This paper contributes to the ongoing discussion of the historical geography of modernity. It is argued that the exclusive focus on social theory has detrimental effects on the appreciation of normative political concerns and that it ignores the resurgence of normative political theory. Habermas's concept of the public sphere, and its place within his theoretical and empirical studies, is, by contrast, commendably concerned with linking the social and historical work with normative political theorising, and its usefulness for geographical investigation is applauded. However, the criticisms directed from, in particular, communitarian political theorists and contextualist social researchers would seem to make his attempt to bring a ‘strong’ theory of public political life back within the remit of a reconstructed social theory less plausible. One set of responses to this criticism comes in the form of the attempt to build geography into this normative political theory, turning public spheres into public spaces; Arcndt's political theory, in conclusion, is thus held to be a significant contribution to the historical geography of modernity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArendtH, 159The Human Condition (Doubleday, New York)
2.
ArendtH, 1965aEichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
3.
ArendtH, 1965bOn Revolution (Viking Press, New York)
4.
ArendtH, 1968b, “The conquest of space and the stature of man”, in Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought Ed. ArendtH (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx) pp 265–280
5.
ArendtH, 1969On Violence (Harcourt, Brace and World, New York)
6.
ArendtH, 1970Men in Dark Times (Jonathan Cape, London)
7.
ArendtH, 1973aThe Origins of Totalitarianism (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York)
8.
ArendtH, 1973bCrises of the Republic (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
9.
BarberB, 1988The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
10.
BarnouxD, 1990Visible Spaces: Hannah Arendt and the German-Jewish Experience (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD)
11.
BenhabibS, 1986Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory (Columbia University Press, New York)
12.
BenhabibS, 1992aSituating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics (Polity Press, Cambridge)
13.
BenhabibS, 1992b, “Autonomy, modernity and community: Communitarianism and critical social theory in dialogue”, in Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics Ed. BenhabibS (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 68–88
14.
BenhabibS, 1992c, “Models of public space: Hannah Arendt, the liberal tradition and Jiirgen Habermas”, in Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics Ed. BenhabibS (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 89–120
15.
BreenT H, 1980, “Persistent localism: English social change and the shaping of New England institutions”, in Puritans and Adventurers: Change and Persistence in Early America (Oxford University Press, New York) pp 3–24
16.
CalhounC, 1992, “Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere”, in Habermas and the Public Sphere Ed. CalhounC (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 1–48
17.
CanovanM, 1974The Political Thought of Hannah Arendt (Methuen, Andover, Hants)
18.
CarlingA, 1986, “Rational choice Marxism”New Left Review number 160, 24–62
19.
CastoriadisC, 1991Philosophy, Politics, Autonomy: Essays in Political Philosophy (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
20.
DallmayrF R, 1984Polis and Praxis: Exercises in Contemporary Political Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
21.
DeleuzeG, 1979, “Foreword: The rise of the social”, in The Policing of Families Ed. DonzelotJ (Pantheon Books, New York) pp ix–xvii
22.
d'EntrèvesM P, 1992, “Hannah Arendt and the idea of citizenship”, in Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community Ed. MouffeC (Verso, London) pp 145–168
23.
DriverF, 1985, “Power, space, and the body: A Critical assessment of Foucault's Discipline and Punish”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space3425–446
24.
DriverF, 1988, “The historicity of human geography”Progress in Human Geography12497–506
25.
EleyG, 1990, “Edward Thompson, social history and political culture: The making of a working-class public, 1780–1850”, in E. P. Thompson: Critical Perspectives Eds KayeH JMcLellandK (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 12–49
26.
EleyG, 1992, “Nations, public, and political cultures: Placing Habermas in the nineteenth century”, in Habermas and the Public Sphere Ed. CalhounC (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 289–339
27.
EleyGNieldK, 1980, “Why does social history ignore politics?”Social History5249–283
28.
ForesterJ (Ed.)., 1985Critical Theory and Public Life (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
29.
