Abstract
Background:
Tau proteins are established biomarkers of neuroaxonal damage in a wide range of neurodegenerative conditions. Although measurement of total-Tau in the cerebrospinal fluid is widely used in research and clinical settings, the relationship between age and total-Tau in the cerebrospinal fluid is yet to be fully understood. While past studies reported a correlation between age and total-Tau in the cerebrospinal fluid of healthy adults, in clinical practice the same cut-off value is used independently of patient’s age.
Objective:
To further explore the relationship between age and total-Tau and to disentangle neurodegenerative from drainage-dependent effects.
Methods:
We analyzed cerebrospinal fluid samples of 76 carefully selected cognitively healthy adults and included amyloid-β 1–40 as a potential marker of drainage from the brain’s interstitial system.
Results:
We found a significant correlation of total-Tau and age, which was no longer present when correcting total-Tau for amyloid-β 1–40 concentrations. These findings were replicated under varied inclusion criteria.
Conclusion:
Results call into question the association of age and total-Tau in the cerebrospinal fluid. Furthermore, they suggest diagnostic utility of amyloid-β 1–40 as a possible proxy for drainage-mechanisms into the cerebrospinal fluid when interpreting biomarker concentrations for neurodegenerative diseases.
INTRODUCTION
Tau proteins in the human central nervous system (CNS) occur in six isoforms produced from a single gene through alternative mRNA splicing. These proteins play a crucial role in maintaining the stability of microtubules in axons and are established biomarkers for several neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions [1]. While tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-Tau) is considered a specific biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), total-tau (t-Tau) is interpreted as a non-specific marker of neuronal and axonal damage [2]. t-Tau concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are elevated in numerous neurological and psychiatric conditions, ranging from acute brain injury like stroke [3] or traumatic brain injury [4] to neurodegenerative diseases like AD [5] and corticobasal degeneration [6]. Most markedly increased levels of t-Tau are observed in rapidly progressing conditions like Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease [7].
Accordingly, while elevated t-Tau concentrations in the CSF are thought to reflect neuroaxonal damage, it could be assumed that age-related neurotoxic actions like glial activation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress [8] lead to increased levels of t-Tau in the CSF. However, as data is scarce on this, in clinical practice the same cut-off value is used independently of age.
Few studies explicitly address the relationship between age and t-Tau in the CSF of healthy adults and those that do reported divergent results. Sjögren et al. [9] were the first to report a positive correlation in a sample of clinically healthy adults. Participants were required to score above 27 on Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [10]. Similarly, in later studies a positive association between t-Tau and age was found [11, 12]. In contrast, another study found no correlation [13]. Note that in two of the studies [12, 13], no cognitive screening was performed, and inclusion was solely based on patient history and clinical impression. The Mattsson et al. [11] sample was part of a larger study comparing patients with AD, patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and healthy controls; the latter were included if showing no signs of active neurological or psychiatric disease and a MMSE score above 25. Importantly, none of the above studies included additional data on CSF amyloid markers of AD to further rule out underlying AD pathology.
In conclusion, although most studies reported a positive correlation between age and t-Tau in the CSF of healthy adults, the quality of inclusion criteria is questionable and limits the generalizability of the findings.
Besides age-related changes in brain metabolism, other mechanisms could elevate t-Tau levels in the CSF of elderly subjects. Age-associated increased drainage from the cerebrum into the CSF might offer an alternate explanation, which would then result in altered levels of other peptides in the CSF as well. Drainage mechanisms of soluble peptides from the brain interstitial system into the CSF remain poorly understood [14], although recent studies suggest a central role of perivascular pathways called the glymphatic system [15]. The functionality of these mechanisms is suspected to be impaired in the aging brain [16, 17], thereby potentially leading to altered peptide levels in the CSF.
