An emerging literature stream posits that drawing on users rather than internal designers in new product creation may benefit firms because the resulting products effectively satisfy consumer needs. Four studies conducted in the context of the luxury fashion industry uncover an important conceptual boundary condition of this positive user-design effect. Contrary to extant research, the results show that being “close” to users does not help but rather harms luxury fashion brands. Specifically, the authors find that user design backfires because consumer demand for a given luxury fashion brand collection is reduced if the collection is labeled as user (vs. company) designed. The results further reveal the underlying rationale for this reversal: user-designed luxury products are perceived to be lower in quality and fail to signal high status, which results in a loss of agentic feelings for the consumer. The authors explore several strategies luxury brands can pursue to overcome this negative user-design effect. Finally, they find that negative outcomes of user design are attenuated for luxury fashion products that are not used for status signaling—that is, product categories of a luxury brand that are characterized by lower status relevance for the consumer.
ArgoJennifer J., DarrenW. Dahl, and AndreaC. Morales (2006), “Consumer Contamination: How Consumers React to Products Touched by Others,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (April), 81–94.
2.
BelkRussell W., KennethD. Bahn, and RobertN. Mayer (1982), “Developmental Recognition of Consumption Symbolism,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (1), 4–17.
3.
BergerJonah, and WardMorgan (2010), “Subtle Signals of Inconspicuous Consumption,”Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (4), 555–69.
4.
BerthonPierre, LeylandF. Pitt, ParentMichael, and BerthonJean-Paul (2010), “Aesthetics and Ephemerality: Observing and Preserving the Luxury Brand,”California Management Review, 52 (1), 45–66.
5.
BruceMargaret, and KratzChristine (2007), “Competitive Marketing Strategies in Luxury Fashion Companies,” in Fashion Marketing: Contemporary Issues, 2d ed., HinesTony, and BruceMargaret, eds. New York: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, 130–50.
CappettaRossella, CilloPaola, and PontiAnna (2006), “Convergent Designs in Fine Fashion: An Evolutionary Model for Stylistic Innovation,”Research Policy, 35 (9), 1276–90.
DavisFred (1994), Fashion, Culture, and Identity.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
DouglasMary, and IsherwoodBaron (1979), The World of Goods.New York: Basic Books.
13.
DuboisBernard, LaurentGilles, and CzellarSandor (2001), “Consumer Rapport to Luxury: Analyzing Complex and Ambivalent Attitudes,” Working Paper No. 736, HEC Paris.
14.
EscalasJennifer E. (2004), “Narrative Processing: Building Consumer Connections to Brands,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (1/2), 168–79.
15.
FestingerLeon (1954), “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes,”Human Relations, 7 (2), 117–40.
16.
FinkelsteinJoanne (1996), Fashion: An Introduction.New York: New York University Press.
17.
FournierSusan (1998), “Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 343–74.
18.
FuchsChristoph, and DiamantopoulosAdamantios (2012), “Customer-Perceived Positioning Effectiveness: Conceptualization, Operationalization, and Implications for New Product Managers,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (2), 229–44.
19.
FuchsChristoph, PrandelliEmanuela, and SchreierMartin (2010), “Psychological Effects of Empowerment Strategies on Consumers' Product Demand,”Journal of Marketing, 74 (January), 65–79.
20.
FuchsChristoph, and SchreierMartin (2011), “Customer Empowerment in New Product Development,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (1), 17–32.
21.
GiordanoCaterina, JoanneV. Wood, and JohnL. Michela (2000), “Depressive Personality Styles, Dysphoria, and Social Comparisons in Everyday Life,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (3), 438–51.
22.
GoffmanErving (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.New York: Doubleday.
23.
HagtvedtHenrik, and VanessaM. Patrick (2008), “Art Infusion: The Influence of Visual Art on the Perception and Evaluation of Consumer Products,”Journal of Marketing Research, 45 (June), 379–89.
24.
HanYoung Jee, JosephC. Nunes, and DrèzeXavier (2010), “Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence,”Journal of Marketing, 74 (July), 15–30.
25.
HansenJochim, and WänkeMichaela (2011), “The Abstractness of Luxury,”Journal of Economic Psychology, 32 (5), 789–96.
HoyerWayne D., ChandyRajesh, DoroticMatilda, KrafftManfred, and SiddharthS. Singh (2010), “Consumer Co-Creation in New Product Development,”Journal of Service Research, 13 (3), 283–96.
KapfererJean-Nöel (2010), “Luxury After the Crisis: Pro Logo or No Logo?”The European Business Review, (September), (accessed May 22, 2013), [available at http://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/?p=2408].
30.
KapfererJean-Nöel, and BastienVincent (2009a), The Luxury Strategy: Break the Rules of Marketing to Build Luxury Brands.Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
31.