FramptonK, 1979, “The status of man and the status of his objects: A Reading of The Human Condition”, in Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World Ed. HillM A (St Martin's Press, New York) pp 101–130
30.
FraserN, 1989a, “Women, welfare and the politics of need interpretation”, in Politics and Social Theory Ed. LassmanP (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants) pp 104–122
31.
FraserN, 1989b, “The French Derrideans: Politicizing deconstruction or deconstructing the political?”, in Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 69–92
32.
FraserN, 1989c, “What's critical about critical theory? The case of Habermas and gender”, in Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 113–143
33.
GeertzC, 1973The Interpretation of Cultures (Basic Books, New York)
34.
GeertzC, 1983Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (Basic Books, New York)
35.
GoodmanD, 1992, “Public sphere and private life: Toward a synthesis of current historiographical approaches to the old regime”History and Theory311–20
36.
GregoryD, 1989, “The crisis of modernity? Human geography and critical social theory”, in New Models in Geography Eds PeetRThriftN (Unwin Hyman, London) pp 348–390
37.
GregoryD, 1990, “‘Grand maps of history’: Structuration theory and social change”, in Anthony Giddens; Consensus and Controversy Eds ClarkJModgilCModgilS (Falmer Press, Basingstoke, Hants) pp 217–234
38.
GregoryD, 1991, “Interventions in the historical geography of modernity: Social theory, spatiality and the politics of representation”Geografiska Annaler B7317–44
39.
GregoryDUrryJ (Eds), 1985Social Relations and Spatial Structures (Macmillan, London)
40.
HaanNBellahR NRabinowPSullivanW U (Eds), 1983Social Science as Moral Inquiry (Columbia University Press, New York)
41.
HabermasJ, 1977, “Hannah Arendfs communications concept of power”Social Research443–24
42.
HabermasJ, 1980, “On the German-Jewish heritage”Telos44127–131
43.
HabermasJ, 1985, “Modern and postmodern architecture”, in Critical Theory and Public Life Ed. ForesterJ (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) pp 317–329
44.
HabermasJ, 1989The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Polity Press, Cambridge)
45.
HannerzU, 1990, “Cosmopolitans and locals in world culture”, in Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity Ed. FeatherstoncM (Sage, London) pp 237–251
46.
HarveyD, 1973Social Justice and the City (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
47.
HellerAFehérF, 1988The Postmodern Political Condition (Polity Press, Cambridge)
48.
HolubR C, 1991Jürgen Habermas; Critic in the Public Sphere (Routledgc, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants)
49.
JacobsonN, 1983. “Parable and paradox: In response to Arendt's On Revolution”Salmagundi60123–139
50.
JardineA, 1985Gynesis: Configurations of Women and Modernity (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)
KeaneJ, 1984Public Life and Late Capitalism: Toward a Socialist Theory of Democracy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
53.
KeatR, 1981The Politics of Social Theory: Habermas, Freud, and the Critique of Positivism (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
54.
KristevaJ, 1991Strangers to Ourselves (Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, Herts)
55.
KymlickaW, 1989Liberalism, Community and Culture (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
56.
LashSUrryJ, 1986, “The dissolution of the social”, in Sociological Theory in Transition Eds WardellM LTurnerS P (Allen and Unwin, London) pp 95–109
57.
LassmanP, 1986, “Sociological theory and politics”, in Sociological Theory in Transition Eds WardcllM LTurnerS P (Allen and Unwin, London) pp 59–68
58.
LassmanP, 1989, “Introduction: Politics and social theory”, in Politics and Social Theory Ed, LassmanP (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants) pp 1–11
59.
LukeT W, 1990Social Theory and Modernity: Critique, Dissent, and Revolution (Sage, London)
60.
LukesS, 1975Émile Durkheim, His Life and Work: A Historical and Critical Study (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
61.
LukesS, 1985Marxism and Morality (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
62.
