Although qualitative research in the area of gender-responsive offending pathways has grown extensively, little quantitative work has been conducted. This study utilizes interview and survey data to assess various gender-responsive needs with an intake cohort of 313 women probationers. Using a path analytic approach, the study statistically supported three gendered pathways to women offenders' incarceration: (a) a pathway beginning with childhood victimization that contributed to historical and current forms of mental illness and substance abuse; (b) a relational pathway in which women's dysfunctional intimate relationships facilitated adult victimization, reductions in self-efficacy, and current mental illness and substance abuse; and (c) a social and human capital pathway in which women's challenges in the areas of education, family support, and self-efficacy, as well as relationship dysfunction, contributed to employment/financial difficulties and subsequent imprisonment. Support for such gendered pathways has implications for both criminological explanations of female offending and correctional interventions for women.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author .
2.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (1995). Level of Service Inventory-Revised. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
3.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
4.
Arditti, J.A., & Few, A.L. (2006). Mothers' reentry to family life after incarceration . Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17, 103-123.
5.
Arnold, R. (1990). Processes of victimization and criminalization of Black women. Social Justice, 17, 153-166.
6.
Beattie, M. (1987). Codependent no more. New York : Harper/Hazelden.
7.
Belknap, J. (2007). The invisible woman: Gender, crime, and justice (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
8.
Belknap, J., Fisher, B., & Cullen, F.T. (1999). The development of a comprehensive measure of the sexual victimization of college women. Violence Against Women, 5, 185-214.
9.
Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency . Feminist Criminology, 1, 48-71.
10.
Benda, B.B. (2005). Gender differences in life-course theory of recidivism: A survival analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 325-342.
11.
Bepko, C., & Krestan, J. (1985). The responsibility trap: A blueprint for treating the alcoholic family. New York: Macmillan.
12.
Blanchette, K., & Brown, S.L. (2006). The assessment and treatment of women offenders: An integrative perspective. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
13.
Bloom, B. (1996). Triple jeopardy: Race, class, and gender as factors in women's imprisonment. Riverside, CAUniversity of California -Riverside.
14.
Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2003). Gender responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
15.
Bordieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
16.
Brennan, T. (2008). Explanatory diversity among female delinquents: Examining taxonomic heterogeneity. In R. T. Zaplin (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (2nd ed., pp. 197-232). Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
17.
Brennan, T., & Breitenbach, M. (2008, November). An internal classification of California prison female offenders: Evidence for multiple pathways. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, St. Louis, MO.
18.
Browne, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of research . Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66-77.
19.
Browne, A., Miller, B., & Maguin, E. (1999). Prevalence and severity of lifetime physical and sexual victimization among incarcerated women. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 301-322.
20.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1996a). Prison and jail inmates, 1995. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
21.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1996b). Probation and parole populations, 1995. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Justice.
22.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999). Special report: Women offenders. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Justice.
23.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2006). Special report: Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004 . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
24.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2008a). Prisoners in 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
25.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2008b). Probation and parole in the United States, 2007 statistical tables . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
26.
Campbell, D., Campbell, J., King, C., Parker, B., & Ryan, J. (1994). The reliability and factor structure of the Index of Spouse Abuse with African-American women. Violence and Victims, 9, 259-274.
27.
Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Chesney-Lind, M. (2000). What to do about girls? Thinking about programs for young women. In M. McMahon (Ed.), Assessment to assistance: Programs for women in community corrections (pp. 139-170). Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association .
29.
Chesney-Lind, M., & Rodriguez, N. (1983). Women under lock and key. The Prison Journal, 63, 47-65.
30.
Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R.G. (2004). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
31.
Coleman, F.L. (1997). Stalking behavior and the cycle of domestic violence . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 420-432.
32.
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital . American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S121.
33.
Covington, S. (1998). The relational theory of women's psychological development: Implications for the criminal justice system. In R. T. Zaplin (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp. 113-128). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
34.