Even more than tau proteins, the role of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides has been studied extensively in the context of AD and neurodegeneration [18]. Aβ peptides derive from the membrane-bound amyloid-β protein precursor (AβPP) and, when deposited in extracellular plaques, constitute a pathological hallmark of AD [19]. Cleaving of AβPP results in various Aβ-species of different length. Those consisting of 40 amino acids (Aβ40) are the most abundant, followed by those consisting of 42 amino acids (Aβ42). While accumulation of Aβ42 is widely recognized as a key driver of AD pathophysiology [18], Aβ40 has been traditionally interpreted as non-pathogenic for AD [20]. Contrary to Aβ42, Aβ40 CSF concentrations only marginally differ between patients with AD dementia and controls [5]. Hence, the Aβ1–42/1 –40-ratio is widely used in clinical decision making and research to minimize pre-analytical Aβ42 biases and account for between-patient amyloid variations [21]. In view of the above, Aβ40 could be interpreted as a general marker of drainage from the brain’s interstitial system into the CSF, whereas this would not be the case for more specific biomarkers like Aβ42 and tau proteins.
In this study, we aimed to provide further insight into the relationship between age and t-Tau in the CSF by using Aβ40 as a proxy for drainage mechanisms of peptides into the CSF. Specifically, we explored relationships of age, t-Tau, and the ratio of t-Tau and Aβ40 to disentangle putative age-related from putative drainage-related effects. To ensure the exclusion of patients with neurological or psychiatric conditions, we employed rigorous inclusion criteria for study participation and thereby present data from a unique and carefully selected sample of cognitively healthy adults.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [22] and approved by the ethics committee of the Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany (project code: 29/17 S). All study participants provided written informed consent.
Sample characteristics and study procedures
Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are summarized in Table 1. Key points were the absence of any neurological or psychiatric disease (as indicated by clinical examination, medical history, reviewing patient files, and scoring on psychopathology questionnaires) and an MMSE score above 26, a validated cut-off to distinguish healthy subjects from patients with cognitive impairment and dementia [23]. To rule out prodromal or undetected AD, only patients with a normal Aβ42/40 ratio were included (> 0.05, established in-house using amyloid PET positivity as standard of truth in an independent cohort). Furthermore, a normal CSF cell count and lactate concentration were required to rule out inflammatory/infectious CNS processes.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria of study participation
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists [26]; BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory II [27]; MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [28].
Participants were recruited at the TUM School of Medicine hospital Klinikum Rechts der Isar in the years 2014 to 2019. CSF samples were obtained in the context of spinal anesthesia prior to orthopedic or urological surgery procedures.
As diagnostic validity of the MMSE in discriminating healthy participants from patients with subtle cognitive deficits has been criticized [24], a subset of participants underwent comprehensive neuropsychological testing covering the domains of memory, visuospatial, attentional, and executive functions for additional analyses. MMSE administration and neuropsychological testing was carried out during the week before surgery to avoid potentially confounding effects of post-operative pain medication [25].
CSF collection and analysis
For spinal anesthesia, lumbar puncture was performed between segments L3/4 or L4/5 and 5 to 10 ml of CSF were collected in polypropylene tubes prior to injection of the anesthetic. Samples were immediately stored on ice in upright position and processed within 1 h (i.e., centrifugated for 10 min and stored at –80°C for further analyses). Peptide (t-Tau, Aβ40, Aβ 42) concentrations were analyzed with established commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA; INNOTEST hTAU Ag, Fujirebio Europe N.V.; Amyloid-Beta [1–40] CSF ELISA, IBL International GmbH; Amyloid-Beta [1–42] CSF ELISA, IBL International GmbH) following standard clinical procedures in our round robin test-certified laboratory for neurochemical analyses. Additionally, CSF was analyzed regarding cell count, lactate and total protein count following clinical standard procedures no more than one hour after the lumbar puncture.
Statistical analysis
Data was analyzed using R: A language and environment for statistical computing [29]. Normality was checked for employing Shapiro Wilk tests. As most continuous variables were distributed non-normally, non-parametric methods were applied. As more male than female participants were included in the study, we checked for differences between sexes regarding peptide concentrations and demographics using Mann-Whitney U-Tests. For associations between age and CSF peptides, Spearman rank correlations and partial correlation analyses were conducted. Testing for differences between correlation coefficients was calculated according to the procedures suggested by Diedenhofen and Musch [30]. Bonferroni corrections of alpha levels were applied to adjust for multiple comparisons in subsamples.
