AG/agp/AGPS/Norway/Paper2.htm
48.
MusunguS FDutfieldG, 2003, “Multilateral agreements and a TRIPS-plus world: The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO)”, Quaker United Nations Office and Quaker International Affairs Programme, Ottawa, http://www.iprsonline.org/ictsd/docs/WIPO_Musungu_Dutfield.pdf
49.
NabhanG P, 1989Enduring Seeds: Native American Agriculture and Wild Plant Conservation (North Point Press, San Francisco, CA)
PalombiL, 2004The Patenting of Biological Materials in the Context of the Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights PhD dissertation, Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales, Sydney
52.
PilaJ, 2003, “Bound futures: Patent law and modern biotechnology”Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law9326–378
53.
PoseyD A, 2000, “Ethnobiology and ethnoecology in the context of national laws and international agreements affecting indigenous and local knowledge, traditional resources and intellectual property rights”, in Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and its Transformations: Critical Anthropological Perspectives, Eds EllenRParkesPBickerA (Hardwood Academic, Amsterdam) pp 35–54
54.
PottageA, 1998, “The inscription of life in law: Genes, patents, and bio-politics”Modern Law Review61740–765
55.
RabinowP, 1996Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
56.
RichardsP, 1996, “Culture and community values in the selection and maintenance of African rice”, in Valuing Local Knowledge: Indigenous People and Intellectual Property Rights Eds BrushS BStabinskyD (Island Press, Washington, DC) pp 209–229
57.
Roa-RodríguezCvan DoorenT, forthcoming, “The shifting common space of plant genetic resources in the international regulation of property”The Journal of World Intellectual Property
58.
RoseC M, 1994Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory, and Rhetoric of Ownership (Westview Press, Boulder, CO)
59.
SafrinS, 2004, “Hyperownership in a time of biotechnological promise: The international conflict to control the building blocks of life”The American Journal of International Law98641–685
SalazarRLouwaarsNVisserB, 2006, “On protecting farmers' new varieties: New approaches to rights on collective innovations in plant genetic resources”, WP 45, Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights, Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, http://www.capri.cgiar.org/pdf/CAPRIWP45.pdf
ShivaV, 1997Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge (South End Press, Boston, MA)
64.
SmilerB LErbischF H, 2004, “Introduction to intellectual property”, in Intellectual Property Rights in Agricultural Biotechnology Ed. ErbischF H (CABI Publishing, Cambridge, MA) pp 1–22
65.
StrathernM, 1999a, “The new modernities”, in Property Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things (Athlone Press, London) pp 117–135
66.
StrathernM, 1999b, “Potential property: Intellectual rights and property in persons”, in Property Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things (Athlone Press, London) pp 161–178
67.
StrathernM, 2001, “The patent and the Malanggan”Theory Culture and Society181–26
van DoorenT, 2007, “Terminated seed: Death, proprietary kinship and the production of (bio)wealth”Science as Culture1671–93
70.
van DoorenT, in preparation Biopatents: Agriculture in an Age of Enclosure
71.
VasseleuC, 1996, “Patent pending: Laws of invention, animal life forms and bodies as ideas”, in Thinking Through the Body of the Law Eds CheahPFraserDGrbichJ (New York University Press, New York) pp 105–119