Covington, S.S., & Bloom, B.E. (2006). Gender-responsive treatment and services in correctional settings. In E. Leeder (Ed.), Inside and out: Women, prison, and therapy (pp. 9-34). Binghamton, NY : Haworth.
35.
Covington, S.S., & Surrey, J. (1997). The relational model of women's psychological development: Implications for substance abuse. In S. Wilsnack & R. Wilsnack (Eds.), Gender and alcohol: Individual and social perspectives (pp. 335-351). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
36.
Crowley, J.D., & Dill, D. (1992). Silencing the Self scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 97-106.
37.
Daly, K. (1992). Women's pathways to felony court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies, 2, 11-52.
38.
Daly, K. (1994). Gender, crime, and punishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39.
Dowden, C., & Andrews, D.A. (1999). What works for female offenders: A meta-analytic review. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 438-452.
40.
Duncan, O.D. (1966). Path analysis: Sociological examples. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 1-16.
41.
Faller, K.C. (1990). Understanding child sexual maltreatment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Flavin, J. (2004). Employment counseling, housing assistance . . . and Aunt Yolanda? How strengthening families' social capital can reduce recidivism. Criminology & Public Policy, 3, 209-216.
45.
Fortuin, B. (2007). Maine's female offenders and reentering-and succeeding . Corrections Today, 69, 34-37.
46.
Funk, S.J. (1999). Risk assessment for juveniles on probation: A focus on gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 44-68.
47.
Gavazzi, S.M., Yarcheck, C.M., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2006). Global risk indicators and the role of gender in a juvenile detention sample. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 597-612.
48.
Gelinas, D.J. (1982). The persisting negative effects of incest. Psychiatry, 16, 312-332.
49.
Gendreau, P. (1996). The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117-130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
Gilfus, M.E. (1992). From victims to survivors to offenders: Women's routes of entry and immersion into street crime. Women & Criminal Justice, 4, 63-90.
51.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
Giordano, P.C., Cernkovich, S.A., & Rudolph, J.L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology , 107, 990-1064.
53.
Hardyman, P.L., & Van Voorhis, P. (2004). Developing gender-specific classification systems for women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
54.
Holsinger, K. (2000). Feminist perspectives on female offending: Examining real girls' lives. Women & Criminal Justice, 12, 23-51.
55.
Holsinger, K., Belknap, J., & Sutherland, J. (1999, November). Assessing the gender specific program and service needs for adolescent females in the juvenile justice system. Columbus, OH: Office of Criminal Justice Services.
56.
Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. (2003). The needs of women offenders: Implications for correctional programming. Women & Criminal Justice, 14, 137-160.
57.
Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M.D., & Morash, M. (2004). Poverty, state capital, and recidivism among women offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 3, 185-208.
58.
James, J., & Meyerding, J. (1977). Early sexual experiences and prostitution. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 1381-1385.
59.
Jeffries, S., Fletcher, G.J.O., & Newbold, G. (2003). Pathways to sex-based differentiation in criminal court sentencing. Criminology, 41, 329-353.
60.
Kaplan, A.G. (1984). The "self in relation": Implications for depression in women (Publication No. 14). Wellesley, MA: Stone Center.
61.
Lin, N. (2000). Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 785-796.
62.
Lowenkamp, C.T., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. (2001). Risk/need assessment, offender classification, and the role of child abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 28, 543-563.
63.
Lowenkamp, C.T., Latessa, E.J., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 575-594.
64.
Marquart, J.W., Brewer, V.E., Simon, P., & Morse, E.V. (2001). Lifestyle factors among female prisoners with histories of psychiatric treatment. Journal of Criminal Justice , 29, 319-328.
65.
McClellan, D.S., Farabee, D., & Crouch, B.M. (1997). Early victimization, drug use, and criminality: A comparison of male and female prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 455-476.
66.
McCorkel, J.A. (1996). Justice, gender, and incarceration: An analysis of the leniency and severity debate. In J. Inciardi (Ed.), Examining the justice process (pp. 157-176). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
67.