RESULTS
Sample characteristics
CSF samples were obtained from n = 112 participants, of which n = 105 had an MMSE score above 26. After applying the delineated further criteria (see Table 1), n = 76 participants were included in the primary analysis. Exclusion was mainly due to non-normal Aβ42/40 ratios and MMSE scores. Patient characteristics and descriptive values of CSF peptide concentrations for the core sample (primary analyses) are shown in Table 2. As indicated by Mann-Whitney U-tests, neither t-Tau (p = 0.043) nor Aβ40 concentrations (p = 0.099) differed between male (n = 52) and female (n = 24) participants after applying a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (0.05/2 = 0.025).
Core sample (n = 76): patient characteristics and CSF peptide concentrations
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; M, mean; SD, standard deviation; MD, median; pctl, percentile.
For secondary analyses, we included subjects with normal Aβ42 concentrations (>650 pg/ml, cut-off established in-house using amyloid PET positivity as standard of truth in an independent cohort) instead of normal Aβ42/40 ratios (n = 82). Furthermore, analyses were repeated in a subset of participants who underwent extensive cognitive testing (n = 53) and scored within normal limits (cut-off –1.5 standard deviations below the mean of the age-, sex-, and education-adjusted normative values) and were thus determined to not suffer from MCI (n = 43) in addition to having normal Aβ42/40 ratios (n = 36).
Correlation analyses
Correlation analyses revealed a positive association of t-Tau and age (rho = 0.433, p < 0.001, significant after Bonferroni-correcting alpha-levels in the core sample; 0.05/4 = 0.0125) and age was similarly correlated with Aβ40 (rho = 0.581, p < 0.001). In contrast, the t-Tau/Aβ40 ratio was not correlated with age (rho = –0.026, p = 0.825), resulting in a significant difference between the correlation coefficients of t-Tau and age and the t-Tau/Aβ40 ratio and age (p < 0.001). Corresponding scatterplots are depicted in Fig. 1. Furthermore, when controlling for Aβ40 in a partial correlation analysis of t-Tau and age, no significant association was observed (rho = 0.190, p = 0.103).

Scatterplots and correlation coefficients for age and t-Tau as well as age and t-Tau/Aβ40 ratio in the core sample (n = 76, normal Aβ42/40 ratio).

Secondary analyses: Scatterplots and correlation coefficients for age and t-Tau as well as age and t-Tau/Aβ40 ratio (A: n = 82 for participants with normal Aβ42 concentrations, B: n = 36 for participants who underwent extensive neuropsychological evaluation with normal results and had normal Aβ42/40 ratios).
Secondary analyses revealed similar coefficients when using normal Aβ42 concentrations for inclusion regarding t-Tau and age (rho = 0.457, p < 0.001, significant after Bonferroni-correcting alpha-levels in this subsample; 0.05/3 = 0.0167) and the t-Tau/Aβ40 ratio and age (rho = –0.019, p = 0.886). A partial correlation analysis of t-Tau and age controlled for Aβ40 showed a non-significant association (rho = 0.218, p = 0.051) for this subset of patients. Comparable results were obtained when examining the subsample of neuropsychologically validated cognitive healthy subjects for t-Tau and age (rho = 0.405, p = 0.010, significant after Bonferroni-correcting alpha-levels in this subsample; 0.05/3 = 0.0167) and for the t-Tau/Aβ40 ratio and age (rho = 0.083, p = 0.631), as well as in a partial correlation analysis of t-Tau and age controlled for Aβ40 (rho = 0.151 p = 0.386). Testing for differences of correlation coefficients between primary and secondary analyses consistently revealed non-significant results for differences in correlations between t-Tau and age, as well as for differences in correlations between the t-Tau/ Aβ40 ratio and age.