KapfererJean-Nöel, and BastienVincent (2009b), “The Specificity of Luxury Management: Turning Marketing Upside Down,”Journal of Brand Management, 16 (5/6), 311–22.
32.
KellerGottfried ([1874] 1929), Die Leute von Seldwyla [The People of Seldwyla and Seven Legends]. London: Ayer Company Publishers.
LeeMichael S.W., MotionJudith, and ConroyDenise (2009), “Anti-Consumption and Brand Avoidance,”Journal of Business Research, 62 (2), 169–80.
35.
LilienGary L., PamelaD. Morrison, SearlsKathleen, SonnackMary, and von HippelEric (2002), “Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development,”Management Science, 48 (8), 1042–60.
36.
LockeKenneth D. (2003), “Status and Solidarity in Social Comparison: Agentic and Communal Values and Vertical and Horizontal Directions,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (3), 619–31.
37.
LockeKenneth D., and JamieC. Nekich (2000), “Agency and Communion in Naturalistic Social Comparison,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26 (7), 864–74.
38.
ManlowVeronica (2009), Designing Clothes: Culture and Organization of the Fashion Industry.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
39.
MoreauC. Page, and KellyB. Herd (2010), “To Each His Own? How Comparisons with Others Influence Consumers' Evaluations of Their Self-Designed Products,”Journal of Consumer Research, 36 (5), 806–819.
40.
NishikawaHidehiko, SchreierMartin, and OgawaSusumu (2013), “User-Generated Versus Designer-Generated Products: A Performance Assessment at Muji,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30 (2), 160–67.
41.
OgawaSasumu, and FrankT. Piller (2006), “Reducing the Risks of New Product Development,”Sloan Management Review, 47 (2), 65–71.
OlsonBradley D., and DavidL. Evans (1999), “The Role of the Big Five Personality Dimensions in the Direction and Affective Consequences of Everyday Social Comparisons,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25 (12), 1498–1508.
45.
OrdabayevaNailya, and ChandonPierre (2011), “Getting Ahead of the Joneses: When Equality Increases Conspicuous Consumption Among Bottom-Tier Consumers,”Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (1), 27–41.
46.
PoetzMarion K., and SchreierMartin (2012), “The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas?”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (2), 245–56.
47.
PostrelVirginia (2003), The Substance of Style: How the Rise of Aesthetic Value Is Remaking Commerce, Culture, and Consciousness.New York: HarperCollins.
RichinsMarsha L. (1994), “Valuing Things: The Public and Private Meanings of Possessions,”Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (3), 504–521.
50.
RobinsonDwight E. (1961), “The Economics of Fashion Demand,”The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75 (3), 376–98.
51.
RossiterJohn R. (2002), “The C-OAR-SE Procedure for Scale Development in Marketing,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19 (4), 305–335.
52.
RuckerDerek D., and AdamD. Galinsky (2009), “Conspicuous Consumption Versus Utilitarian Ideals: How Different Levels of Power Shape Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (3), 549–55.
53.
SapirEdward (1931), “Fashion,” in Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, RobertEdwin, SeligmanAnderson, and JohnsonAlvin Saunders, eds. New York: Macmillan, 139–44.
54.
SchauHope Jensen, MuñizAlbert M.Jr., and EricJ. Arnould (2009), “How Brand Community Practices Create Value,”Journal of Marketing, 73 (September), 30–51.
55.
SchmittBernd H., and SimonsonAlex (1997), Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity, and Image.New York: The Free Press.
56.
SchreierMartin, FuchsChristoph, and DarrenW. Dahl (2012), “The Innovation Effect of User Design: Innovation Perceptions of Firms Selling Products Designed by Users,”Journal of Marketing, 76 (September), 18–32.
57.
SilversteinMichael J., and FiskeNeil (2003), “Luxury for the Masses,”Harvard Business Review, 81 (4), 48–57.
58.
SprolesGeorge B. (1981), “Analyzing Fashion Life Cycles: Principles and Perspectives,”Journal of Marketing, 45 (Autumn), 116–24.
59.
TormalaZakary L., JaysonS. Jia, and MichaelI. Norton (2012), “The Preference for Potential,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103 (4), 567–83.
60.
TungateMark (2008), Fashion Brands: Branding Style from Armani to Zara.London: Kogan Page.
61.
UlrichKarl T. (2007), Design: Creation of Artifacts in Society.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
62.
VeblenThorstein ([1899] 1994), The Theory of the Leisure Class.New York: Penguin Classics. First published by Macmillan.
63.
Von HippelEric (2005), Democratizing Innovation.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
WernerfeltBirger (1990), “Advertising Content When Brand Choice Is a Signal,”Journal of Business, 63 (1), 91–98.
65.
WheelerLadd, and MiyakeKunitate (1992), “Social Comparison in Everyday Life,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62 (5), 760–73.
66.
WoodJoanne V. (1996), “What Is Social Comparison and How Should We Study It?”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 (5), 520–37.