Miller, J.B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon.
68.
Miller, J.B. (1986). What do we mean by relationships? (Work in Progress No. 22). Wellesley, MA: Stone Center, Working Paper Series.
69.
Miller, J.B. (1988). Connections, disconnections, and violations (Work in Progress No. 33). Wellesley, MA: Stone Center, Working Paper Series.
70.
Miller, J.B., & Stiver, I.P. (1998). The healing connection: How women form relationships in therapy and life. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women.
71.
Morash, M., & Schram, P.J. (2002). The prison experience: Special issues of women in prison. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
72.
Murphy, C., & Hoover, S. (1999). Measuring emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct. Violence and Victims, 14, 39-53.
73.
Owen, B. (1998). In the mix: Struggle and survival in a woman's prison. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
74.
Owen, B., & Bloom, B. (1995). Profiling women prisoners: Findings from national surveys and a California sample. The Prison Journal, 75, 165-185.
75.
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, Pub. L. No. 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105 (1996).
76.
Peters, R.H., Strozier, A.L., Murrin, M.R., & Kearns, W.D. (1997). Treatment of substance abusing jail inmates: Examination of gender differences. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment , 14, 339-349.
77.
Pollack, S. (2000). Reconceptualizing women's agency and empowerment: Challenges to self-esteem discourse and women's lawbreaking. Women & Criminal Justice, 12, 75-89.
78.
Pollock, J. (1998). Counseling women in prison. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
79.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and application in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
80.
Reisig, M.D., Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. (2002). Social capital among women offenders: Examining distribution of social networks and resources. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18, 167-187.
81.
Reisig, M.D., Holtfreter, K., & Morash, M. (2006). Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly, 23, 384-405.
82.
Richie, B.E. (1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of Black battered women. New York: Routledge .
83.
Richie, B.E. (2001). Challenges incarcerated women face as they return to their communities: Findings from life history interviews. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 368-389.
84.
Rodenberg, F., & Fantuzzo, J. (1993). The measure of wife abuse: Steps toward the development of a comprehensive assessment technique. Journal of Family Violence, 8, 203-228.
85.
Roehling, P., & Gaumond, E. (1996). Reliability and validity of the Codependent Questionnaire . Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 14, 85-95.
86.
Rumgay, J. (2004). Scripts for safer survival: Pathways out of female crime. The Howard Journal, 43, 405-419.
87.
Salisbury, E.J., Van Voorhis, P., & Spiropoulos, G.V. (in press). The predictive validity of a gender-responsive needs assessment: An exploratory study. Crime & Delinquency. Available at http://cad.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/0011128707308102v1
88.
Shepard, M., & Campbell, J. (1992). The Abusive Behavior Inventory: A measure of psychological and physical abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 291-305.
89.
Sherer, M., Maddus, J., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. (1982). The Self-Efficacy scale: Construction and validation . Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.
90.
Siegel, J.A., & Williams, L.M. (2003). The relationship between child sexual abuse and female delinquency and crime: A prospective study. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 71-94.
91.
Smart, C. (1976). Women, crime, and criminology: A feminist critique . London: Routledge Kegan Paul .
92.
Sullivan, E., Mino, M., Nelson, K., & Pope, J. (2002). Families as a resource in recovery from drug abuse: An evaluation of La Bodega de la Familia. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
93.
Teague, R., Mazerolle, P., Legosz, M., & Sanderson, J. (2008). Linking childhood exposure to physical abuse and adult offending: Examining mediating factors and gendered relationships. Justice Quarterly, 25, 313-348.
94.
Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E.J., Wright, E., & Bauman, A. (2008). Achieving accurate pictures of risk and identifying gender responsive needs: Two new assessments for women offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
Woititz, J. (1983). Adult children of alcoholics. Hollywood, FL: Health Communications.
97.
Wright, E.M., Salisbury, E.J., & Van Voorhis, P. (2007). Predicting the prison misconducts of women offenders: The importance of gender-responsive needs . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 310-340.