Note that in all subsamples age was correlated with Aβ40 (rho = 0.439 in the core sample, rho = 0.403 for participants with normal Aβ42 concentrations and rho = 0.429 for participants who underwent comprehensive neuropsychological testing, all ps < 0.01).
DISCUSSION
In this study, we found a positive correlation between t-Tau and age in a sample of carefully selected healthy adults ranging from 30 to 85 years of age, which is in line with previous work. Crucially, this association was no longer present when correcting t-Tau for Aβ40 concentrations or controlling the correlation of t-Tau and age for Aβ40. These findings were replicated applying varied inclusion criteria regarding amyloid biomarkers for AD in order to exclude underlying asymptomatic AD and applying rigorous criteria for extensive cognitive testing in order to rule out subtle cognitive deficits.
Our results question the validity of the reported association of age and t-Tau in the CSF of normally aging subjects [9, 12] and raise issues regarding the role of Aβ40 in the context of interpreting CSF biomarkers associated with AD and other neurodegenerative diseases. While Aβ40 has traditionally been used to correct pre-analytical Aβ42 biases and to account for interindividual amyloid variations [21], it might have additional diagnostic value in clinical decision making and research settings. Since clinicians are constantly presented with ambiguous constellations of CSF biomarkers when testing patients suspected of suffering from neurodegenerative diseases, there is a clear need for better understanding factors influencing CSF peptide levels. While drainage-mechanisms from the brain’s interstitial system into the CSF remain a matter of ongoing debate [14], considering Aβ40 as a possible proxy for drainage-related interindividual variance in peptide concentrations could be of heuristic value. Note, however, that despite known diurnal fluctuations of amyloid peptide in CSF and plasma [31], our study does not provide direct in vivo evidence for Aβ40 as a marker of peptide drainage into the CSF.
In line with this, the diagnostic utility of the t-Tau/Aβ40 ratio should be explored in AD and other neurodegenerative diseases. For example, the diagnostic accuracy of CSF-t-Tau in distinguishing patients with AD at an asymptomatic or MCI stage from healthy aging might be underestimated when not taking drainage-related interindividual differences into account.
In contrast to previous studies examining t-Tau in the CSF of healthy subjects, we excluded subjects with abnormal amyloid profiles of CSF biomarkers for AD (as the most common underlying cause of dementia; [32]). Furthermore, we ruled out other infectious/inflammatory CNS processes by analyzing samples regarding cell count and lactate levels. In order to minimize influences of undetected psychopathology on the results of cognitive testing [33], we also included measures of affective symptoms and excluded depression. We strongly recommend following strict inclusion and exclusion criteria when examining biomarkers of neurodegeneration in healthy subjects to maximize validity of results.
Our study has some limitations, which should be addressed in further research. As our sample size is moderate and patients were recruited at a single hospital, results should be replicated with a larger number of patients in a multi-center approach. Additionally, the drainage mechanisms of other, non-amyloid proteins should be evaluated in further studies as Aβ40 cannot be viewed as completely neutral to AD pathology. For instance, Aβ40 has been studied as a CSF marker for cerebral amyloid angiopathy [34]. As analysis of AD-related peptides from more easily accessible body fluids than CSF is gaining attention [35], the relationship between age and individual biomarkers of neurodegeneration in blood and saliva should be examined in future studies.
In this study, we found a correlation of CSF t-Tau and age in cognitively healthy adults, which was no longer present when correcting t-Tau for Aβ40 concentrations. The results call into question the reported association of age and t-Tau. Furthermore, they suggest diagnostic utility of Aβ40 as a proxy for CSF drainage mechanisms when interpreting biomarker concentrations of neurodegeneration in research and clinical settings.
Footnotes
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors like to cordially thank Tamara Eisele for measuring the peptides in the CSF, and all patients for their donating CSF to this study. We would also like to give special thanks to Stephen Starck from the Language Center of the Technical University of Munich for his help proof reading and editing the manuscript.