LuxemburgR, 1951The Accumulation of Capital (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants)
63.
MayfieldDThorneS, 1992, “Social history and its discontents: Gareth Stedman Jones and the politics of language”Social History17165–188
64.
MumfordL, 1966The City in History (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx)
65.
NisbetR, 1977, “Hannah Arendt and the American Revolution”Social Research4463–79
66.
PAC (Ed.), 1992, Public number 6, Public Access Collective, Toronto
67.
ParekhB, 1981Hannah Arendt and the Search for a New Political Philosophy (Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey, NJ)
PhiloC, 1992, “Foucault's geography”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space10137–161
70.
PiersonC, 1989, “Marxism, democracy and the public sphere”, in Politics and Social Theory Ed. LassmanP (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants) pp 30–47
71.
PlantR, 1991aModern Political Thought (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
72.
PlantR, 1991b, “Political philosophy on Dover Beach? Reasoning, context and community”, in Modern Political Thought (Basil Blackwell, Oxford) pp 320–379
73.
PooleR, 1991Morality and Modernity (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants)
74.
RawlsJ, 1971A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
75.
RicoeurP, 1983, “Action, story and history: On re-reading The Human Condition”Salmagundi6060–72
76.
RogersA, 1992, “The boundaries of reason: The world, the homeland, and Edward Said”Environment and PlanningD: Society and Space10511–526
77.
RortyR, 1989Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
78.
SabiaD RWallulisJ (Eds), 1983Changing Social Science: Critical Theory and Other Critical Perspectives (State University of New York, Albany, NY)
79.
SalkeverS G, 1983, “Beyond interpretation: Human agency and the slovenly wilderness”, in Social Science as Moral Inquiry Eds HaanNBellahR NRabinowPSullivanW M (Columbia University Press, New York) pp 195–215
80.
SartoriG, 1973, “What is politics?”Political Theory15–26
81.
ScaffL, 1989Fleeing the Iron Cage: Culture, Politics, and Modernity in the Thought of Max Weber (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
82.
SennettR, 1986The Fall of Public Man (Faber and Faber, London)
83.
SojaE, 1989Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (Verso, London)
84.
TassinE, 1992, “Europe: A Political community?”, in Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community Ed. MouffeC (Verso, London)
85.
TaylorC, 1985a, “Social theory as practice”, in Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 91–115
86.
TaylorC, 1985b, “Atomism”, in Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 187–210
87.
UngerR M, 1975Knowedge and Politics (The Free Press, New York)
88.
UngerR M, 1976Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory (The Free Press, New York)
89.
UngerR M, 1987False Necessity: Anti-necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
90.
WardellM LTurnerS P (Eds), 1986aSociological Theory in Transition (Allen and Unwin, London)
91.
WardellM LTurnerS P, 1986b, “Introduction: Dissolution of the classical project”, in Sociological Theory in Transition Eds WardellM LTurnerS P (Allen and Unwin, London) pp 11–18
92.
WerckmeisterO K, 1989Citadel Culture (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
93.
WhiteS K, 1988The Recent Work of Jiirgen Habermas: Reason, Justice and Modernity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
94.
WhitfieldS, 1980Into the Dark: Hannah Arendt and Totalitarianism (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA)
95.
WinchP, 1958The Idea of a Social Science (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hantgs)
96.
WinchP, 1972, “Understanding a primitive society”, in Ethics and Action (Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Andover, Hants) pp 8–49
97.
WinfieldR D, 1991, “Political freedom and territorial rights”, in Freedom and Modernity (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY) pp 283–304
98.
WolinS, 1981, “Max Weber: Legitimation, method and theory”Political Theory9401–424
99.
YoungI M, 1987, “Impartiality and the civic public: Some implications of feminist critiques of moral and political theory”, in Feminism as Critique: Essays on the Politics of Gender in Late-capitalist Societies Eds BenhabibSCornellD (Polity Press, Cambridge) pp 57–76
100.
YoungI M, 1990Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
